Library of Responses

Review and learn from interview and Casper test responses.

100+ Interview Responses
700+ Casper Responses

We reimagined a fantastic resource and added a few more of our own.

We've helped hundreds of learners get into their healthcare profession with these curated interview practice resources. Practice and improve with us for the best results.

Become confident with our metrics-based assurance

We've reviewed thousands of responses to reliably calibrate your response. Feel confident; you've earned it.

We're with you every step of the way.

Our guided learning paths are honed by years of mentorship and successful applicants, backed by thousands of reviews. So go ahead, start your journey with confidence!

Videoath Verified.

We routinely check on our resources to ensure they're up to date and continue to be a good reference.

Trusted by 3871 others.

You're in good company. We update this counter to let you know who else completed the prompt.

Curate a realistic interview.

Bookmark a question so you can get back to it later. Become a member and build your own list now!

Didn't know what to say?

Read de-identified and anonymized peer responses.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Tag

Showing 0 of 100

Casper

I would first show her my full support and listen to her concerns, while remaining sensitive and considerate of what she may be feeling. I would then advise her to consider speaking to the manager in private and informing him of her concerns. In addition I would consider confronting the manager to speak to him in private as well and hear the story from his perspective. If it turns out that the accusations are true I would help her in getting the support shee needs whether it be contacting HR or other bodies to help her out.

student-520

Casper

As the bus driver, John has a professional responsibility to follow the rules. So, I am concerned about the elderly lady's health, upholding justice (everybody else paid, so it would be unfair to let her on without paying), and also john's reputation and job (because he could face consequences for letting her on). So, I would first try to find an alternative solution. Could john wait while the lady walks back to her house? Would another passenger be willing to pay the $2 (or whatever the bus fair is in funtown), i have done that a couple of times, but its unfair to expect others to. Also, if john has the means and is seriously concerned about the lady, could he possibly pay for her?

student-210

Casper

I believe someone would make this statement based on understand that volunteering is looked upon as a beneficial thing to raise someones values for their betterment. It will help them when they are applying to jobs and professional schools. Showing others and the administration that they are people who has a value to be of service to others.

student-580

Casper

I don't want to jump to anyconclusions. THere may be many explnaantions for my supervisors apparent intoxication, including alcohol consumption, fatigue, or even the start of a new medication for example. However, if their judgement is indeed impaired this represents a huge problem for person in the clinic which represent a vulnerable population. So I do want to take action. I'd begin by having a private non-judgemental conversation with my supervisor when time permitted and simply state my observations and concerns for patient safety.

student-388

Casper

There was a time when I was working as a Personal Trainer and I came across a client that was very discouraged about her goals and did not know how she would be able to achieve them. More specifically she felt embarrased about working out in front of others in the gym

student-402

Casper

I would start by empathizing with my friend and asking him if he plagiarized his work. If he said yes, I would tell him that I will help him the best that I can to finish it with his own work. If I would come from a place of understanding and validate the stress he has been under and would offer to go through the course content with him on a day that we don't have an assignment due.

student-506

Casper

I would not forbid my child from being friends with another due to our financial status, instead I would offer support and explanations to my child as to why our situation is the way that it is, and how his friend may be fortunate to have those toys, but it doesn't mean that we love our child any less. It would be unfair to him to lose a friend becasue of our finances.

student-510

Casper

This is a difficult situaiton as missing the final exam may lead to failing the class and negatively impact academics and possible future careers as there would be no guarantee that this would qualify for an academic concession and I would be able to retake the exam. I would see if i can wait for any cars to leave as parking on the side streets is not allowed and would result in getting a ticket and possibly getting towed.

student-586

Casper

In my biochemistry class, my group project included 7 students. We all came in with our own experiences. Most of us didn't know much about biochemistry at first, so we deferred to someone who's more knowledgeable. He acted as a peer tutor for us, and I learned a lot about biochemistry both from readings and classes, and from him. From this experience, I learned the importance of humility and learning from people with more knowledge and experience.

student-216

Casper

Firstly, I would approach Sammy in a non-judgemental or confrontational manner and understand the details of the situation without making assumptions. I would then express to Sammy how this is not acting with integrity and is against the law. I would encourage Sammy to do the correct thing and come forward to confess for the crime. If this fails to happen, I would need to act within my own morals and tell law enforcement myself about Sammy.

student-383

Casper

I beleive that corporate tax being lower is fine however the way that individuals are using it to escape personal tax is a flawed system and there should specific laws that target the misuse of funding yourself through a corporation.

student-535

Casper

This is a complex topic and has many layers. Firstly, there many appear to be inherent inequity in this corporate tax law since indiivudlas of higher status and power are often the ones who are in ownership of these businesses. This can be difficult for those individuals who are taxed more because they do not have the money or power to make their own businesses successful. However, the corproate tax also works to help these businesses expand and thus give enrichment to the communinty as a whole. Thus, I believe that although the corporate tax may appear to have inheerent disadvatnages, in the long-term it works for the benefit of the society as a whole.

student-258

Casper

My mother and my sister have a very tough relationship. They are often fighting, which compounds due to my mother's physical and mental health issues. I promised my sister that we would call every weekend over zoom to work together (ever since I moved to university) so that she wouldn't feel alone in the house. However, during exam season, I found myself cancelling as I felt like I needed private time to study hard. Looking back, although my sister very kindly understood my position,m I feel very remorseful for having taken that time from her, as I now realize how important it was to her. I have committed since then to always showing up, even if it's with my camera off and just typing in chat, because I know how much she needs me.

student-144

Casper

I would give them the mandatory minimum fine as I think it is important to apply the law justly while also keeping their consequences to a minimum. If there was no malice in their actions, they do nit deserve a severe punishment. I would also make sure they are in the wrong and talk to them before fining them to see if there is a misunderstanding or a better solution available.

student-640

Casper

I don't agree with this statement because what this statment implies is that in order to solve a problem we must engage in problematic behavior. Although the poor must be addressed and helped, if we people end up stealing in order to give resources to the poor than we end up with another problem being that other people who also need those resouces won;t have access to them. In order to help the poor we must exerise moral conduct and ethically source the needs that the poor should be provided with.

student-312

Casper

Socrates meant that in life there are so many experiences that we can learn from. An inquisitive thirsty mind is more receptive towards learning and getting themselve more arare rather than an arrogant mind. we should be like sponge soaking all the knowledge from the world from anyone , anytime and anywhere and should not confide ourselves just to textbooks.

student-628

Casper

I would first comfort my friend and ensure that they are feeling alright as they were clearly bothered by the situation. Once I know my friend is doing better or if I'm with other friends, once I know they are being taken care of by another friend, I would approach the person who took the video. It is important to be non-confrontational and to simply explain to the videotaper that my friend and I do not like being videotaped and we request that they delete the video. I would suggest maybe taking the video from another angle or if they wanted that specific moment on tape and I have the footage I would offer to share it with them as I can guarantee that my friend and I are not in it. If the person is refusing to delete the video, then I would calmly ask someone such as security for help as it is important to my friend that they not be on video.

student-452

Casper

My friend of 5 years impressed upon me a situation where they were cheating during a University exam. They promised me not to discuss this in fear of failing out of the course and potentially out of University. I strongly advised this individual that cheating violates academic integrity and for them to own up to their cheating. I told them that I would be there for them despite these consequences, and elected to discuss it with my professor, violating my promise. I empathized with their situation and told them that though I violated this promise and potentially ruined their career, I believed that academic honesty trumps even our friendship.

student-178

Casper

In this sitautio I would tell the customer the polciy of the business that I could not give back without a receipt and suggest they looked in different places for it. I could not break company polciy since that would jeopardize my own job and make me a non-trustworyh employee.

student-162

Casper

I work as waitress as a restaurant during the summer and having bee there for several years, I am activiely involved in training new-hires. This involves shadowing, support as well as feedback for new-hires. One summer, I had to provide feedback to a waitress regarding the way they interacted with some of our older customers. Unfortuntealy, she was often impateint and unaccommodating to customers with mobility issues. I approached her after close, in a private setting and asked for time to chat. Then, I made sure she knew i was going to provide some pointers based on what I had noticed this past shift. I made sure to sandwhich the improvement feedabck with positive: \"You did a great job keeping up with the pace of our fast dinner shift today. However, it might be worht considering being more apteint and understanding of our elderly customers. That said, I really appreciated when you ehelped clear my tables and I hope you will come to me for help int eh future as well.:\"

student-166

Casper

In this situation, i am mainly concerned for my friends. I would kindly ask all of them if they wanted me to ask the people to stop recording. If they did, i would quietly and non-confrontationally approach them and request that they stop recording and delete the video as we are uncomfortable. i believe that this is a reasonable request as there are many harms that could come to someone by having their image unwillingly uploaded to social media or used in other ways without their consent

student-227

Casper

I think this quote has quite a few flaws as their is so much more to a job then looking like you know what you were doing. This can become an ethical issue as many jobs hold important standards and ethically and legally you should be able to fully understand your job.

student-542

Casper

From the prompt it seems as though I had may not begun the exam, nor had I used any of the notes on the exam. I would inform the professor on the exact situation and let them know I had no intention of cheating. I would ask them if they could allow me to take the exam on another day and apologize for my grave mistake of leaving the notes in pencil case. Furthermore, If I received no advantage (had the exam not begun) I would ask them if they could let me still complete the exam today.

student-500

Casper

Although Jessica is struggling, Richard should not tell her or other students about the database, as it would be considered academic dishonesty and is not genuine to their intellectual aptitude. However, Richard should reach out to Jessica in a private and nonjudgemental way to see if she could use extra support or invite her to study sessions or help by providing study guides that may be helpful .

student-448

Casper

I think that parking prices should be lowered, because in emergency situations it is important that the family/friends/caregivers of the sick patient is able to visit them to feel more assured, as I am sure they are extremely stressed and worried sick. Furthermore, it will also offer emotinal support for the patient which is critical to helping them feel better and be in a better mindset to recover. Sometimes, emergencies will go wrong and the patient may not survive. If the family could not visit the patient in hospital before the patient passes away due to high parking costs, that is extremely distressing and disheartening.

student-160

Casper

This situation is difficult since the law is involved. However, out of compassion and human kindness I beleive John should let the old lady get a ride for free. As much as the law is involved and it is very important to obey this is make sure every customer pays before getting on, it is also very importnat to be a kind and empathetic human being when necessary. It is not every day that someone comes up to you asking for a free triket, so i feel like it is necessary to let the lady on and john could out of kindness pay for her ticket himself.

student-370

Casper

I was working at the vaccination center and someone was feeling ill. As a medical professionnal, my job is to take care of our patients. I called for help and made sure to stabilize the patient. I told the family baout the situation and told them the next steps. When the patient was feeling better I made sure to give him advise for next time such as eating a full meal and hydrating yourself before getting the next shot.

student-657

Casper

James may have observed that the players that perform worse have been affecting their game scores. Perhaps the team has been losing for a while and the coach is getting frustrated with the results. It could be that the next games are higher stakes and that James is very focused on winning.

student-176

Casper

he should first invite the employee to a private room and tell the worker calmly about the situation without any personal emotions, then he should also listen to the employee's point of view and his reason for stealing bread because even though kevin knows the general reason behind the stealing there might be more story in the stealing that he should know

student-494

Casper

Firstly, I am concerned for the mental health of the recipient of the joke. My first thought is to discuss the possible mental health outcomes to the jokester and emphasize that this is a professional environment where offensive jokes should not take place. I recognize that my coworker may not be aware of the offensive nature of the joke and I would have a private conversation with him or her where I talk about how this could impact our coworker and the underlying biases that could be at play. I would be careful to be nonjudgmental and not assume bad intent during this conversation as to not damage my report with my coworker.

student-362

Casper

There are numerous factors that may have prompted James to ask this of Kevin. James may want to ensure the team's success either for the good of himself, his players, or the organization. He may want to avoid conflict with the player and ask Kevin to handle it instead. He also may be looking to give Kevin a larger role as a coach and want to give him the harder tasks to perform.

student-41

Casper

I like to think that he meant that curiosity is an innate quality. It is not like many other human emotions like pride or envy which derive from relations with people, but instead that curiosity is this fundamental human element which is simply part of us and drives us forward for no reason other than our curiosity about the world around us.

student-235

Casper

Sarah should talk with George as she was the one to initally hire him and they have a working history. Sarah should have an open conversation with George that is clear and concise. She should voice where she is coming from and also try and understand George's situation. There might be information that she is unaware of pertaining to his personal life that my provide reasons for his behaviour.

student-278

Casper

There could be many reasons behind the prevailing skepticism. For one, it could be a lack of knowledge or belief in the science behind mindfulness and its effectiveness. It could also be perhaps its simplicity; when connected with the giant of stress one might think \"how can something so simple as mindfulness help me get through this?\"

student-594

Casper

I believe that the hospital should not treat the father in a different manner. Although, I acknowledge that what did donor did in donating a huge sum of amount to this local hospital is rather compassionate of them. But the hospital would have the duty to treat every patient in the same manner despite any past actions that a family member must have done no matter it being positive or negative.

student-271

Casper

If I confirm that they were absuing the cat I would approach them and take the cat away. I would ensure that they recgonzie how ehtically corrupt their behavirou was but say it in a calm tone to improve the chance that they listen. I would give them a chance to improve their mroal cahracter by not informign authroities or their parents so that they are not immediately labeled as abusers.

student-224

Casper

I would not purchase the test as it is unethical to do so. It will not benefit me in the long-run to purchase these questions and do well in the course, as I would not be learning to my full potential. This is also unfair to my peers who have put in the effort and hard work, as now it is lowering the standards for success. To be fair all around, I would not purchase these tests.

student-332

Casper

I am in a difficult situation because I do not want to miss my exam, but at the same time, I do not want to get a ticket or get towed. Often times with exams, if you do not show up within the first 15 minutes, you are not allowed to take the exam at all. Given this, I would choose to park on one of the side streets so that I can make it in time for the exam. I have not received a ticket before so I am at less risk of getting into further trouble for that, and this would give me the opportunity to give it my all on the exam.

student-59

Casper

Teamwork can fail due to a multitude of reasons including miscommunication between team members, unequal distribution of work, and lack of team meetings. Communication within a team is very important for its success because, without it, other members of the team would feel out of the loop and will be unable to coordinate effectively to achieve a common goal. Moreover, if the work is not equally distributed then it can be difficult for p

student-246

Casper

Volunteering allows individuals to be exposed to people of different backgrounds. This could be individuals with different socioeconomic status, cultures, religions, beliefs or health.

student-294

Casper

Teamwork sometimes does not work properly for many reasons such as lack of communication among the team members, uneven dividing of work, different levels of interest, insufficient time for completion and unforeseen circumstances . When the team doesn't properly discuss the different aspects and responsibilities of each member, it may be difficult and confusing. Furthermore, teams need to communicate about the work being done and ensure the others are on board and not stuck on a certain aspect.

student-468

Casper

This is a difficult situation for John as he may feel a conflict between his responsibility to his job and what he may feel morally to do. On one hand, it is understandable that one may want to \"make an exception\" to the rules for the case of this kind elderly lady who is rushing to an urgent appointment, as there is empathy for her situation. On the other hand, in his role, John has a responsibility to uphold the regulations of this employer requiring all to pay a bus fair. In this situation, it is important that John upholds the responsibilities and rules of his job - but to enforce them in a way that listens to the lady's concerns. He should tell her that he understands he predicament, and that he is sorry for the difficult position this puts her, but that he must follow the regulations of his employer, for fairness to them and also to the other passengers on the bus. He may also then suggest alternative methods of obtaining a ticket, for instance if there is anyone close by or anyone she could call for a ticket, or if there is any other way to get her to her destination.

student-1

Casper

The philospher probably means in this situaiton that there is a bountiful amount of knowledge in the world, and what we know right now is probabbly a small snippet of the total amount available. It may also point to more specifically how we interact with people, and how its important to go into situations with a blank slate and to not bring any assumptions into these conversations. Understanding that its very important to look and activly listen to the other persons opinion so that you get that helpful information is key to interacting with others.

student-39

Casper

It is important before adopting the puppy to try and find out where it had came from. If the puppy had been lost by an owner it is important to locate the owner and give the puppy back. This can be done in multiple ways, such as using social media and posters around the neighborhood. In the mean time the person can hold the puppy and take care of it by taking it to the vet for a checkup, until he hears back from the owner, if at all.

student-265

Casper

I believe that Charlie is not overreacting by being worried. Charlie's brother is in a difficult situation, because his intentions are good - to raise money for his local hospital by selling food/drinks. He may not want to get a permit because he wants to raise money as quickly as possible, and simply may not know the process of getting a permit. Moreove,r h emay need an adult supervisor for the activity. However, I believe it is Charlie's responsibility to tell his brother that although his intension are good, there is a reason the rules are in place - it protects his brother in case anyone gets hurt, and assures that he can continue to sell products. Charlie should offer his brother to help him get the permit, find an adult supervisor if necessary, and cover any costs associated with the permit. This way, Charlie's brother can prepare for a scenario in which someone asks him to shut down his business.

student-14

Casper

Since homeowners' property is considered private property, what happens on their land is their responsibility. I think if homeowners are unable to pay for such costs there should be options for subsidies to ensure that the animal and people around do not get harmed.

student-703

Casper

I would approach Amy privately and communicate my mistake to her. I would tell her that I really do appreciate the work she does for our company, state the things that she did well, and apologize deeply (telling her that it was an honest mistake).

student-567

Casper

This scenario requires balancing ethics with professionalism. It is unclear the nature of my relationship to my co-worker, if this has happened before, and the overall team dynamic. On one hand, it is unethical to claim someone else's ideas as your own and receive praise for it; speaking up would award praise and credit the right person. On the other hand, it may be viewed as unprofessional to speak up and interrupt the meeting with this issue. I would try to handle this professionally while making it clear that I developed the idea, for example by politely asking Luca questions about the idea that he would not be able to answer, and I could step in to suggest things. I would also have an open discussion with Luca after the meeting about why he took my idea and how we can move forward as team members.

student-34

Casper

Sarah should first have a non-judgemental and empathetic conversation with him to understand why he is lacking in his work. If there is a personal issue or an issue that he may need support with Sarah can ask how best the company can support their employee and possibly consider delegating tasks until his situation gets better. If it is a matter of lack of interest or that he does not enjoy working at the company anymore, Sarah should break the news to him herself and have an open and honest conversation about why he is letting him go. This way he has the chance to understand where he has gone wrong and improve in the future.

student-52

Casper

No, following the laws is a perfectly reasonable thing to be worried about. Although Charlie's brother is doing a noble thing by trying to help the hospitalized kids, attaining a permit would be the right thing to do. Therefore, Charlie should make that clear to his brother and try to help him get the permit. If no permit is attained, the stand could be shut down and fine might be imposed. This would lead to having the opposite consequences as Charlie's brother would not be able to help the kids as much as he could have if he got the permit and made the stand a legal one.

student-399

Casper

The reason homeowners have to pay for it is because it's not something that happens to everyone, it happens to a small portion of the population. Therefore, if every taxpayer had to pay for it through their taxes, a large population may become upset because they feel that they are paying for an issue that doesn't happen often - even if it happens more than they are aware of.

student-423

Casper

Cheryl should be concered with the wellbeinfg if her patent and the stress it well cause on her firned if she was going to message her about his cancer. It is always important to first gather more information before reaching a conclusion. In this case, it'd be best if she talks to the grandfather and asks him if he wants his family members to know or not since it is his right. If he doesn't want them to know, then it is best that Cheryl doesn't message her friend breach his rights. IF he does, then it would be fine if she messaged her and tol her the bad news and helped both of them with this istuaion.

student-397

Casper

I would talk to her and ask her about the stressors at home to see if her parents are going through a very stressful and difficult time. I would explain to her that my concerns is her health and safety and that her being at home is not safe and she is getting hurt. I would try to convince her to let me talk to her parents to get to know the situation better. I would also ask her what else she wants me to do to make sure she feels supported, safe, and is in good health.

student-146

Casper

It is important to keep calm and limit outwardly negative or judgemental reactions towards my supervisor because I am not certain they are intoxicated, and if they are intoxicated a negative reaction from me could worsen their mental and emotional state. I would ask them if they are intoxicated and if they are, I would gently suggest that they take the day off work as they are not fit to see patients in that state, and then proceed to inform someone higher-up about the situation. If they do not comply with my suggestions or are not willing to admit they are intoxicated, I would take my concerns to a higher up and let them deal with the situation.

student-308

Casper

In order to encourage the residents with dementia, I would make sure that they feel included. I would give them words of encouragement and advice for their game. If this went on to become too frustrating for the residents, I would suggest another game that everyone might enjoy that is less taxing on them.

student-454

Casper

by using performance enhancing drugs, michelle is acting unethically and has an unfair advantage compared to those who are actually training hard for the race I understand that Michele is going through a difficult time and the money would really help her and her mother, and that the stress of the situation may be affecting her judgement however this sets a dangerous standard that it is okay to cheat and lie if it can somehow be justified by the goal I would explain this to Michelle and encourage her to either admit to her actions or withdraw from the race if she still wants to run the marathon, I would encourage her not to take the money if she refuses to do so, I would feel obligated to report her so that the race is fair for other runners, who may also need the money for significant reasons

student-245

Casper

I think this is a very complex issue. As an immigrant myself, I come from a country where circumcision is encourages however since coming to Canada I have foundt that this is not widely the case. I could understand while to some outlawing circumcision would be considered discrimination giving is cultural and d=religion implications. However on the otherhand, I could see why the government had outlawed circumcision based on doing whats best for society. I think that this situation might heavily depend on how greatly an individual values this practice, to understand if it may be considered discrimination and if it may not be.

student-141

Casper

I realize there exist a power dynamic between my boss and I and he has some power over me. I woudl approach my boss and ask if he has proof over why he believes I stole the money. if he does not have proof and is still adamant on me stealing the money, I would reach out to HR and let them know the situation. If no change has been made I would resign. I woudl not feel comfortable and be able to work to the best of my ability when my intergeity has been questioned by my own boss.

student-236

Casper

Although the way Jessica's parents are treating her is completely wrong and unjust, I understand how Jessica's concern on being sent to a foster home. However, I believe that I must take action, as child abuse should be taken seriously. I would first talk to Jessica in a private and empathetic manner, and let her know that I am sorry for everything that she is going through. I would then stress to her that her family situation is not okay and that her parents are not treating her well. I would validate her concerns, but also let her know that she could be much happier in a different environment, with caretakers that treat her properly. I would also offer my assistance in the matter to ensure that she will be taken care of differently.

student-121

Casper

Recognizing that this is a violation of integrity and a major moral dilemma, I would tell my friend that plagiarism is never okay and can be very harmful to his record. I would also mention that it is unfair to the other students who dedicated time to writing the lab themselves. I would encourage him to contact the teacher and ask for extended him instead of submitting the plagiarized work. I would help them draft an email to their professor if they needed help doing so.

student-384

Casper

Unfortunately, I do not believe there is a way to fix this. As a student, we are given ample opportunity to get rid of any aids before an exam begins and are often told several times to place any non-transparent items such as water bottles and pouches on the floor. From the perspective of the professor, there is no way of telling which students are cheating and which ones just made a mistake, as in my case. Regardless, I would try to explain my situation to the professor via a private meeting while also acknowledging that I do not expect them to revert my fail.

student-191

Casper

It would not be a religious discrimination for a store to not offer because the store may only supply certain things. for example if it wasn't a food store it wouldn't purposely not have pasta to discriminate a religion.

student-671

Casper

This is hard because it is a procedure with a high number of risks but also medical decisions should be up to you and the government should not intervene. I ultimately think this would not technically be religious discrimination against me because it is applied to all people and is supported by empirical evidence that the procedure is dangerous. Before this kind of policy is put in place however it should be ensured that there is not religious biases in the policy makers that would cause them to move to pass this without considering the entirety of the evidence and the disadvantage that it places on people with differing religious beliefs.

student-66

Casper

I would first apologize to all the employees and then privately talk to each employee that I have to lay off. To do this I would tell them that I understand that this puts them in a difficult scenario but I would offer them all the support that they need getting a new job. For example, I would write the recommendation letters, I would try to find them interviews at new companies, and I would offer them some kind of financial support from what the company can afford.

student-433

Casper

As a store manager i will try to talk to Kevin about this matter privately rather than embarassing him in front of others. This in my opinion is a very delicate situation so I will be careful at my choice of words and my demeanor. I will enquire about Kevin situation and the well being of his family and does he needs any help from me regarding his financial constraints. If he tells me he needs help and was shy to ask abou it , then i will assure him that he is a good employee and he can share his problems with me. I will mention about the missing bread packets and will tell him to be more frank about it in future rather than getting into an ugly situation.

student-639

Casper

I started with giving a compliment so the other person does not feel as if I am insulting them or feel overwhelmingly negative about themselves. Then I told them in a non-judgemental and kind manner what they could improve on. The language I used was very specific, steering clear of words like \"wrong\" or \"bad\" and instead using more positive words such as \"work on\" or \"improve\". This is important so the other person is not offended and more willing to accept my feedback. I also emphasized that it is definitely possible for them to improve, and they are not inherently bad at the task.

student-546

Casper

In this case the intervation of a proffesion is necessary as the wellbieng of the animal and the house owned is hte most importat. THat being the case it has to be taken into account that the economical conditions of the home ownes could be affected by the predense of this animals. If the animals were there often I would propse to create a fund that would help the house owners for a low price. If it is not frequent at all getting a proffesional form afar would be necessary. Either way it is always important to take care of the animals and the people and a price should not be in the way of someones wellbeing.

student-84

Casper

If the teens didn't know they were on private property, I would give them a warning and let them know it can't happen again. If the teens knew they were on private property or didnt care, then I would fine them the necesary amount.

student-698

Casper

This is a dilemma since John should respect the law but it's also incredibly important for the lady to make her medical appointment - she may have imoprtant medical concerns that require urgent attention and waiting may cause her to have a poor outcome. In these situations, I think its important to look for alternatives in which both criteria can be met, and perhaps stopping the bus and asking fellow passengers if anyone has a spare ticket to help this woman out could provide a solution. In y experience, people are often eager to help in these cases. If I were in John's shoes, and none of the passengers offer to help, I would either purchase the ticket myself or allow this lady to come on the bus at no charge, as I believe the medical situation necessitates this potential infringmenet here.

student-416

Casper

If the test bank contains questions from this class which we were not supposed to access, or which infringe upon academic misconduct, then I will not purchase the test bank as I do not wish to engage in any form of cheating, malpractice or inappropriate academic behaviour even if I was struggling.

student-329

Casper

My primary concern would be the wellbeing of and maintaining fairness to the employees who will be laid off. i would first want to apologize and remain respectful and understanding of their emotions and feelings that they may experience while announcing the news. I would be transparent about the concern that has been raised, and assure them that i will do whatever is in my hands to resolve this issue as soon as possible so that they can start working at the earliest possible time. I would let them know that I am available if they would like to chat furtherr about this or they have any questions.

student-575

Casper

I would inform the teens, in a kind, understanding manner, that they are trespassing private property. I would give them time to explain themselves - maybe one of them is related to the owner of the land and would be able to obtain permission from them. If they didn't know the owner, I would notify the teens that they are subject to a minimum fine for trespassing, if they showed that they were not aware that they were on private property. I would also let them know that they are able to dispute the fine.

student-668

Casper

Because I know that they are lying I would talk to them in a passive manner and remind them about the situations of the group. By skipping you are disadvantage the other members who worked hard on their part and I want to show my friend the situations my group members are coming from. Lying is also not a good thing where integrity is important in society and their future. Building trust is a necessary skill and this can lead to bad habits. So I would ask them to come back and work on the assignment

student-459

Casper

this is diffcult situation and in this situation there are pros and cons for stop charging for electricity,. the pros are that it will allow people to get healthy nutrition as well as help with basic literacy skills by able to to read on the internet without concern for finances. the cons are that it can allows for overuse of electricity if there is no charge and can hurt the countrys economy and the supply. in this situation, there should be an alternative which is to decide based on the family financial status such as low families income should not be charged as much for electricity so that they can satisfy their basic needs, while higher income brackets familties should continue to pay for electricity so it wont allwo for oversue.

student-517

Casper

The conflict is between the wellbeing of Michelle's mother and the fairness of the race betwen the other competitors. Due to the policies of the national race, I would be required to report her, however, I would confront Michelle in a kind manner without judgment and encourage that she withdraws from the competition if she were to use the PEDs to allow her autonomy. If she agrees I would encourage her decision and let her know that she is doing the right thing, if she does not agree I would report her to keep the race fair.

student-233

Casper

Both sides have good points. On one hand it is important to support business owners in every way possible in order to create jobs for the people and have a thriving economy. Business owners take risks in order to start their businesses and if they fail, it is them who take the hardest falls rather than the employees. On the other hand it is true that the employees gain no advantage through this system, and they would feel left out of the advantages. I would however have to agree that the benefits outweight the cons as the risks associated with starting a business are heavily weighed on the owners side.

student-596

Casper

First, I would want to gather more information about what is happening. Is the person searching for something they lost in the garbage can? Is the items not really garbage but maybe a personal belonging the person accidentally dropped? If the person did intentionally throw garbage on the grass, then I would want to approach the person in a friendly, non-judgemental manner and let them know what I saw. I would politely ask the person to pick up their garbage to keep the park clean for everyone else. If the person refuses and walks away, then I would pick the garbage myself if it was appropriate (e.g. if I had gloves, or a tissue) because I believe it is a ethical obligation of citizens to look after the park.

student-156

Casper

Political views may differ. Having one political view doesn't make a person worse than someone who has a different political view. in a work environment, it is important that we accept others irrespective of their political views. We need to accept diversity as having differing opinions has been proven helpful in many cases. Hence, just having a differing view than my supervisor will never convince me to change a job if I am not treated differently or forced to change my opinions.

student-334

Casper

It has become a common occurance that students especially feel the only way they can be compretitve in the workfield or when applying to graduate school is the need to have volunteer experience. I have felt this way myself. therefore, I believe many people would take this statment as showing how students are feeling pressure to only volunteer for the sake of having it on their resume rather than volunteering out of the goodness of their heart.

student-421

Casper

One likely reason may be that the public does not see these people in action - they work behind the scenes making sure everything is safe and running smoothly. On the other hand, healthcare workers are individuals people see often for personal care.

student-296

Casper

Homeowners must pay for it as this ensures that the animals are treated in the safest manner possible. To have trained professionals remove and re-locate the raccoons, there will be associated costs to the organizations tasked with removal.

student-637

Casper

Kevin should have a private conversation with the employee so that both cna be comfortable to speeak the truth. once he has him in this private room, he should explain what he has seen on the camera and then ask kevin why he is stealing,in an open manner so he can understand the situaion better.

student-503

Casper

This is a difficult situation that requires evaluation. From the perspective of the man, it may seem that the healthcare worker is wearing scrubs that may be contaminated and could potentially spread a disease to those around him. Whereas the healthcare worker may be wearing clean scrubs, possibly on their way to work. It is important that there is clarification before assuming. It is valid that man is concerned for the well-being of himself and those around him, however the man did not try to get any clarification. Instead, the man confronted the healthcare worker in public, sharing his concerns with others. While the response of the healthcare worker may have been unwarranted, I believe the person who confronted the healthcare worker is in the wrong. He based his actions on a preconceived notion that he did not attempt to clarify.

student-24

Casper

I would get involved since this is my friend, and I care about them. During one of our breaks, I would ask to talk with her in a private place and explain what I saw. I'd ask what happened, what her reasoning was, and say how out of character it seemed. Then, I would encourage her to either put the money back if this was the first occurrance and no damage had been done, or to report herself to the boss. Eventually, the boss is likely to find out when counting cash at the end of the night, and many cahsiers are watched on video camera regardless. Rather than her be fired outright, explaining herself may give her the chance to come back from her mistakes. Instead of stealing, I'd plead that maybe she could take on more hours, or I could help her find a second job.

student-90

Casper

yes i would drive away. If no one else is affected, I see no reason to stay. Reporting this incident would needlessly waste time and involve my insurance company when this effects no one else.

student-704

Casper

The first thing I would feel is sympathy for the homeless individual, while I understand that the manager may have had previous eperience and reasons for kicking this customer out, I would feel concern if they are innocent and are being treated unfairly. Therefore, my concerns at the moment is making sure that this homeless individual is being treated justly, gaining more information about the situation, and my professional obligation to adhere to my supervisor's wishes and a consideration of their perspective.

student-147

Casper

Yes. This is a breach of privacy. I WOULD STOP THEM AND GENTLY ASK WHY THEY ARE ITNRESTED IN GOING THROUGHT HEIR PHONES. If their reason is for a social gag, then I would gently explain how it may go in the wring direction and how it is a breach of privacy. I would aslo temidn him or her how it would affect the friednship. if its is seriousissue and the person is trying to acces the phoien becuase of emergency I WOULD FFER MY OHOEN FOR EMERGNECY USE BUT SINCE THE PERSON IS NO THERE USING THEIR PHOEN IS UNETHICAL.

student-364

Casper

I would first empathize with her feeling of lonliness as I understand that getting older may be hard for many, as they do not see people as regularly. I would tell her how much I would love to see her but explain that I have a very important exam that I need to study for. I would tell her that we should make a plan for something after my exam and that way she can look forward to seeing me, knowing it is planned. I can then study for my exam without feeling stressed about the time taken away for me to go see her.

student-223

Casper

Initially, I may be tempted to tell him to immediately drop out to help take care of his mother. However, if I were to approach this calmly and objectively, dropping out may have lots of consequences for my friend such as having to reapply to school or to find another career path. I would first help him review his options first and only suggest dropping out of school as a last resort when there is no other option available.

student-29

Casper

This is a difficult and complex scanerio in which the customer is rasing their voice, distrubting other customers during their shopping and my employee reponds inappropriately. Here, I must address both the customer in their tone of speech and also my employee in how they respond. I would approach the conversation in a calm manner and first ask the customer what is the current situation. After they explain this, I would then ask my employee what they think has happened.

student-341

Casper

This situation would be difficult for Kevin, as he will not be able to find anything he can buy in this store, while staying loyal to his religion. However, it is also not the obligation of the store to appeal to everybody who walks in. As long as Kevin is treated well in this store, this would not constitute of religious discrimination, since after all, Kevin could buy pasta at another store.

student-531

Casper

No, I don't believe that they should be laid for that specific purpose. The hospital is a very complex environment and requires many people's expertise. So, even if their teaching skills aren't up to par, their clinical skills can still be used to help other patients who are at the hospital.

student-663

Casper

My boss could not trust me and believes that I don't have integrity, which is not true, but I can't prove it.

student-686

Casper

je comprends que ma situation est difficile et que je ne veux pas arriver en retard à mon examen et que je suis très stressée, mais je comprends aussi qu'il faut adhérer aux règlements de la ville. il se pourrait que parker dans ces rues soit interdits durants ces heures car ça bloquerait la circulation de bus ou de d'autres véhicules. ainsi, j'éviterais de me stationner dans les rues. j'essayerais de trouver d'autres solutions telles que me stationner un peu plus loin et de courir, ou de contacter un ami qui pourrait s'occuper de mon auto pour moi, etc. je pourrais aussi contacter mon professeur et espérer qu'il comprendrait ma situation et accepterais quelques minutes de retard.

student-80

Casper

first of all i will wait for the class to finish before going to talking to her as i don't want other students to distract while doing their exams because then it would be unfair to them, i would talk to her in a private room in a calm way tell her that i witnessed the cheating i would first day that i understand that she really wants to have a good mark but it is the wrong way to succeeds, and i'd tell her it is unfair to other students and even to herself as by cheating she is abandoning all her efforts away, i would then encourage her to report to the teacher

student-331

Casper

I would first ask Hazel more about her symptoms, when they appeared, what they felt like etc. If she does not admit to lying I would ask her how her schooling is going and if anything there is bothering her. This would allow her to be honest about the situation and come clean on her own. If she admits to lying about being sick to miss school I would offer her resources such as a tutoring program taht I am aware of and some words of inspiration for her but explain that I am not allowed to give out a false diagnosis.

student-149

Casper

no, i don't think the hospital should treat the father in a different matter, one thing follow in the hospital, actually not only in the hospital but in the society, is equity, whether the donor has given 5 million to hospital or not he or she should always have the same procedure that other patients have be given because i think that this donation does not have a link to the treatment.

student-432

Casper

I would do my best to accoomdate her wishes into my schedule as I care about my grandmother's mental health, especially if she says she is lonely. Perhaps I just need to study more before I go out with her so that I can feel prepared for my exam while also be available for the outing. However, if I need to prepare more for the test I may ask her to reschedule but generally I believe I can either study more before the test or take some time off from sleeping as much so that she feels she is cared for.

student-326

Casper

No. I belive that instilling equity into a child's life is important. I would educate my child on the I'm[oratcne of realizing differences in financial status, social status and work status, however, deep inside we are all individuals and we all feel the same emotions and similar interests in life. If my 'poor' child had the same interests as the 'rich' one and enjoyed spending time with him for who he is and not what he owns, i would be a very proud parent.

student-192

Casper

This is a difficult situation that brings up the issues of ethics, communication and leadership. I understand why a government would make a decision like outlawing circumcision for the benefit of individuals in general, however I also empathize with the religion that dictates circumcision. I think that this situation is one in particular that is difficult to a draw a line because some religions that dictate circumcision dictate it at birth, when the individual does not have the choice. I do think that outlawing circumcision is considered religious discrimination, but there could be specific situations & ways of working around this for everyone to be safe.

student-60

Casper

bien que je comprends que cheryl voudrait le dire à son amie car elle voudrait lui informer de cette situation au plus vite, puisque cest une grande révélation. ceci pourrait donner à son ami loccasion de passer plus de temps avec son grand pere plus tot et contribuerais à renforcer la confiance entre cheryl et son ami. toutefois, je ne crois pas que cest la place de cheryl de révéler cette information. en effet, meme si elle ne fait qu'observer l'oncologue, elle devrait respecter la confidentialité des patients. aussi, elle n'est pas formée pour délivrer ce genre de nouvelle dévastateur, et elle devrait laisser le professionel le faire de manière appropriée. il se pourrait aussi que le grand pere lui même n'ait pas encore décidé sil veut révéler cette nouvelle à cet instant ou non.

student-76

Casper

No I do not. I think that leadership is an important quality to consider when assessing on who gets into proffessional schools, regardless of whether they promote the practice in the professional schools or not. Being a leader also demonstrates strong communication skills and any student entering a professional program should be able to communicate. For example, doctors and veterinarians communicate with people on a daily basis. If a student applying is not able to communciate affectively, they are not fit for the position.

student-328

Casper

Parking is typically more expensive in areas where they know that more money can be made and the targeted audience is more willing to pay for this. Higher parking keeps a large portion of people out. This in turn makes sure there is no overcrowding/traffic and such. However, I do see how this can seem discriminatory of people that are not able to afford it.

student-374

Casper

I would discuss the situation with my supervisor and take full responsibility over the situation. I would apologize for not controlling access to the social media platform and inform him of steps I would take to mitigate the situation. I would then brainstorm possible solutions with my team and my supervisor to ask about ways to address the situation.

student-513

Casper

I would first make sure my friend feels safe. I woudl try to take them away from the crowd and then ask them how they are feeling. I would then ask her if the person video taping her made her feel uncomfrtable. If she says yes i would ask her what she would like to do about it. If she does not want to do anything I would offer to give her a ride home or to stand with her away from the crowd and continue with our day. if she wants the person to delete the photos, then if it is safe, i would apparoach the indidudal. I would let them knwo the situation and then ask them to either edit the part where my friend is in it or delete the video. If they do not accept I woudl thank them and approach lcoal authorities as I do not want to put myself or my friend in danger

student-199

Interview

In this scenario with a patient with Down syndrome who is pregnant, my role as a healthcare provider is to advocate for my patient's wishes first and foremost. I appreciate the parents' perspective advising abortion, and will communicate I understand their view. However, I must uphold professional standards and prioritize my patient's autonomy. I would have an open conversation to ensure she has fully considered all options and implications involved. My goal is complete transparency so she can make a fully informed decision. Ultimately it is her choice, and I will support whatever she decides after thoughtful reflection. This reminds me of a high school friend's experience choosing a university. She wanted to attend York University nearby, but her parents pushed for farther options like Waterloo or McMaster. As her friend, I reinforced that this was her decision - she knew what would make her happiest and I advocated for her autonomy, despite her parents' strong opinions. My role was empowering her to make the choice for herself as an adult. Similarly here, while I will listen to parental concerns, my duty is to my patient. I will ensure she examines the situation comprehensively, then back her fully informed decision, whatever it may be. My priority is empowering my patient's self-determined choice.

student-785

Interview

The prompt is to discuss gambling in the larger sense and its implications for society. There are a lot of pros and cons to gambling. It is seen as a recreational activity - it can bring people together, give them something to do, be a stress reliever, or just fun if you go to a casino or buy a lottery ticket. Those are considered forms of gambling that can be harmless. However, gambling also has significant downsides in that it can become addictive. Once addicted, it is very difficult to break the habit and can impact not just the gambler but their family and friends. It's difficult for addicted gamblers to see when they cross a line. Addiction is an illness that needs to be treated as such. If someone with a gambling problem asks you for money, it's important not to give in right away. You need to convey worry for what they'll do with the money. Remain calm and not argumentative or accusatory - that doesn't help in these situations. Approach delicately. Recommend solutions - say you're coming as a supportive friend who has looked into resources that can help, some form of rehabilitation may be necessary because you want them to avoid further harm. Identify you're trying to help, not control. Ultimately it is their choice to seek help, but your role is to facilitate that discussion and encourage them to reach out. Gambling can have really detrimental impacts - I've heard of people losing homes, affecting family. I don't think the pros ever outweigh the cons. It can become a very harmful habit. I personally don't enjoy gambling, so maybe I'm biased, but I recognize it can be fun and social for some. Organizations that run gambling have a duty to not promote unhealthy behavior and provide resources for those who become addicted. Friends and family have a duty to each other, and the community has a duty. But organizations like OLG have a responsibility to ensure they don't promote unhealthy habits and provide resources for gambling addiction.

student-812

Interview

This is a sensitive situation that requires compassion and transparency. As the surgeon who discharged a now deceased patient, the family deserves answers. First, I would thoroughly review the patient's file, my discharge notes, and consult other providers involved to understand the full context that led to discharging her. This will help me better explain my rationale to the grieving family. I would invite the family to meet in person if possible, or by phone/video if needed. Without making assumptions, I would let them express their feelings and ask questions without judgement. I understand their pain and confusion at losing someone they expected to recover. I would walk through the treatment plan, health status at discharge, and reasoning in simple, clear terms. If I cannot fully answer a question, I would connect them with a provider who can. Most importantly, I would acknowledge the enormous difficulty for the family, validating their emotions. I would offer as much support as I can, meeting again if desired, and connecting them with counseling/community resources during this devastating time. My priority is being transparent about decisions made, while also providing compassion and support to help the family through grief over losing their loved one. Open communication and empathy are essential.

student-789

Interview

I think that this is a clear scenario of unprofessionalism. As a doctor, I have the patient's best interest at heart and have to follow the principle of beneficence. Although the relationship could be good for the patient, an intimate relationship between a doctor and patient is unprofessional and could impact the patient's care. The patient may be more inclined to follow a certain treatment just because the physician recommended it, which could affect their health outcomes. I would first have a private conversation with my colleague to understand the situation fully. I would not want to jump to conclusions or accuse them of something untrue. In our discussion, I would share my observations and ask questions to learn more, like how long the relationship has lasted, how serious it is, and if they are considering marriage. Based on the answers, I would decide what to do next. There are consequences to my colleague's actions. If it has been a long, serious relationship, I would consult the clinic's ethical policies to see if such relationships are allowed, and under what conditions. If so, I may have the patient switch doctors since it is still unprofessional. Or if they met outside the clinic and plan to marry, perhaps they can continue dating as the policies permit. If it seems more casual, I would encourage my colleague to speak with HR for guidance, and likely end the relationship if HR agrees it is inappropriate. I would follow up to ensure the situation is handled properly, and support my colleague through the process. Ultimately, I cannot make a unilateral decision without considering all factors and clinic policies. But I would aim to address this ethically and professionally.

student-792

Interview

This is obviously a very complex dilemma with no easy comprehensive solution that satisfies all stakeholders. The primary conflict is balancing free speech versus safety and well-being of users when social media platforms restrict or remove content deemed discriminatory or offensive. On one hand, allowing individuals to display any content exercises their right to free speech. However, this risks making parts of the user base feel unsafe or lose those users entirely, which impacts revenue. So platforms have to determine which content is truly discriminatory or offensive enough to warrant restricting. If content is designed to intentionally hurt certain groups, then removing it is warranted. But content not meant to be hurtful, even if offensive to some, requires more consideration before removal. There is no universally correct solution yet, as evidenced by cancel culture debates. Perspectives of free speech advocates and vulnerable groups like BIPOCs and LGBTQ+ must be balanced, which is extremely difficult. Personally, I would prioritize user safety on a social media platform, even at some cost to free speech. If content is likely to be broadly harmful if proliferated, removing it is reasonable. The top priority should be ensuring all users feel safe, welcome, and able to express themselves. So I agree with removing intentionally harmful content. But possibly offensive content requires more discussion before removal. Well-being of all users should be the number one priority for social media platforms.

student-768

Interview

Deciding to pursue medicine and become a doctor is a big decision and it requires a lot of effort and takes a lot of time. I have thought very carefully about why I want to be a doctor and I have three main reasons. First, I want to be a lifelong learner. I chose to study at the University of Toronto for my undergraduate degree, particularly in neuroscience, because the field is so broad, there are so many different directions you can go with it. I was able to learn from some of the leading researchers in the field at the University of Toronto. Even after I finished my program requirements and could have just taken easier electives for the rest of my degree, I chose to pursue extra courses at the higher levels, like 400 and 300 level, because I'm really passionate about education. I want to learn as much as I can, and I even took six courses a semester, which is more than usually considered full time, because I wanted to get the most out of the education offered by the University of Toronto and learn as much as I can while enrolled there. Being a doctor is one of the only careers where you get to be a student forever, and you also get to apply your knowledge every single day, which is not something that many other academics get to do. So this is one of the main reasons why I would like to be a doctor. Second, I love forming relationships with people and maintaining them over a long period of time. Even just in the past year where I've been working and volunteering at the same hospital, I've been able to see the same patients every week for a year. It has been so rewarding and fulfilling to be able to see their progress and be able to contribute to their care every week. I think that this is a very unique opportunity. While some other members of the healthcare team are able to form some sort of lifelong relationship with patients like therapists or maybe nurse practitioners, physicians get to do this the most and to the highest level of depth, and you really get to know your patients. I am a person who loves human connection, and I love being able to help people and see their progress as I help them. So being a doctor would allow me to do this every day. Lastly, I'm really passionate about advocating for equal access to health care and equal quality of health care, regardless of one's socioeconomic, cultural or racial background. Currently, I do see some gaps in this. In Canada, even in the place where I volunteered, I found that many of the programs offered were Western-centric and didn't provide as much benefit to patients from Asia, Africa and other parts of the world. For example, I was once shadowing an occupational therapist who was teaching an elderly man with a TBI how to use the kitchen with a walker. Unfortunately, they didn't have the abrasive spices and ingredients that he would normally use at home. Instead, they had eggs, which he actually couldn't eat. So I used my knowledge of Asian culture because of my own background to try and figure out what kind of ingredients he uses in his household. We tried to simulate that with whatever we had, but obviously it wasn't an exact match, and it would have been more helpful to have a wider array of ingredients available. Another example is when doing music therapy, they would often play songs more popular in America and Canada, but not other areas. So when I see Asian patients, I try to ask them what kind of music they're used to listening to, and encourage the music therapist to play music similar to that, so it's more culturally relevant. So I think being a physician is the only profession where I could be a lifelong learner who advocates for people's health and forms lifelong relationships with patients. That is why I want to be a doctor.

student-805

Interview

Yeah. So of course, since the medical admissions process is so long and tough, I have thought about other career plans. For example, I wanted also to be an engineer because actually a lot of people tell me that those are very different career paths but I actually don't think so. I think that they have a lot of similarities. For example, both in medicine and in engineering, you have to be able to communicate your thoughts clearly and patiently. The engineer has to communicate with his colleagues and with the client and make sure that he can explain everything in simple terms so that everybody understands and is comfortable with what the prognosis will be. The doctor too, has to talk in a simple manner with the patient and he has to make sure that he's very well understood because the patient's treatment is at risk. Also, I think in both careers you need to have an analytic brain, which is something I have because I can analyze things very quickly. For example, when I was in a biology class, the teacher said something and it automatically clicked in my brain that it contradicted something she had said earlier. So I wanted to ask her the question and she told me that it was a mistake. As I said, I'm very able to find when something is not making sense because I have an analytical brain and critical thinking. I think both engineers and doctors have to diagnose and establish a prognosis. Well, they both require critical thinking because sometimes you have to be able to not be so gullible and to actually think for yourself instead of listening to others. Also, I think the main difference between the two is that engineers will require less empathy than doctors, which is why I want to go into medicine and not anymore into engineering because I'm someone who's very empathetic and who can really feel what somebody's feeling and put myself in their shoes. For example, when my friend was really sad one day, I was there for her and I could actually feel her pain and I started crying with her. And also through helping my father, who's sick with multiple sclerosis, I actually could develop and just put forward my empathy, because I always had to know when something was uncomfortable for him, and I helped him through it. And I could also talk with him and figure out what went wrong, why he's sad. And I could always encourage him, and he always felt better afterwards. So this is why I want to go into medicine and not into engineering because I have empathy and I want to use it because I love reassuring people and simply putting a smile on people's faces after they've been sad.

student-796

Interview

The issue here is that if she continues this behavior, she will likely get an undeserved high grade, which is unfair to other students. However, I understand the pressures she faces to get a high GPA for medical school admission. I would approach her privately in a non-confrontational manner to gather more information on her motivations. If it was solely to get a high GPA, I would explain that this dishonest approach is unacceptable, but offer to help her find other interesting courses instead. If she agrees, I would gladly assist in finding an alternative. If she declines, I would urge her to confess to the professor so he can make appropriate adjustments. And if she refuses, I would inform the professor myself. I would apologize to her, but explain I must act with integrity. This allows us to maintain academic honesty while making an ethical decision before she improperly benefits.

student-723

Interview

In this situation, it's important to recognize that both participants are looking to win, yet there can only be one winner - which poses a big issue since the applicants appear equally strong. However, gathering more information about each project could reveal differences. For example, they may have different motivations or thought processes behind their projects. Although the content seems equally good, the reasoning and potential impact could differentiate the two. Furthermore, if one project is more organized or addresses a more recent problem, it may be better to choose that one since it is more current. Even if the presentations themselves are equal in the judges' eyes, exploring the projects more deeply could reveal compelling reasons to choose one over the other.

student-761

Interview

When I was younger, I tried out for many soccer teams but could never make it. The players treated me poorly, saying I wasn't good enough and making fun of me. At the time, I felt disrespected without understanding their perspective. The kids may not have known how to properly treat others and thought it was a joke. What I really gained from that situation is more significant than their actions. I learned to never give up. I kept going and eventually made a soccer team. This experience applies to becoming a doctor. There will be many hard times, so you must keep trying even when you lack confidence. Perseverance will make you a great physician able to provide excellent care. While the teasing was difficult, it taught me an important lesson that guides me to this day - never quit in pursuit of your goals.

student-724

Interview

If I found this individual to be problematic towards myself, I might feel the need to bring this to their attention. However, if their behavior is affecting others more than myself, I would consult with them before bringing it to the individual's attention. I would want to engage in a private, open-ended dialogue to better understand their perspective. Perhaps it is a misunderstanding, or they are unaware of being stuck in their own perspective. My goal would be to kindly educate them and help them realize how their actions impact other group members and myself. If they left the group after our discussion, it would be unfortunate to lose a strong contributor. However, I would not feel at fault since I did what seemed necessary after consulting others - it would have been a collective decision. I could reach out after their departure to gain their perspective and hear their side, then potentially rectify the issue by mutually agreeing they return. Or, I may need to acknowledge and accept their departure, wish them the best, and part ways.

student-759

Interview

In this complex situation, I would prioritize personal safety while looking out for the homeless individual's wellbeing. Rather than chasing the two girls and risking harm, I would stay with the individual, empathize by asking about their situation and experiences. I would inquire if they've raised this as a concern to authorities and offer assistance in doing so if desired. Providing emotional support and legal guidance within my abilities could help. If the individual wants assistance in reporting this mistreatment, I would help navigate that process with authorities. My focus is avoiding an unsafe confrontation while assisting this mistreated person in finding a constructive resolution. Listening compassionately and advising them on options to address this recurring issue is likely the most prudent course of action.

student-740

Interview

This is a tricky situation as I understand both sides of the family, and it's a very big decision that will impact many people including the family and baby. I grasp the father's perspective - if she proceeds, she can focus on her career and provide financially for the family. I also see the mother's concern about potential health risks to the baby from in vitro fertilization. I would first approach the older sister privately and non-confrontationally to gather more details on her motivations. I would suggest she research the scenario further to make a more informed choice. I would urge her to consult others she cares about for input. I would offer to help care for the baby if she decides to proceed. This allows us to come to a thoughtful decision while exploring options and impacts. By gathering more information and perspectives, we can support her through an ethical process to reach the best outcome.

student-725

Interview

That's very true. There are many careers where you're able to help people through different aspects of their life, I think. However, it's not so much that. I think medicine is just in a very unique position where you are able to not only take the latest in science, which is something I'm very passionate about, but you're also able to apply that to the human body. You're able to use that information to help people with their health and to help people who are in their most vulnerable times. So I think it's that combination of using science - the latest science - along with being able to work directly with people that makes me want to pursue a career in medicine. The personal, human aspect is so important to me because I think it's a real privilege to be able to work with people and help them understand what they're going through when they are suffering from an illness. You're able to help them understand potential treatment options and enable them to make the most informed decisions about their care. The opportunity to work alongside patients at such a crucial time is an enormous responsibility, but also extremely fulfilling and rewarding. It's the kind of positive impact I want to have on people's lives. For example, when my grandmother with Alzheimer's was living with us, I took it upon myself to help her with her medications. My grandmother would wake us up around three in the morning, crying and thinking she was going to die. No one could console her until I sat with her and explained that she just needed to take her medication. I was able to work with her, to help her understand why she needed each medication - for her blood pressure and for the Alzheimer's. She took multiple medications and I saw the huge impact it had on her when I was able to get her to take them. It would take a while, but eventually she would take the medication, start to feel better, and be able to go back to sleep. You could see how much it meant to her. And in my role as an emergency room scribe, I get to see physicians connect with patients daily. I observe them use their medical knowledge to help people recover and return to their normal lives. That connection with patients at such vulnerable moments, along with the ability to truly make a difference in their lives, is what I want for my own career. It's something I look forward to as a future physician and that few other careers can provide.

student-716

Interview

I believe the issue of medical programs mandating a 2-3 year stay in rural northern Ontario is very important. The shortage of physicians in rural areas remains an ongoing debate that needs immediate attention, primarily due to the difficulty rural residents face accessing quality care amidst staffing shortages. In my opinion, integrating this mandatory rural stint after graduation could have both positives and negatives. First, it would significantly increase the physician presence in these areas. However, it risks physicians leaving to return to urbanized cities or suburbs nearer their families once the stint ends. This could cause physician numbers to spike then plummet. There's no guarantee of retention past 2-3 years. Yet some may find rural practice unexpectedly rewarding and remain. Overall, predicting an individual physician's actions is difficult given personal circumstances. Healthcare costs could also fluctuate if physician turnover is high, as lower staffing often increases prices. However, a continuous influx, even if temporary, can positively impact rural infrastructure and policies by adding expertise. In summary, the long-term implications past 2-3 years are uncertain. Further research into effective, sustainable solutions for rural retention is needed. While complex with many factors, deeper investigation and resources could drive real improvements in rural care. Mandated rural stints could help but require careful implementation to avoid instability.

student-762

Interview

In this scenario, there are two key stakeholders - elderly people who want to retain their right to drive, and the general public concerned about safety. I understand regulations are in place restricting elderly drivers due to declining vision and cognition, in order to protect public safety. However, I don't believe there should be a blanket rule banning driving at a certain age. Instead, each person's abilities should be evaluated individually. For instance, if an elderly driver can pass vision and reaction time tests and appears to have sufficient cognitive function to drive safely, they should not be categorically prevented from doing so. In medicine, a tailored approach is best rather than a one-size-fits-all policy. Each patient should be assessed based on their specific circumstances and capacities. With an individualized assessment, we can balance the interests of maintaining independence for the elderly while also protecting public welfare.

student-731

Interview

Leadership and communication skills are invaluable for healthcare providers. In my experience, the ability to communicate effectively engenders trust and rapport with patients. Skilled communicators can understand patients’ perspectives and establish meaningful relationships. Early in my volunteering at a family clinic, I recognized a need for better teamwork among volunteers. At first, we barely knew each other’s names. I decided to hold a meeting for us to introduce ourselves, share experiences, and align on how to collaborate productively. Although we each had leadership abilities, bringing them together enabled joint decision-making and unity. After coming together as a team, we worked much more efficiently. One doctor even noticed the dramatic improvement in our teamwork. We created a “code blue” to call for assistance when needed. Our meetings enabled understanding of each role, and incorporating our strengths allowed effective collaboration. Developing our individual leadership skills while also bonding as a unit was deeply inspiring. This experience showed me the tremendous value of communication, leadership, and teamwork in healthcare roles. It is something I will carry forward in my career.

student-786

Interview

As a physician in a position of authority navigating this complex issue, there are many factors to consider. Rather than directly advising based on personal opinions or biases, I would try to understand the family's full perspective. I would aim to grasp their personal, moral and ethical values, as well as any relevant cultural values. While not imparting any assumptions, I would assist them in whatever path they choose after thoughtful reflection. My role is not to provide a direct answer, but to encourage their process of making an informed decision aligned with their beliefs. By thoroughly listening rather than steering the family in a specific direction, I allow them to determine the course they feel is most appropriate based on their circumstances. My goal is to create an open and supportive environment for these difficult conversations.

student-739

Interview

This can be a challenging situation. Doctors want to promote life and want their patients to live long and spend time with family. However, we have to consider the patient's feelings and quality of life with a critical condition, which can be extremely difficult. I believe physician-assisted suicide could be ethically appropriate if the patient is making a fully informed decision and is aware of alternatives like palliative care and the impact on loved ones. If after thorough discussion and reflection the patient still feels strongly that assisted suicide is the right choice, and the physician is comfortable proceeding, they should be able to move ahead. The key is ensuring it is truly the patient's autonomous, informed choice, with full comprehension of all options. If those conditions are met, then physician-assisted suicide could be conducted ethically.

student-754

Interview

The core issue here is that if we don't intervene, the kids could continue assaulting this woman, which is highly unethical and dangerous. However, we need more information to properly address the situation. Some key questions: How often do these girls come by? Why are they hitting her - is the woman provoking them in some way? Is she potentially doing something illegal herself? There are a lot of unknowns to investigate first. I would approach the woman privately in a non-confrontational manner and ask for her perspective on the situation. If she reveals she is doing something illegal, I would likely have to report both parties to the proper authorities. However, if she is innocent, then we can look into reporting the assault by the girls to the police or appropriate powers, so official action can be taken. By thoughtfully intervening, we may be able to stop the assaults and protect the woman, which is an important responsibility as a bystander observing violence. But gathering more details first, rather than making assumptions, allows us to respond in the most fair, ethical manner for all involved. The goal is stopping harm while avoiding escalating the conflict further.

student-721

Interview

One time I disappointed my parents was when they asked me to pick up my sister from soccer practice. Both my parents were at work and had entrusted me with this responsibility. However, instead of diligently following through, I got distracted by other less urgent priorities like schoolwork and texting friends. As a result, my sister was left waiting alone at the field with no ride. My parents were very let down that I did not fulfill my duty responsibly. In hindsight, I should have prioritized better. The other tasks could have waited, but getting my sister on time was truly important. I learned an important lesson about setting the right priorities and fulfilling my obligations, especially when relying on me. Moving forward, I aim to match my actions to what matters most rather than getting distracted. I continue to feel regretful about that incident, but it helped reinforce values of responsibility and diligence that guide me today.

student-756

Interview

This is tricky because the patient needs the medication, so it must be administered despite potential side effects. I would first research the literature to understand what other patients have experienced and how side effects were mitigated. Taking a holistic approach to understand the patient's specific needs and lifestyle is key. For example, I have stomach issues myself and make dietary and behavioral changes to alleviate problems that certain medications can exacerbate. After learning about the patient's lifestyle and listening to their concerns, I can offer tailored solutions to manage side effects. To determine if treatment is worthwhile, I would weigh the pros and cons. I would make a detailed list of the benefits and risks to inform our decision. I would also consult other doctors about their experiences managing similar cases. Most importantly, I would have an open discussion with the patient about their preferences and priorities. They have autonomy in the decision, so it must be made jointly. Ultimately, if side effects accompany a treatment that is critical for their survival, I would move forward to provide the best possible care. By researching thoroughly, listening to the patient, and weighing all factors, we can make the most ethical, personalized treatment decision.

student-726

Interview

Thanks for the question. In this case, it's a very difficult scenario because while I care about this boy's well being and also want to ensure transparency and honesty when communicating with him, I also have to balance the importance of respecting his parents decision as well. The first thing I would do in this specific scenario is try to understand why the parents don't want to tell the twelve year old boy about the diagnosis. There are many possible reasons and I don't want to assume. It could be that it could damage him or hurt him psychologically. It could be that perhaps his mental wellbeing could adversely affect his physical health, or perhaps there might be a risk of self harm if that boy finds out he was diagnosed with a terminal illness. There are a multitude of reasons, and I would set up a private meeting with both of the parents to have an open and honest conversation regarding their concerns. After hearing their concerns, then I would probably help them share some alternatives. So I would also share my point of view. Specifically in this specific scenario, I can understand that the boy, if he doesn't know, he would not be able to make an autonomous choice since there is no minimum decision making capacity. If that boy has demonstrated comprehension as well as insight and demonstrated decision making capacity as a physician, it's also important to ensure that the boy can have an autonomous choice and make decisions that reflect his own personal values and beliefs. For example, his beliefs of continuing with the type of treatment and the types of side effects he's willing to endure might be completely different than that of his parents. So it's really important to have an open dialogue and understand the boys preferences in order to have him make an informed and autonomous decision making process. However, with the parents, they also have a concern and after gathering more information, I would try to and after sharing that with the parents on the boy's autonomy and ability to make an informed decision, I would try to again see the scenario. If the parents are concerned that the boy might self harm after finding out this news, then I would not tell the boy because that could be very dangerous to him and perhaps he needs some time to digest this information. However, if it is for perhaps alternative reasons such as the parents may not know how to disclose this news to the boy or they're not ready to do so yet, I would try to respect that. And if they want to disclose at a certain point, then I would help them in any way I can. Perhaps setting up a meeting with all of us. And perhaps I can disclose it, or his parents can disclose it, but being very sensitive about it while also to the boy explaining it in a way so that he can understand what a malignancy is and what are some of the consequences and repercussions. I think if this is a scenario, I would definitely encourage the parents to disclose the news to the boy so that we can also understand his values and preferences and help create care that is comprehensive and also takes into account his perspective while also helping him with therapy or other types of counseling so that he can digest and take in this information. So ultimately, in summary, my main concern here is again for the boys' wellbeing. I would first want to gather a lot more information from the parents on their primary concern as to why they don't want to disclose this means. I would then after listening to them share some of my concerns such as perhaps the boy. We're not integrating the boys will and autonomous allowing him to make an autonomous choice. And lastly, I would try to if there is no risk that this boy is involved in may self harm, then I would try to encourage the parents to share that with the boy and facilitate that conversation. So we are navigating that in a sensitive way. This is a very difficult topic in general because again there are no easy alternatives. However, it's really important to be patient and to acknowledge that since this boy is a minor, the parents may know something that I don't and so we need to respect that and respect the parents' decision.

student-833

Interview

The issue is that without participants, we won't obtain reliable vaccine results. However, that doesn't mean I or anyone should hastily take an unproven vaccine just because I'm an administrator. I would need to review policies to ethically proceed. Has this vaccine been through animal trials and shown safe for human testing? If not, I would not take it or administer it to others, as that could cause harm. However, if it has successfully passed initial safety studies, we would need to enroll participants in clinical trials under careful oversight. I could enroll myself to ethically test the vaccine's effects, but would not take an untested vaccine randomly. My role is ensuring we follow rigorous scientific protocols to safely develop and evaluate this vaccine prior to any deployment.

student-736

Interview

My understanding of activism is grassroots movements driven by communities to advocate for policies and programs that positively impact people's lives. I believe physicians and medical students have a role in this duty. As community leaders directly affecting health, doctors can influence public health so patients are cared for beyond the clinic. I understand the challenges. With the demands of staying current on medicine, taking on activism requires great commitment and emotional investment. However, much health progress has resulted directly or indirectly from activism - like reproductive justice advocacy. This promotes not just healthy pregnancies or safe child rearing, but reproductive choice including contraceptive and healthcare access. One way medical students and doctors can engage in activism is advocating for increased access to contraceptives and reproductive healthcare. They can also start public health initiatives to improve sex education, so teenagers gain better understanding of safe sex, changes to their bodies, and reproductive health. Physicians can play a vital role in launching programs to ensure patients get care and knowledge to advocate for themselves. While difficult, activism allows doctors to create positive change beyond treating individuals.

student-738

Interview

Working at a grocery warehouse was physically demanding. On many days after my shift, I felt like quitting. However, I strived to stay optimistic and focus on the light at the end of the tunnel. What motivated me to keep going back was both financial need and the potential opportunities. I imagined that if I stuck it out, I could build connections with supervisors and managers to eventually move up in the company. This long term thinking kept me from acting on the temptation to quit. With perseverance and networking internally, I was able to gain a Team Leader position which was less labor-intensive than my initial warehouse role picking and packing items. My optimism drove me to look beyond the present challenges and see a path forward. I learned that it's often worthwhile to persist through difficulty if longer term benefits are possible. By overcoming the physical demands through a positive mindset and relationship building, I was able to advance in that company.

student-779

Interview

Thank you for sharing this challenging situation. I appreciate you thoughtfully considering multiple perspectives - the patient, physician, and broader public. This appears to be an ethically complex scenario involving issues like conflict of interest, professionalism, and trust. I agree the ideal approach is to first have an open, non-judgmental dialogue with my colleague to better understand how this relationship developed. It's important we don't assume ill intent without details. I would want to know if my peer feels they can still objectively treat this patient, and discuss options like referring them to another provider to avoid any conflicts. Ultimately though, physicians should likely refrain from romantic relationships with current patients due to inherent power imbalances. If my colleague is unwilling to cease seeing the patient, I would need to escalate the matter professionally. Our duty is to deliver unbiased care, and an intimate involvement could jeopardize that. However, I would aim to handle this sensitively. There may be personal issues underlying my peer's choices. As physicians, we need to balance multiple duties - to patients, colleagues, and society. In this case, patient wellbeing should come first while also preserving my colleague's dignity. With open communication and discretion, I'm hopeful this situation could be resolved to uphold ethical standards. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-831

Interview

Throughout my life, I have helped care for my dad who has multiple sclerosis. His condition started worsening when I was around four or five years old, so I began assisting him at a young age. This experience has greatly developed my empathy. Even when my dad didn't explicitly ask for help, I could sense what he needed whether it was getting comfortable in bed, sitting up properly, or getting a glass of water. I learned to pay close attention to pick up on nonverbal cues. Through caring for my dad, I've become very attuned to others' health struggles and can truly empathize with their situations. There were also times when my dad's condition affected his mental health. During these difficult periods, I made an effort to communicate with him, show empathy, and reassure him that there is more to enjoy in life. He has told me this support helped tremendously, and now he is much happier and positive. I love bringing smiles to people's faces, so making my dad laugh and boosting his spirits is very rewarding. This experience taught me the importance of being there for others because you never know the impact your words and actions may have. I've learned to balance my own needs with caring for loved ones. As a future medical student, these skills of empathy, communication, and trust-building will be invaluable in developing rapport with patients. When patients feel heard, understood, and able to trust their provider, they are more likely to follow treatment recommendations. My lifelong experience caring for my dad has prepared me well for relating to future patients with compassion.

student-776

Interview

If I've been given responsibility to mediate a conflict between two people in the next room, I would first gather as much information as possible about the situation from both parties. I would make sure to listen closely to each side with compassion, empathy, and an aim to understand both perspectives. I would then ask each party to communicate their ideal solution or outcome. My goal would be finding common ground where neither is harmed and both gain what's most important to them. While I know this isn't always possible, adequate communication and understanding could get us there. As the mediator, I could facilitate this by providing a balanced perspective and allowing each side to fully voice their ideas without interruption, coming from a place of empathy. With this understanding approach, I believe some mutual understanding could be reached.

student-763

Interview

The most important thing is to understand my cousin's level of maturity. For a very young child, I would keep the explanation simple and clear. But for an older cousin who could grasp a more meaningful discussion, I would have a deeper conversation about the benefits of volunteering. First, I would ask about his current opinions to see his existing knowledge. I would challenge him with questions about how volunteering has helped people he knows, to expand his understanding of its community impact. I could use relevant current events or local examples to illustrate how volunteers create positive change. I would tie this to my cousin's own passions. If he loves animals, I may talk about our local humane society that relies on volunteers to provide services. I would help him identify causes he cares about so he can find fulfilling volunteer opportunities, rather than forcing unrelated experiences. Volunteering is most rewarding when you follow your passions. Additionally, I would share my own volunteering experiences and the profound impact they've had on me. Hopefully through thoughtful discussion tailored to his maturity level, I could open his mind to the personal benefits volunteering can provide, just as it has for me and others I know. My goal is to encourage him by educating in a way he can understand.

student-793

Interview

The main issue here is the spreading of misinformation or disinformation about the potential causes of multiple sclerosis. We know based on extensive scientific evidence that aspartame does not cause MS. However, dispelling claims like this can be difficult when they contain half-truths - information that is true in some contexts but misapplied. For example, it's true neurons can be overexcited by chemicals, potentially causing cell death. But there is no evidence aspartame causes widespread neuron overexcitation or death, which is seen in MS. In fact, we understand MS to be an autoimmune disorder where immune cells attack neurons. When addressing misinformation, it's important not to be aggressive or dismissive, as that often further entrenches false beliefs. A compassionate, open approach is more effective. Ask probing questions to unravel the flawed logic behind the claims. For example, where did you get this information about aspartame? Discuss the reliability of the source. Explain the actual scientific understanding of MS's pathophysiology and aspartame's effects in clear, digestible terms. While aspartame may be a carcinogen, that's unrelated to MS. It's key to dissociate inaccurate connections. Additionally, proactively address questions the person may raise. If you respond to X question in one way, consider how they could respond with Y and prepare a response. Keep the conversation moving forward productively. Validate their concerns and doubts, while clearly communicating what we conclusively know based on current evidence. If knowledge gaps exist, acknowledge we're still working to fully understand MS's causes but can confidently rule out aspartame. Admitting the limits of scientific knowledge shows we take their doubts seriously, even as we dispel falsehoods. The goal is to listen compassionately, build trust, and have an open, evidence-based discussion to counter misinformation. Not all questions have complete answers yet, but we must communicate accurately what is scientifically known and unknown.

student-769

Interview

Before I begin, I just want to thank you for taking the time to listen to why I want to be a doctor. I'm a mature applicant now, and my decision to become a doctor was really something that I wanted to take my time with to make sure it was the right thing for me and explore all my options as a student. I liked the idea of medicine, exploring topics in health and science, but it wasn't until my professional work, education, and volunteer work that I've done as a working professional that really brought me back to medicine and made me realize that it was what I wanted to do with my life. To touch on those experiences as a working professional - right now, I'm a clinical trial monitor with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group at Queen's University. In this role, I have the opportunity to collaborate with research teams across the country on the clinical research that we're doing that is really improving care options available for patients. It's tremendously gratifying to be able to follow a patient's treatment story indirectly as a clinical trial monitor and get to know the best practices that are taking place at each of our clinical research sites. One of the trials that I'm tremendously proud to have worked on was one that improved survival and progression status in breast cancer patients. This was a huge landmark trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine, and has since been adopted as a treatment option for high risk breast cancer patients. I'm tremendously proud to have worked on it and I want to be able to translate experiences like that into a clinical care setting. I want to be able to find ways to improve patient care. One of the things that came to my mind is something that I learned in my part-time course on social determinants of health. I'm also a part-time student - I've taken courses in anatomy and social determinants of health. In the context of my work and existing education, I've really been able to integrate all of these things together into a more comprehensive image of what I think health and wellbeing actually are and ways to address them as a physician. I'm really excited at the prospect of a holistic care model - not only looking at clinical care and interventions, pharmacological and non-pharmacological, but also interventions that address the social determinants of health, like the underlying causes for why people experience the things they do. I think the most important thing, the experience that made me say "this is what I want to do", was working at the COVID-19 vaccination clinics. I think we'll all recall the uncertainty and anxiety people had about COVID-19 and how it was shaping the world. I wanted to get involved managing it as soon as I could, whether with tracking or vaccines. Specifically working in those vaccine clinics as part of that clinical care team was a really gratifying experience. One that I'm tremendously proud to have been involved in something that I'll be able to speak to for the rest of my life. Being told that I'm giving people their lives back by working at these clinics is something that I want to be able to experience every day as a doctor. As soon as I had that opportunity, that was it for me. I knew this is what I want to do. I think the person-to-person interaction is something that I've always loved. The integration of sociological and health factors that I've learned about from my work and school experiences have really brought me to this point where I'm ready to become a doctor, where I know that I want to be a doctor.

student-807

Interview

The issue is that I believe this is not ethical at all. I understand the doctor's perspective - they may feel they have created some sort of relationship. However, as a doctor, this should not be allowed. There is a significant power imbalance between the patient and physician. It's uncertain how much real consent the vulnerable patient can provide. This power imbalance contributes to the unethical nature of the situation. Another reason is that it dismisses proper care - the interaction creates bias that interferes with care. Finally, it violates professional boundaries that doctors must maintain as professionals and in a hospital setting. For these reasons, I do not believe it is ethical at all.

student-722

Interview

In this complex scenario, I would assist these patients by educating and keeping them informed to promote autonomy and engagement in their treatment. The patient-doctor relationship is a two-way street requiring trust and transparency from both sides. When weighing if medication side effects are worthwhile, looking at the harm versus benefit is crucial. If risks outweigh advantages, exploring alternatives may be best. Cost and financial factors are also important considerations. Taking a holistic view and maintaining openness with patients can help find the ideal solution. My role is to provide the full picture regarding treatments so patients can voice preferences and collaborate in decision-making. By prioritizing their well-being and partnership, I aim to support patients in navigating difficult choices to optimize their health outcomes.

student-751

Interview

As the attending physician in this case, I would likely feel very uncomfortable with the profanity and anger directed at me. My first step would be to remove myself from the situation and take a moment to calm down. If possible, I would ask another attending or staff member to temporarily take over care so the patient is not neglected. Hopefully someone more detached can interact in a calmer, unbiased manner. Once I've had a chance to collect myself and be mindful, I would return to speak with the patient privately. I would talk in a calm tone, asking if they would like to voice any concerns and if there is anything I can do to help. I would be understanding that hospitalization can be an extremely stressful time, especially when dealing with significant medical issues. This may be contributing to their struggle with following advice and overall discomfort. My goal would be having an open discussion to understand their perspective, while remaining patient focused.

student-730

Interview

I once had a family funeral happening at the same time as a basketball game where I was team captain. I chose to go to the game instead of attending the funeral with my mom, even though it was for a relative she was close to and she wanted my support. When I got home, I realized this was the wrong decision and felt terrible that my mom went through it alone when I could have been there for her. From that experience, I learned I need to prioritize and sacrifice for what's truly important, even if it's difficult. As a doctor, you sometimes have to sacrifice personal time to provide the best care for patients. Having compassion will help not only as a physician, but in all aspects of life. It builds character, integrity, respect, and love for others. My goal is remembering to put people first, as I should have done by being there for my mom during her time of need.

student-735

Interview

So my understanding of this question is that I'm being asked if it's ethical for a physician to be sexually involved with a patient who initiated or consented to the initial contact. On one hand, I understand that this is a private matter and their personal life shouldn't be scrutinized. However, on the other hand, I think that physicians are in positions of authority, and an intimate relationship can definitely affect patient care. So I think that as a physician, it is their responsibility to really separate their private and personal life from their professional duties. My stance on this would be that if a physician does become sexually involved with a patient, then out of concern for the patient and to maintain quality care, the physician should no longer be their primary caregiver if they want to continue the relationship. However, if they're no longer in a direct patient-physician role and it's no longer a professional relationship, then it could be ethical. As long as the physician is directly caring for the patient, an intimate relationship is not appropriate, because there is an inherent power dynamic that could reduce care quality and be unethical. In medicine, it's not outlandish to imagine situations where physicians need to evaluate how their personal matters and conflicts of interest can negatively impact their provision of quality care. It's really important in these situations for physicians to maintain professionalism, recognize when a personal relationship becomes a conflict of interest, and know when to refrain from actions that could impact their decision-making. Physicians need to be aware of when they should separate their personal and professional lives, or take steps to address any entanglement.

student-713

Interview

If the club covers the full costs for only three people, the other members may perceive preferential treatment, which could negatively impact working relationships within the club. We could split the money so everyone's expenses are partially covered, but some members may still be unable to afford the trip. To try to cover more costs for everyone, I would propose a fundraiser. Whatever money we raise could help offset more of the trip expenses per person. This approach demonstrates fairness by providing support based on participation rather than favoritism. It also fosters teamwork as members work together toward the common goal of making the trip accessible to all.

student-727

Interview

I currently live with my grandparents and use a car provided by my dad for transportation to university - a privilege I really appreciate. However, about a year ago I was in a minor accident with friends late one night after an exam when we went out to celebrate. At first I was hesitant since I prefer early nights, but agreed to bond with them. Telling my family breached their trust, as they disapprove of me being out late. They felt I misused the car they provided for my education. Breaking this news and their disappointment was deeply upsetting. The situation was difficult, but I've persevered and things have improved. Looking back, I should have considered my family's wishes over my friends' social plans. My education is the priority they had in mind for the car, not late nights out. I regret the mistake in judgement, but I continue to work hard in my studies to honor their support. I remain grateful for the opportunity I have been given. The accident reinforced the importance of responsibility in upholding my family's trust.

student-757

Interview

You know, even though I understand that everyone wants to go and that it's a really great opportunity for everyone, I simply do not have the money to let everybody go. And it is my responsibility to make sure that the trip is well planned and that requires money. However, it's also my responsibility to accommodate members of my team. So I think first, the first thing I would do is speak with my two other colleagues, because I think we have to address the situation as a team, since we are a team, and I would ask them first what they would do in this situation and also explain what I would do. And we can just brainstorm and gather ideas together. Then if we don't find any ideas, I would of course tell the other team members that we have a problem, and I would explain to them the problem, because if I were them, I would not like to be left out of the blue. So I would of course tell them what's going on and also take their input into consideration. If we still don't have any ideas and no one suggested any ideas, then I would actually talk to the university and ask them if we could have another payment for our club so that we can all go, and I would explain to them the situation. I can also collaborate with the other clubs and other universities and ask them if they have other fundings and collaborate with them and ask them where they got their money from. If that does not work, I could also find cheaper accommodations. Like if we have to travel, then I'll find cheaper hotels and cheaper transportation ways to go there. If that still doesn't work, then I would have to sacrifice myself. But I don't think I'll be missing out on much because I would join on Zoom. I would ask the others to film everything and to post them and to call me and film everything. So that would be me along with the five other members who can go. We'd make sure to film everything that is essential. If that still does not work, then I would only let three members go. But who would I choose? I would choose those who can do the most and can learn the most. So I would take the most motivated people, actually. And I created Google Forms, where I would ask questions about everybody's motivations, and I would only take the members who have actually shown interest into the club and who have participated a lot since I'd assume they're the ones who are the most invested and who are the most interested. I would also take the people whose answers were well thought and that I saw they passed a lot of time on it. However, I would also make sure that this is only a one time thing, and I would make sure that for the other trips we're organized, that we have enough money. And I think if we're to this point where I didn't have any money left, it means that I didn't organize everything well. So I would have to check on where I went wrong and have to fix the solution or the problem by myself and with my other teammates. And yeah, lastly, I would just follow up and ask if everybody's okay with the solution. And if they aren't, well, I'll take their criticism into consideration and try to accommodate them on my best. So I just follow up with them.

student-800

Interview

Today I'm asked a question - in my clerkship, I coincidentally am placed with my best friend. My best friend is continuing to share stories about their patients, calling them by their name and sharing details about their condition as well as their behavior. I'm asked what ethical issues I can foresee arising from this situation. I think right off the bat, the first thing that came to my mind was patient confidentiality. As a physician, you have a responsibility to keep patient information confidential, especially with the public. Another issue I can foresee happening is creating bias in myself. Because we are in the same clerkship and ward, I can foresee myself caring for some of these same patients. Knowing their name, condition, and behavior from my friend's stories might influence my own perceptions and biases before ever interacting with them myself and being able to form my own opinions with an open perspective. The last issue is jeopardizing trust and the workplace environment. If anyone were to find out, this could jeopardize trust not only between my friend and their patient, but also among colleagues and staff. Conversations can be misconstrued as gossip or rumors which can really affect workplace morale. As we're just starting out, we want to make good impressions and really practice those ethical standards we preach. So I can foresee that causing mistrust. However, I think it's important to communicate with staff and have opportunities to debrief and discuss cases, whether with friends and family. But there are ways to do that while respecting confidentiality. In my experience on a suicide hotline, those conversations were incredibly emotional and taxing. Without being able to discuss those feelings with other volunteers, it would have been very challenging to continue. So I think it's understandable to have these conversations and debrief cases with colleagues, but to do so without giving specific patient names or conditions so it remains confidential. I would encourage my friend to reframe the conversation to how they were feeling or if they wanted general medical advice rather than specifics about the patient. As an aspiring physician, collaboration is important to get perspectives on challenging cases, debrief, and take care of our mental health. Diverse perspectives can help patient care too. Perhaps my friend was misreading a situation and I could give a better outlook for them to go back with empathy and provide better care. So collaboration is essential but confidential.

student-808

Interview

If I haven't seen any problems right away, my instant reaction would be to take a second to reflect on why they feel this way. Are there any specific examples? Have I had these types of complaints before? If not, what potential situations in the past several days treating this patient could have created these issues? Were there times I was tired or had a lapse in judgment with my speech? I would really want to figure out what situations here could have led them to feeling this way, because I would strive for the best bedside manner and relationship with the patient and their family. After reflecting, I would want to talk to my supervisor to find out the specific complaints - where is my bedside manner lacking? What conversations or aspects were not good and where can I improve? I'd want to know if the supervisor thinks it's appropriate for me to potentially have an open conversation with the patient and family to improve the situation. At the end of the day, if they really feel I am not the right fit and there's nothing I can do, then it's about the patient's health and well-being. If they can't be persuaded to allow me to make changes, it may be best for me to step off the case because the patient's health comes first. However, hopefully they'd be willing to have a conversation with me about this. I'd love to not only improve the situation, but also improve myself for the future. I'd love to have a one-on-one conversation to listen to their complaints, figure out which aspects of my bedside manner need changing, and work collaboratively to make a plan for improvements going forward. I am confident in my abilities and would hope to give the best treatment. I would welcome the opportunity for feedback so I can be mindful of the changes they want and take it into consideration. If in the future it's just not a personality match after trying my best to make changes, I would have to move on and take it as a learning experience. I could have a conversation with my supervisor about whether these are ongoing issues for me, where I can improve, and if it was just a one-off personality clash. It's a good skill to be able to adapt, but if after trying to improve I'm still not able, I'll have to move on and continue improving for the future.

student-822

Interview

As a physician, my main concerns are the patient's health and respecting their wishes. However, at 16 they are a minor, so I would also need to consider the parents' wishes if they are the legal guardians. I would want to have private conversations with the patient and parents separately to better understand the patient's desire for the procedure and gauge their knowledge so I can provide information and answer questions. Similarly, I would seek to comprehend the parents' opposition in a non-judgmental way by allowing them to voice concerns and addressing any questions so they may feel more comfortable. After these discussions, I would encourage the parents and child to speak together to understand both perspectives. My role is to serve as an impartial third party source of procedural information, not advocating for either side since my duty is to both the patient and the legal guardians. By facilitating open dialogue for all parties to voice their reasoning, I aim to find the best resolution that balances the patient's well-being, autonomy, and the parents' right to decide what is medically appropriate for their minor child.

student-749

Interview

This is an incredibly difficult situation and likely the worst thing a physician could experience - seeing your patient die after discharge. The family's question about why you discharged the patient is completely valid. First, I would avoid becoming defensive. I would review the case notes, surgery recording if available, and consult other physicians involved in the patient's care to see if any mistakes or oversights occurred. I would do this quickly to get answers for the family. I would arrange a meeting with the family soon after to express my deepest condolences and give them space to share their concerns and frustrations. I would explain my rationale for discharging the patient based on her status at the time. If my review found no issues with her care, I would communicate we discharged her without expecting this outcome. I would do everything possible to understand what happened and be open to an autopsy with their consent. Most importantly, I would not absolve myself of potential blame. I would offer transparent theories about what could have occurred and potential solutions or ways to rectify the situation, even if unlikely to fully assuage their concerns. I would aim to be as open and honest as possible about what went wrong if anything did, or explain our reasoning if not. I would discuss what could have been done differently in hindsight and validate their concerns. There are many potential approaches, but the priorities are avoiding defensiveness, answering all questions, looking for more answers, and being transparent. This is devastating for the family, and no explanation will be fully satisfying. But I would work to help them get the answers they need while expressing empathy for their loss. Admitting fault if applicable and working to prevent recurrence is critical after an outcome like this.

student-770

Interview

This is a difficult situation, as the athlete plans to use prohibited anabolic steroids to train for competition. However, my role as this family's physician is to provide the best care regardless of circumstances. I would first have a private conversation asking what he knows about steroid use - both medically and in terms of athletic consequences. It's important to ensure he fully comprehends the potential long-term health risks that could hinder his quality of life. This conversation can create an open environment for him to ask questions and voice concerns, which I would try to answer or consult a specialist if needed. By establishing this relationship and addressing his questions, I aim to create a space where he knows I want to help. As his longtime physician with knowledge of his history, I would share that I'm willing to continue treating him. If he proceeds with steroids, I would monitor his health impacts - though ethically complex, it's key as a physician to approach with an open mind to provide the best care. While steroid use may be prohibited and concerning, my priority is this patient's well-being. By having an open dialogue, I can ensure he makes an informed choice and feels comfortable coming to me for care, even if I cannot condone his actions.

student-767

Interview

First, I would have an open conversation with my friend Brian to understand how he feels about the situation. I would express empathy and sympathize with his disappointment. However, I would reassure him that not being selected for the Olympic Team likely relates to the committee's criteria, not his abilities as an athlete. This should not negatively impact Brian's self-image or aspirations. The Paralympic Games are coming up in two weeks - he needs to stay focused on preparing and feeling motivated to perform at his best. We can't let this detract from his upcoming competition. My role as Brian's friend is to listen supportively, then instill excitement and a positive attitude about the Paralympic opportunity ahead. He is still an elite athlete with a major games ready to commence. My message will be one of empathy but emphasizing perseverance and the future possibilities.

student-784

Interview

I believe this is a complicated issue with many perspectives on universal basic income. There are pros and cons, but I am more in favor of it as I believe people should be able to provide for themselves and their families. As a physician, this career is about advocating for others, and the ultimate form of advocacy is ensuring people can provide for and advocate for themselves. A basic income is essential for people to be able to do that.

student-815

Interview

In this complex situation, I would make remaining unbiased and not pre-judging a priority before taking action. I would have one-on-one conversations with my mother and father separately to better understand their perspectives. Using those insights, I would then speak to my sister and brother-in-law to hear their thoughts and stance, since ultimately it is their family and decision. I would offer support, whether financially, emotionally, or by guiding them through the process. My role is to assist my sister and brother-in-law with whatever they decide in the end, after thoroughly listening to all sides without judgment. By seeking to comprehend each perspective, I can provide the most meaningful support to my sister during this challenging situation, while still respecting her autonomy in choosing the path forward.

student-744

Interview

The issue of legalizing marijuana in the Canadian healthcare system is complex, with several perspectives to consider. Some potential pros include providing a regulated source to offset potentially contaminated black market marijuana, and easier access for patients who use it medicinally, like cancer patients for nausea relief. Cons could be increased accessibility leading to misuse if public education on safe use and effects is lacking. Dangers like impaired driving are a concern if marijuana use is not informed and responsible. A regulated government source can ensure safety standards and avoid spread of illness from contaminated sources. At the same time, wider access must be accompanied by public education campaigns on potential side effects and safe, responsible use. Strict impaired driving laws should be upheld. If use is informed, overall costs to the healthcare system may be reduced compared to problems caused by dangerous substances like opioids. But appropriate regulation and education are key to maximize public health benefits and minimize harm. There are reasonable arguments on both sides, so thorough assessment of public health impacts is needed if considering legalization.

student-774

Interview

In this scenario, my best friend tells me that he is a compulsive gambler and he asks for my money after discussing the broad implications of gambling on society. The first thing that I would do is gather as much information as possible. I will try to ask about his personal circumstances. They mentioned they don't have any money to buy even food - can they elaborate on that? What do they mean by no money? Are they in the negatives or barely getting by? In addition, are they in any form of danger? As of now, they mentioned needing to pay back loan sharks. Are they currently pressuring my friend or potentially threatening them? Third, if they don't have money now, how are they affording housing? If renting or paying a mortgage, how will they pay next month? Lastly, I have to provide empathy, listen non-judgmentally. Gambling addiction is like any addiction - it's very hard to quit, not just a matter of willpower but brain connections. So I want to support my friend without judgment. With that in mind, it's important to think about my friend's family. Have they reached out to family for money? Do they know about the gambling? How is their relationship after finding out? I want to consider their wellbeing and how I can support them too. Lastly, what kind of societal help has my friend sought out? For example, if they can't afford housing, have they reached out for housing aid, addiction counseling, financial aid? What societal help have they received or reached out for? So after gathering information, it's important to decide on my actions. I want to help my friend but not feed the gambling behavior. I will ask them to elaborate on using the money to "win it all back" - does that mean more gambling? I will let them know I'm happy to help pay back the loan sharks so they aren't in danger, but won't support gambling as a way out. So if they agree to pay back loans only, I will give the money. Then I'll try to connect them to addiction resources, financial aid, housing aid, etc. to guide them away from gambling and towards sustainability. That concludes my answer. Please let me know if you have any follow up questions. Thank you.

student-809

Interview

A few years ago, my extended family took a trip to my uncle's secluded lake cottage in Torber Morris, Ontario. We hadn't seen each other in a while, so it was a nice chance to reconnect. There were three families staying in the fairly spacious but isolated cottage. One night, the parents realized we were low on groceries and decided to go buy snacks so we could watch a movie later. Everyone left and I was alone in the pitch dark cottage. I tried to stay calm but was definitely afraid being there by myself. The nearest neighbor was kilometers away, so I had no way to walk anywhere at night. After about an hour, I suddenly saw a light through the living room window and heard footsteps. My heart started pounding and I couldn't breathe. I didn't know who could be out there and what might happen. I jumped up from the couch and cautiously looked out the window. To my enormous relief, it was just the parents returning! This was a terrifying moment, amplified by the remote setting. Being alone in the cottage far from anyone else made every sound seem threatening. While very scary in the moment, it ended up being nothing. But it gave me a lasting appreciation for how isolation can heighten fear and make the imagination run wild.

student-780

Interview

Recognizing such a complex scenario, my priority would be to uphold the integrity and principles of being a practicing medical practitioner while also emphasizing the importance of well-being for myself, my elderly patients and society as a whole. In this situation, I would give myself the vaccine because ensuring my health and safety during the outbreak would allow me to continue working to provide healthcare services to other elderly patients. Not only would I be benefiting myself, but I would be benefiting these patients of mine as well. Assisting these patients is a large responsibility of mine, and I am obliged to fulfill that responsibility. Giving the vaccine to a different person might not be the best option. I would give it to myself.

student-758

Interview

The main reason I really want to become a physiotherapist started when I was young. I played a lot of sports and have always been interested in science. Playing sports, I've had the misfortune of many injuries. Starting around age 12, I've had to go to physio multiple times. I've been to many clinics as I got older, playing lacrosse at a high level and football. I've seen different physios because the teams have different affiliations. So I've had a lot of great experiences with physiotherapists. With my interest in science and studying anatomy and research in high school and university, I've reflected on my experiences and found physiotherapy combines my interests. It allows me to work one-on-one with people at the intersection of anatomy, physiology, physical activity, health, wellness, movement, sports, injury recovery, and improving daily living. You incorporate knowledge, research, and new developments in collaboration with doctors, occupational therapists, and other physiotherapists to create the best plan for each patient. This really interests me. My exposure to different physios provided great role models who inspired me to continue my journey as an athlete and scholar. When I was able to reevaluate what I value, those influences focused me on becoming a physiotherapist. Additionally, my experience coaching and working with kids with autism has shown I work well and communicate effectively one-on-one. I enjoy the process of helping someone improve their abilities and quality of life through movement in a one-on-one setting. I want to put people in a position to succeed. Coaching has allowed me to create positive environments and build relationships with each player to ensure they can improve, have fun, make friends, and gain lifelong healthy skills. These experiences have reinforced and further influenced my desire to be a physiotherapist, as I want to provide this on a daily basis. I think it plays to my strengths.

student-823

Interview

I agree this problematic behavior cannot be justified despite Dr. A's strong surgical outcomes. Fostering disrespect erodes team cohesion, which harms care quality. If staff feel constantly disrespected, they will be less motivated, compromising patient outcomes. Allowing this culture risks trainees emulating such conduct, propagating disrespectful patterns. Treating patients dismissively dehumanizes them, infringing on their rights and dignity. Research shows dehumanization impairs care. Though Dr. A's individual metrics are strong, condoning this behavior will enable greater harm long-term. A disrespectful environment will breed future disrespectful practitioners, eventually degrading care for countless patients. While short-term surgical results matter, the downstream effects of normalized mistreatment pose too great a risk. Upholding patient dignity and nurturing collaborative team cultures must remain paramount. Overall, Dr. A's pattern of disrespect cannot be justified solely by immediate outcomes, as it threatens patient wellbeing and staff integrity in the long run.

student-828

Interview

This scenario, where Dr. Cheung is recommending homeopathic medicines to his patients despite the lack of scientific evidence and him not fully believing it either, calls up a number of fascinating ethical dilemmas. Initially, I thought that the doctor’s behavior was considered ethically wrong since he himself didn’t believe in homeopathic medicine due to the scant evidence, yet was recommending it to patients. However, if he communicated clearly about the lack of scientific evidence and how he does not believe in it to the patients, and the patients are aware of it, then it is not ethically wrong. Ultimately, the patients have the rights to be aware of the treatment plans, including the benefits and risks involved, before making informed decisions. So, if the patients are still willing to consent to the homeopathic approach, despite him explaining the risks involved, then going in accordance with respecting patients’ autonomy, this would not be an ethical issue. On the contrary, it becomes an ethical issue when the doctor withholds detailed explanations and information about the approach from his patients. Doing so, he violates patients’ autonomy and isn’t acting in their best interests. Using the psychological effect of placebo to create a false sense of reassurance is considered deceiving and misleading. This jeopardizes patients' trust for this doctor or even the entire medical system since patients may find out that the prescribed drug has no effect in improving their conditions. Hence, by failing to inform clearly about the treatment, he is preventing his patients from making an informed decision about their healthcare. However, this situation leaves out some details that are important before arriving at a final conclusion: [1] Is he doing business with or promoting homeopathic medicines because his name is on the meds? [2] Does he have a financial stake in these drugs? [3] Is he qualified to practice complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to offer this treatment to patients? [4] Did he explore other alternatives within conventional medicine before recommending this approach? If he is doing business or has a commercial interest, it might be unethical for him to be recommending such treatment given that his clinical judgement could be clouded based on his business interest, suggesting a conflict of interest. Moreover, there is a likelihood that patients are easily persuaded as to the “reassurance” of the treatment through trust of an SMC-registered doctor. Hence, it is crucial to keep in mind the patient's autonomy and right to all information of potentially available treatments. In conclusion, it would be unethical for him to be recommending an approach that lacks scientific evidence. It is also equally unethical for him to create a false sense of reassurance for his patients just because he believes that homeopathic medicines do no harm. I would recommend that he stays transparent and be honest with his patients by openly discussing the lack of evidence and explaining the potential implications. Doing so, he maintains the trust and respect of his patients which will not result in misleading “reassurance”.

student-801

Interview

In this complex situation, I would aim to uphold academic integrity while remaining mindful of my friend's perspective. Since the semester has ended and grades finalized, I would have a private conversation to educate them on why their behavior was problematic and posed an unfair advantage. If they recognize the issue, I would hope we could approach the professor to disclose the misconduct and face the consequences, hopefully preventing future occurrences. I would also consult other friends to gain additional perspectives on addressing this ethically. My priorities are being transparent regarding the inappropriate actions while also guiding my friend with compassion to take responsibility. This maintains academic honesty while supporting their moral development. Through open dialogue and accountability, we can transform this lapse in judgement into a learning experience for growth.

student-745

Interview

This is a difficult situation that requires considering multiple perspectives - that of the physician dating their patient, the patient themselves, and my own role and duty in this situation. As the patient's physician, they likely see them as a trustworthy source of care. However, physician-patient relationships have an inherent power imbalance, as physicians hold greater medical knowledge, which can unduly influence patients' decisions. This could lead to the physician not prioritizing evidence-based care with this particular patient. As this represents a conflict of interest, it raises ethical concerns regarding patient care at the clinic. Having recognized this issue, I have a duty to address it professionally and calmly, not making any rash judgments. I should initiate a discussion with the physician to outline my observations non-accusatorily. Framing this as a legal and risk mitigation issue may make it easier to convey. Emphasizing our shared commitment to patients' wellbeing is paramount. An alternative could be transferring the patient's care to me, allowing continuity while eliminating the conflict of interest. With trust between us, they may agree this is best. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-827

Interview

This complex scenario requires a sensitive and compassionate approach. I would disclose the information to both the mother and father together in a private, comfortable setting while being fully transparent, as this is something they deserve to know. However, I would deliver the distressing news with great caution and care given the serious implications for the family. I also believe the biological father should be informed so that future pregnancies are aware of potential risks. Disclosing misleading paternity results inevitably has consequences. My role is to navigate this difficult revelation empathetically and honestly. By choosing the appropriate time and manner to inform all parties, I aim to provide clarity while attempting to minimize the disruption and anguish such news may cause this family. Though painful, they deserve to know the truth.

student-752

Interview

One time I disappointed my parents was during my brief stint on a higher-level soccer team. I had played soccer my whole life in Northern Ontario, where competition was limited. One year, I was good enough to make a team with kids a year older than me, around ages 12-13. This team traveled most weekends to play tournaments in Southern Ontario, about a 5 hour drive each way. Being a year younger at that developmental age meant I was less physically mature and lacked confidence compared to my older teammates. As a result, I hardly got any playing time during the tournaments. At first my parents reassured me, proud I even made the team. But I could see it wear on them that they were spending entire weekends traveling just to watch me sit on the bench. To ease their disappointment, I reevaluated my relationship with the sport. I loved soccer and the chance to compete, but wanted to enjoy playing more, and have my parents enjoy watching me play. So the next year, I dropped back down to my age group. I became captain, played entire games, and had much more fun. While it was good to get that higher-level experience, considering how I felt and accounting for my parents' experience led me to make a change. Consolidating onto an age-appropriate team ended up being better for me and my family. I was able to have a more fulfilling soccer career moving forward.

student-764

Interview

This is an important issue involving someone close to me, so I need to address it without bias but make clear the seriousness of her actions. I would ask to speak with her privately at a time when she's not exhausted or overwhelmed. Bringing donuts or something to show care, I'd gently ask how much she had to drink to understand what led to this. If heavy drinking is new or unusual for her, I'd want to know more about what caused that. Most importantly, I would advise her to seek out information on the person she hit - visit the intersection for cameras, check local medical centers. She needs to take responsibility for apologizing, compensating the victim's family, and correcting her mistake as much as possible. Drunk driving resulting in an accident is unacceptable. For the future, I would offer to be with her when drinking to ensure she doesn't drive impaired. I'd discuss alternatives like Uber, public transit, calling me or someone else for a ride. She can always contact me rather than drive drunk. If charges are pressed, I would encourage her to admit guilt and accept the consequences. Actively righting the wrong through apology and restitution may minimize penalties. But accountability is essential. My goal is helping her understand the gravity of her actions, take responsibility, and prevent any recurrence, while also providing support as her friend.

student-782

Interview

First, I would greet Jason, thank him for having me over, and have an open conversation. I want to listen without judgment to understand why he hasn't been attending class and how I can help him return. There could be many underlying reasons I'm unaware of. If he's going through a difficult time, I'll offer support to help get him back on track for classes and medical school applications. If it's a lack of motivation or feeling discouraged by the difficulty, I can relate - medical school is challenging. In that case, we'd discuss his goals and ways I can assist, like studying together or working on applications. The aim is hearing his perspective, offering support tailored to his needs, and outlining how we can move forward productively. By having an empathetic discussion oriented around helping him achieve his dreams, I hope to get him back on the path towards success.

student-737

Interview

In this situation with my sister, I would communicate the factors of risk and reliability to consider. There are some red flags around the health of the person receiving the embryo implantation and their capacity to sustain a pregnancy. We'd need to assess if they are being properly cared for and could provide a healthy environment for fetal development. This reminds me of an experience I had when looking to buy a cheap used car on Kijiji during a financially difficult time. At first glance, the low price seemed perfect. But when I mapped the seller's address, it was a sketchy, secluded barn rather than a house. Despite the initial appeal, observational evidence revealed too many risks and unreliability factors. So I decided not to go through with it. Similarly here, we need to carefully evaluate the safety and wellbeing of the person carrying the pregnancy before agreeing to this in vitro fertilization. Can we be fully confident this person is healthy enough to support a baby and provide proper care through gestation? The goal should be minimizing risks and maximizing the reliability of a healthy fetal environment. Just like I avoided the questionable used car purchase, proceeding requires fully addressing these concerns first.

student-781

Interview

To start off, I would immediately acknowledge the owner's and customer's complaint over the subpar quality of the food. The rationale behind my first action is to hold myself and our team accountable. After acknowledging and addressing the problem, I would speak with the two employees about our performance and how we could improve our cooking techniques. I feel that reprimanding the two underage employees is unnecessary due to the potential impact on morale and their trust in me as a manager. Additionally, I would need to gather information from my team as to why they could not cook the meals properly - was it due to how busy they were, are we currently understaffed during a lunch rush, or did I not train them properly on how to cook a burger? To conclude, I would first apologize to our franchisee on our subpar quality for the last 30 minutes. Then I would inform and retrain my staff or make adjustments to better accommodate our workload.

student-717

Interview

Right, so first off, I don't think it's wise to simply introduce a lower speed limit in a city just because another city did so. Each city is really specific and has its own unique population. In order to determine if a lower speed limit should be introduced in Edmonton, it's important to look not only at the specific routes, but also the demographics of the local population. I think we first need to look at Edmonton's routes to see if there are roads that pose heightened dangers to drivers, similar to what may have prompted the lower speed limit in Plymouth. It's key to understand why traffic incidents are happening in the first place. After analyzing the road conditions and safety issues, I would also examine the population. It could be relevant to see if Edmonton has a large population of young or elderly drivers who may struggle with driving at higher speeds. Other population factors like rates of impaired driving could also influence accident rates. Additionally, it would be prudent to assess road construction patterns and detour frequency. If Edmonton's roads face a lot of closures and rerouting, reducing speed limits could help prevent accidents. In summary, Plymouth's decision to reduce speed limits doesn't necessarily mean Edmonton should follow suit. Each city requires an independent analysis based on road conditions, population demographics, impaired driving rates, construction patterns, and other locality-specific factors. However, Plymouth's experience can provide a model to consider. If a detailed study determines Edmonton faces similar challenges that prompted Plymouth's speed limit decrease, a lower limit could be reasonable for our city as well - perhaps only on the most high-risk roads. The decision should ultimately be based on Edmonton's own traffic patterns, risks, and needs.

student-790

Interview

I think there are several potential ethical issues in this scenario that should be addressed. The first step would be to speak privately with the attending physician, in a respectful manner, after the exam. I would start by asking if the patient consented to having students present for the intimate exam. Even if consent was obtained, I felt the patient looked uncomfortable when asked to lift her shirt with us in the room. Sensitive exams require direct consent from the patient, which wasn't clearly obtained here. I would explain my perspective - that getting the patient's explicit consent and ensuring her comfort should be the priority. However, I would listen openly if the attending has a different viewpoint, given their greater experience. If we cannot agree, I may need to raise the issue to a supervisor, as a last resort. As a student, I have limited power in this situation. If I felt very uncomfortable with the lack of consent and wished to leave but was refused, that would compound the ethical issues. My goal would be to have an open discussion and come to an understanding, so the patient's preferences regarding consent and privacy are respected in the future. This protects her dignity while also upholding ethical standards in medicine.

student-772

Interview

This is a difficult situation, so we need to consider both perspectives - that of the doctor and the government health insurance program. I believe it is unethical for doctors to recommend circumcisions without clearly informing patients of the risks and downsides, since this is not a medically necessary procedure. Doctors should provide patients with full information about the risks and cons so they can make a fully informed, autonomous decision. On the other hand, the government insurance program (OHIP) is no longer covering circumcisions, which fails to take into account people who need the surgery for religious reasons. The government should be more aware of religious beliefs requiring circumcision. A better approach could be to target coverage for those who need it for religious reasons, while also informing the general public that routine circumcision is unnecessary and carries some risks. This way we maintain patient autonomy but provide access when warranted by religious belief. The key is fully informing all patients and balancing access with education on risks and benefits. This allows patients to make autonomous choices while targeting coverage to those with religious need.

student-720

Interview

Health inequalities refer to unequal access to healthcare services, education, and resources. In Canada, examples include lack of access to healthier foods for lower socioeconomic groups, reduced medical services in rural areas compared to urban centers, and insufficient culturally competent care for our diverse population. Addressing these requires engaging key stakeholders and utilizing both downstream and upstream solutions. For rural communities, downstream approaches could include community programs to empower healthy lifestyles through proper sleep, mental health support, social connection, physical activity, and self-care. Allocating more funding to develop rural healthcare facilities and services, in consultation with local providers and residents about specific needs, is critical. Upstream policy solutions should involve rural stakeholders in developing policies tailored to rural health, rather than the current focus on urban settings. For cultural competence, actively fostering diversity among healthcare practitioners is essential so they can understand and address the values and beliefs of diverse patients with sensitivity. Overall, resolving health inequalities requires multifaceted strategies engaging affected groups, addressing root causes, and expanding access through both systemic and local solutions. With collaboration, we can work to ensure all Canadians, regardless of socioeconomic status, geography, or background, have the opportunity to achieve their best health. Please let me know if you would like me to expand on any part of this response.

student-829

Interview

I believe physician-assisted suicide can be ethically appropriate if certain conditions are met. The patient's medical condition must be deteriorating with no viable treatment options left. They should be fully informed of all alternatives, including hospice and palliative care focused on pain and symptom management. If after being provided information on and careful consideration of these options, the patient still believes physician-assisted suicide aligns with their values and preferences, their autonomy should be respected. However, it is imperative that the physician ensures the patient has full decision-making capacity and is making an informed, voluntary choice. With appropriate safeguards in place to confirm it is the patient's wish and that all alternatives have been explored, physician-assisted suicide could be conducted ethically in specific end-of-life care scenarios. The key is prioritizing patient autonomy based on fully informed consent.

student-775

Interview

In such a scenario, my priority would be to ensure transparency and come to a collective agreement through careful deliberation with the other judges. Both presentations have very similar, on-par content, making it difficult to choose a sole winner. However, there are other factors the judges and I could consider. One is the delivery and enthusiasm or professionalism of the presenter. Another is the recency and relevance of the proposed solutions to the specific health issue and location of our event. For example, the presentation on access to primary care addresses a pressing issue in our current location. We could also consider the practicality and feasibility of the solutions - something with more profound real-world implications might meet our criteria. By discussing these factors, the other judges and I could thoughtfully decide on a winner through open deliberation.

student-760

Interview

In our province, I think our healthcare system overall does a pretty good job. With a public healthcare system like we have in Canada, where people are able to get hopefully accessible and inclusive care, there's definitely going to be shortcomings. But overall we see a system where we have our so-called "free healthcare," although we do pay taxes. In any system there's always going to be strengths and weaknesses. But I think overall we do a pretty good job. The issue I'm most passionate about would be accessibility and equality issues, specifically the treatment of indigenous people and people with disabilities. I don't want to make broad, sweeping statements about healthcare in general because it's not every single doctor or health authority that has these issues. But I think with indigenous people in our province and Canada, there have been many instances where they haven't been treated properly and haven't been given the same resources and opportunities to be successful. Some doctors are great, but there have been high profile and likely many unreported cases where indigenous people have not been given the same treatment - whether refused treatments, turned away due to prejudices, or not welcomed in a Western medical environment because as healthcare providers, we're unable or unwilling to accommodate certain values and beliefs. I think this is super important and something we can improve on. Where many indigenous people live in rural communities in BC, I think as a province we struggle to provide good, meaningful, equitable healthcare to people in rural and indigenous communities. It's something they really deserve and I'm quite passionate about. I think it's important that as we move forward, we educate current and future generations with knowledge on how to deal with these issues so professionals are better equipped to go in without prejudice and find solutions that work for both patient and doctor to have a good working relationship that maximizes health outcomes. All cultures and beliefs should be welcome in a healthcare setting by having empathetic people able to go in with no judgment or prejudice, and allow different views and practices that maximize patient outcomes. Having someone willing to listen and create meaningful, non-judgmental relationships with indigenous people in healthcare is key. I also mentioned people with disabilities. As Westerners and able-bodied people, there are barriers we don't think of that prevent access. Addressing those barriers is really important and something I'm passionate about because I firmly believe everyone should be given the opportunity to access our good healthcare system.

student-821

Interview

All right, so the question is, if I was on the admissions committee, what would be the most important thing I would look for in a candidate? I think the most important attribute to become a doctor is actually empathy. So I will really want to look for an empathic person because if people are not empathetic and they become doctors, then patients can be really upset, they can be angry towards the physician and the physician just won't understand what's going on. Also, if they don't deliver news in an empathic manner or if they don't feel for the patient, then I think it can really damage the trust relationship that the patient has with the physician and overall just damage the patient's treatment. I also think that a doctor's job is to do the most good and the least harm. And if they're not empathetic, then I think it would eventually just hurt the patient more than do good because they won't feel respected, they won't feel like their feelings matter, they won't feel like their feelings are taken into consideration and they'll just feel like an object to the physician. So I think that's really important. I would also look for candidates who have good communication skills because I think it's important for a doctor to be able to communicate clearly and also simply what the diagnosis is so that the patient understands exactly what he will be going through. So yes, I think those are two very important factors. Also, I think one of the most important things is to be motivated to become a doctor. Because I think that if future physicians don't want to go into medicine and they're only forced to by their parents or they feel social pressure, then I think it can actually be really harmful to the patients and society in general, because physicians, like I said before, have to be empathetic, have to have good communication. But they also need to want to do this because this is a very stressful, I think, job, and it requires a lot of dedication and a lot of university time. And I think that if you're not motivated enough, it will actually make you become a more frustrated person. And no patient likes a frustrated doctor because it's easy for a patient to know when the doctor is actually annoyed with you or disrespects you or does not value you. So I think if you don't want to go into medicine, then it's probably the worst career path you could take if you're not sure of what you want to do because there are so many important things to look for before being a doctor. That's pretty much it. But I would also never neglect anyone in the admissions process because I think that everyone has their own skill set to show and to put forward. And even though I said what I thought were the most important attributes, I would also consider many others. And I would also let the interviewees surprise me. And if I find something that I find particularly interesting or a characteristic trait of a person that I think would make a good doctor, then I would not hesitate to take that person into the university.

student-799

Interview

As a physician determining if medication side effects are worthwhile, I would first consult the patient about their priorities. I would compare the severity of their disease and its impact on their quality of life to how potential side effects could affect their daily living. For example, I would ask if side effects like nausea, weight gain, or depressive symptoms would be acceptable trade-offs for treating their condition. The patient's preferences and values are most important, so I would have an open discussion about whether mitigating their illness or avoiding side effects is more vital for their wellbeing. By eliciting the patient's goals and weighing the risks versus benefits together, we can make the best personalized medical decision. My aim is understanding what matters most to the individual when evaluating treatment options and potential consequences.

student-732

Interview

In this airplane scenario, my first approach would be to politely communicate with the parent and see if they could possibly switch seats with their screaming baby. If that doesn't work, I would offer to change my own seat as an alternative solution. This reminds me of a time during clinical experience when an elderly male patient was giving the receptionists a hard time about long wait times. Since the providers were very busy, I stepped out of my comfort zone as a volunteer with no patient experience and approached the man myself to try and calm the situation. I engaged him in civil conversation, acknowledged his frustration, and asked some questions about his concerns. Though initially still upset, he soon relaxed and we were able to connect on a human level. By the time providers were available, he had completely calmed down and thanked me as he left. Similarly here, though screaming babies can be grating, I would empathize with the stressed parent. If the noise became too much, I would politely communicate and try to find a mutually agreeable solution, whether that's them moving or me switching seats. The priority is addressing the issue compassionately through open communication and perspective taking.

student-787

Interview

This question brings up issues of justice and helping those in need. While there is an equity problem among coworkers when some have items taken, I believe the priority should be assisting the person struggling. I would start by calling a group meeting to remind everyone about available resources like insurance plans, breakfast served daily, and supplies like toothpaste. I would ask coworkers for suggestions on improving quality of life in the office and incorporate their ideas. I would also collaborate with colleagues to try and discern who is taking the items, which I assume are not extremely valuable. This indicates someone likely facing financial hardship. I would tell the group that anyone struggling should feel free to speak with me privately so I can offer more support. While noting that stealing is unethical, I would not shame but rather aim to understand their situation. For instance, if it seems to be a diligent employee, I would consider them for a promotion based on merit, not the stealing. I would encourage open communication and convey my desire to help. If it appears to be an outsider stealing, I would add security measures. My goal would be providing financial assistance through office programs to alleviate the need for theft. I would follow up to ensure the person is doing better and offer additional help as needed. The focus should be having an empathetic, private conversation to get to the root of the issue and assist the individual.

student-777

Interview

If I notice bruises on a 10-year-old patient, I must first understand the cause before jumping to conclusions, just as I would want if I were the parent. I would analyze the bruises, and if I suspect abuse, have a private conversation with the boy to protect his autonomy and privacy. If he shares more about the situation, my priority is supporting him - empathizing, comforting him in my office. I would discuss available resources, though reporting to parents could endanger him further. Since he is only 10, I would ensure he has a support system like another family member he can talk to regularly and somewhere safe to go. His well-being is most important. I cannot leave it at that, as returning home may lead to further harm. So I would try to have a conversation with the parents, not to blame or confront them, but to understand their personalities and what is behind their actions. If issues like addiction, temper, or lack of resources are factors, I can offer help - improving the child's life also means improving the whole family's. I would share my concerns without implicating the child, framing it as my own observations so the boy is not punished. Providing my contact information, I would follow up to monitor the situation closely. My goal is to address this sensitively while prioritizing the child's safety and well-being.

student-795

Interview

Hi Jason, it's good to see you today. I'm glad we could meet up. I was wondering how you've been the last few days since I haven't heard from you - I was concerned. How are the medical school applications going? Is everything okay generally? Have you been eating and sleeping alright? It was surprising when you didn't come to class since you're usually so diligent. I'm sure there's a logical reason, but as your friend I want to make sure you're doing well. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help or if you need someone to talk to. I'm here for you and just want to make sure you're taking care of yourself. Let me know if you need anything at all.

student-755

Interview

This is a difficult situation because as a physician, I always want to ensure that the patient, whoever they're associated with, is experiencing and having competent care, but also that they feel comfortable with the care that they are given. For them to feel uncomfortable is an injustice. As a physician, I would first in this situation, if they're talking to the supervisor, ask the supervisor if they would be comfortable enough meeting with me again. If they are, I would say that as a physician, my primary responsibility is towards the patient. I will do whatever I can in my power to ensure that your patient care experience is as comfortable as possible. I would ask if they're willing to meet with me in order to discuss how we can improve this relationship and what I can do to ensure that the patient is not only fully autonomous but is receiving competent and comfortable care. If they are comfortable enough meeting with me, then I would meet with the patient and their family. I would say to the family that I will do whatever I can in my power to ensure that you receive competent and comfortable care. I would address any concerns that they may have. I would ask if they were willing to continue with me as a physician, and if they believed that even though I address these issues, if they believed that they would have a more comfortable care experience with someone else, I would put them in contact with another physician, or I would ask my supervisor to put them in contact with another physician. Although in a perfect world, if I was being completely objective and there weren't any issues with the care, then I would want to continue with them being their physician. But if they believe they'd be more comfortable with someone else, the primary responsibility as a healthcare provider is that you give your patients the most comfortable experience that they can have. I would ensure that they are with a physician which can provide them with the care and comfort that they require.

student-819

Interview

Three key qualities that exemplify my personable nature are communication skills, patient advocacy, and ability to collaborate. Peers in school, work, and my personal life would describe me as personable - someone who connects well with others. This involves qualities like effectively communicating, standing up for patients, and finding common ground. I demonstrated these traits early on in my clinical experience volunteering at a family medical clinic. One day an elderly male patient was giving the receptionists a hard time and the other introverted volunteers looked to me to intervene. Despite having no experience, I approached the man and acknowledged his frustration. I engaged him in conversation, asked about his grandchildren, and found commonalities to establish a connection. Though initially angry, he soon relaxed and we had a meaningful interaction. This exemplified using communication, advocacy, and collaboration to resolve a tense situation. The ability to build rapport is so valuable for a healthcare provider. As a prospective physician assistant, I want to bring my personable nature to relate to patients, make them feel heard, and build trust. My interpersonal skills allow me to connect with diverse people, understand their needs, and forge lasting relationships. These qualities represent my strengths.

student-788

Interview

In this complex scenario, I would aim to balance public safety and the autonomy of elderly drivers. As someone living with grandparents, I understand the importance of independent transportation for convenience and self-reliance. However, certain health conditions associated with aging may pose risks. Rather than broad bans, I believe driving ability should be assessed case-by-case, perhaps with annual check-ins. This upholds seniors' freedom while addressing concerns. Driving represents vital independence for many older adults. At the same time, declining visual, cognitive or physical health could endanger others if not evaluated properly. Individualized assessments seem the fairest compromise between maintaining autonomy and ensuring road safety. With a thoughtful system of evaluation, we can preserve mobility and dignity for seniors while protecting the broader public.

student-753

Interview

In this complex situation, I would balance respecting the individual's autonomy and recognizing their maturity while adhering to the research team's legal and ethical practices. If the team or local law requires adult consent from someone 18 or older, I would need to explain that to the individual. I would emphasize that I acknowledge their circumstances but must fulfill my obligations by following regulations. This upholds fairness while minimizing harm. My role requires navigating between compassion for their situation and compliance with laws and protocols. I would aim for transparency regarding the consent requirements while validating their capability as much as possible within appropriate boundaries.

student-742

Interview

Well, the main issue here is that if the baby keeps screaming and crying, it could disturb the other passengers who may have important events the next day and need a good night's sleep. Also, the parents are likely feeling embarrassed about their baby's behavior. So we need to take both sides into account. What I would do is approach the parents in a polite, private manner so as not to embarrass them publicly. I would ask if anything is wrong with the baby - maybe the baby is hungry, needs a snack, doesn't have any toys, etc. Gathering more information first allows me to make a more informed decision about how to help. I could then offer some alternatives, like playing with the baby myself to provide a calming distraction if the baby is just feeling stressed from the plane environment. If the baby does settle down, problem solved. But if not, as a last resort I would put in earphones and listen to loud music so I don't hear the crying and can get some rest. The goal is to find a mutually considerate solution that respects the needs of both the parents and other passengers.

student-719

Interview

This past summer, I had the opportunity to work in landscape construction as a laborer, my first job of this kind. I felt nervous starting out. When I couldn't find retail or similar roles, I took a chance on this position given my active interests. On my first day, it was an emotional toll and I doubted myself, having never done manual labor before. It gave me empathy for those doing this daily. Waking at 6am and working to 6pm was grueling. But I persevered by learning from others, utilizing resources, and pushing through. I stuck with it for a few months. While challenging being new to this work, it was a growth experience. Stepping outside my comfort zone built resilience and appreciation for the hard work done by trade professionals who perform these demanding jobs every day. In the end, I'm grateful to have developed new skills and insights.

student-747

Interview

My perspective on our role in activism is that physicians usually act on a more individual level as they're treating symptoms that patients may have. But I also believe that there are many health issues which are systemic, and that physicians should do their part in addressing these issues, maybe even appealing to government bodies when they don't agree with a piece of legislation. But at the same time, their primary responsibility is activism on a patient level. I believe that to be a competent physician, the doctor always needs to have the patient in mind and advocate for the patient's self interests.

student-818

Interview

I believe it is ethical for any profession to strike if collective conditions and compensation are unjust, regardless of the immediacy or urgency of services. Nobody should be forced to work under inadequate conditions. Though there may be concerns about physicians failing duties to society by striking, as humans they have rights to free speech and standing up for beliefs. Healthcare is critical, but doctors deserve fair treatment too. However, certain steps could be taken to mitigate the effects on patients. Doctors could continue providing emergency and urgent care or give advanced notice so hospitals can make alternate arrangements. With the right precautions to avoid harm, physicians deserve to leverage strikes when necessary, just as any mistreated worker would. The goal would be raising awareness and advocating for change while minimizing disruption to patients.

student-746

Interview

From what I understand in the prompt, I'm a physician. A 16 year old patient comes to me and wants a specific procedure. Her parents are in disagreement with that procedure. I'm kind of asked, who do I have to listen to in this situation? This is actually a very difficult situation. The ethical dilemma is here on think. First is autonomy versus being able to make a well informed decision and regarding the family's dynamic. Before I say what I would do, there's many perspectives I have to look at. At first there's a perspective of the patient, the 16 year old. Then there's a perspective of the family as well. And the last perspective is the perspective of the physician with the relationship with both the family and the patient. I'm going to discuss a bit of pros and cons within each perspective. In the perspective of the patient, the patient comes to the physician with trust. They come with, I don't know what the procedure is. This can be a life changing procedure. It can be a procedure that can enhance confidence. It can be a procedure that can treat an illness. Depending on the situation, I think if a patient comes to you with trust, that trust should be taken without the most importance. By accepting that procedure and doing it for the 16 year old, you're allowing them to keep having that confidence of physicians. If you don't do that treatment, you can possibly hinder a future relationship with the physician because the 60 year old might be upset and might not want to seek medical attention anymore. These are important things to consider. The family's perspective, I think it's a very similar perspective to the child. I know that in most cases, a family really wants what's best for their child. I know that they're looking out for the best interest of their child. We have to understand that maybe they're scared of this procedure. Maybe they don't know what the procedure entails and what the actual reason behind why the 16 year old wants that procedure. Lastly, it's the physician. The physician, I think, in this situation has to be well informed of the decision he's taking, because he has to make sure that the patient is well informed, that the family is well informed, that he tries his best to keep the relationship as positive as possible through this whole interaction with the disagreement within the family. For what I would do, if I were to listen to the patient or the family, this is very contextual based. I have to speak with the patient. I have to determine and see if they're in the mental capacity to make such decisions on their own. I have to understand if they understand the risk and complications of the procedure. I also have to see if this is a medically necessary treatment as it might not even be medically necessary. I have to gather that information. I have to know the reasoning of why my patient wants to have this procedure and if they're in the consent, if they're in the capacity to make the decision. If I can tell they're mature enough to make that choice on their own, I don't know if there's an age of consent in Canada, but I would grant that procedure to that patient should it be legal. Now, if they're not in the capacity and they don't understand what's going on and they want to do it for unnecessary reasons and put unnecessary risk on their body, and I can cause kind of harm to them by doing this procedure, I would not offer the treatment and not because I would listen to the family, but because I don't think it's the right course of action medically. But in either case, I think the approach I would take is to see if they're well informed, if they have the capacity to make that decision. After I make that choice, regardless of the choice, I will show that I still care for the patient. I will remain as a kind of shoulder to lean on for knowledge after the procedure to give them access to post depends if it's operations like post operative care or follow up procedures or follow up visits to see if that procedure went well. I will also speak with the family and let them know why I made my choice, that I didn't just do it to undermine them, but I did it because I believe that that procedure was medically necessary and that their child had the capacity to make that choice. But in large, I would try to keep my relationship with both the patient and the family as positive as possible as this may have long term implications on them wanting to seek medical attention and it can have long term negative consequences if I don't maintain that relationship, if they trust in the medical system.

student-832

Interview

Growing up as an immigrant, I've noticed healthcare disparities. In Palestine, my brother has diabetes and asthma, requiring frequent hospital visits. Despite limited supplies, doctors did everything to make us feel safe and reassure us of quality care. After immigrating to Canada, we had plentiful resources but faced cultural and language barriers. As I learned English, I translated between doctors and my parents. Though challenged, physicians welcomed us, guided us to resources, and brought in Arabic speakers to ensure excellent care for my brother. Later, working with patients myself, I strived to implement the same compassionate approach I had experienced. By listening empathetically and understanding obstacles to care, I could help vulnerable patients feel heard. Oftentimes, they simply need someone to listen. As a physician, this compassion is so important. Shadowing doctors, I've seen their leadership role on the healthcare team, delegating tasks and making final calls. Their long-term guidance through patients' journeys also resonated with me. I aim to provide that ongoing medical and emotional support to create lasting change. Advocating for patients while solving complex cases over many years embodies my goals as a physician. My experiences navigating disparities as an immigrant exposed me to physician practices that resonated deeply - patient-centered care and lifelong dedication. These inspire me to pursue medicine to listen to, support, and empower patients in overcoming any barriers on the path to health.

student-750

Interview

In this complex scenario, my priority would be addressing the needs of this girl and doing everything in my power to assist, since negligence could lead to further harm. I believe the first step would be to speak with her privately about her concerns with sleeping pills and motivations for using them. This conversation would allow me to better understand her intentions and assess the situation to determine if my intervention or someone else's is necessary. If I leave this issue unattended, she may see another doctor unaware of her history who prescribes sleeping pills, potentially causing harm. So having an open discussion to grasp her perspective and needs would be critical before deciding how to proceed. My goal is preventing greater issues by proactively engaging with care and concern.

student-728

Interview

In this situation, a few social implications of a free needle exchange program would be definitely a positive benefit to the current vulnerable populations that may not have access to clean utensils, may not have the funds or the ability to get SDI checked. They also could be a population of the lower socioeconomic status as often drug users are. And so a program like this would definitely help allow them to give them a space where they can perform activities in a safe manner, although it's a very important way to stress harm reduction. So a medical implication of this would be that the needle exchange program could allow for the reduced risk of HIV transmission, for hepatitis transmission. So that would definitely be a benefit to the population that this program would be targeting. Additionally, this program definitely has the added benefit of providing a physician referral. So it can allow these patients or these potential patients that now they know that their screen has come back positive with something, they might not have a primary care physician or have the funds to go to an urgent clinic. So it would be beneficial that a physician referral is given to the patient because they have somewhere to go to and they know that after receiving this information there is a next step for them. So that could be a good medical implication as well. Another potentially social medical implication of this program could be that the existence of a needle exchange program. Some could argue that this would provide a motivating factor to continue in these dangerous activities. However, it can be also argued that a needle exchange program can help with ensuring that communicable diseases and active infectious diseases actually go down within a population. And additionally for a viable alternative. Some viable alternatives could be pharmacies that hand out or provide clean needles to populations that ask and also a safe place to dispose used needles so that they aren't in the streets or where someone can accidentally step on a sharp needle that's been injected with someone else and prevent potentially transferred for a communicable disease. Additionally, another viable alternative could be free STI testing at local clinics. A lot of states and local regional health programs offer clinics that provide free and anonymous sexual health disease testing. That could also be beneficial as well.

student-826

Interview

In comparing laughter to medicine, the main point is to emphasize the vital role emotions play in people's health. No matter your medical expertise or technological proficiency, a crucial aspect is empathy. Being able to express kindness, care, and positive emotions through smiling, welcoming body language, and laughter is key - especially with distressed populations like children in healthcare settings. The statement underscores the significance of emotions, which I hope to apply in my medical career. Medical knowledge is important, but emotional intelligence and the ability to connect matter immensely too. This reminder to incorporate compassion and positivity will guide me as I work to improve patients' wellbeing.

student-729

Interview

I can share an experience when I was working at a nursing home during the pandemic and facilitating visits between residents and their families. To give a bit more context, I started in the summer of 2020 working at this nursing home. At the time we had just started to open up visits between residents and their families, but all of the visits were outside and they needed to maintain physical distancing. The schedule for the visits was really tightly packed because people hadn't seen their family members in a long time and so there wasn't a ton of time for each visit - I believe they had 30 minutes. Our schedule was pretty much always full because we only had so many spots so that everyone could maintain physical distancing. It was important that I was bringing residents downstairs and outside to their visits on time so that they got the full amount of time with their family members. That was really important to me because it had been so long since they had seen their family and it's really good for their mental wellbeing. I wanted them to be able to have this time. In an effort to ensure that I was on time for the schedule, I would go up early to their rooms and I made sure that I had enough time to bring them down. But the issue was I wasn't trained on any sort of lifts, so if a patient or a resident was in bed or needed to use the bathroom before going down for their visit, I did not have the training to do that and it would have been unsafe if I had attempted to do that. So I had to go and ask a PSW or a nurse to help me get the resident ready to go outside in those cases. Now, this was difficult because sometimes the PSWs were pretty much always very busy. They had a lot of residents and needed to be doing showers or helping with feeding and so on. And so I felt really badly going and asking for help, but again, I could not do it on my own without jeopardizing the safety of the resident. So I went and I would ask them and I had a positive relationship with the PSWs, so they didn't mind helping, but I could tell that they were very overwhelmed and I wanted to make the process a bit easier. What I did was from then on, I would print off a schedule of the visits and bring that to the nurses and PSWs every morning. It would be posted in the nurse's room every morning so that they knew when each resident was going down to their visits and they could prepare when it was most convenient for them. They weren't in the middle of showering a resident when I was trying to find them to toilet another resident. I also asked them for their feedback - was this working for them? It seemed to be working better, but I wanted to make sure that I was integrating feedback from them. They actually asked me, after their shift change in the afternoon, if I could come up and just give them a rundown of the afternoon visit schedule, which I was happy to do, and that let things run a lot smoother. It also let me get all of the residents down safely to their visits and in a timely manner so they could have that time with their families. It built my relationship and a positive relationship with the PSWs and nurses because I think they understood that I respected their time and I could see that they were very busy. Although I needed their help, I think that they felt respected in the process. I also made sure that I was helping them in return. I didn't want to just be taking and asking them for help. I wanted to ease their burden as well. So I would help them with feeding at meal times and with the snack cart. I would spend time with residents who took a bit more of their time attention wise and just help them out in those ways. I think that's really important in a future career as a physician, because I'm not going to have all of the answers, depending on my specialty. There's going to be times where I'm going to need help from other physicians, from other specialties, and I'll need help from other members of the healthcare team in order to optimize patient outcomes. I want to ensure that although I need help, I am not just taking from others and I'm also contributing to this healthcare team and communicating with them in order to come to the best solution for our patients.

student-802

Interview

I'll get right into the prompt about whether physicians should be able to lie to or withhold truth from patients, even if it's for the patient's own good. I recognize this can be a difficult situation, especially with difficult news where a physician may feel sharing information could trigger an undesired response in the patient. However, looking at different perspectives, the physician is involved in care delivery but the patient's perspective must also be considered. If physicians aren't transparent and don't fully deliver information, especially if the patient wants to know, I think physicians have a duty to tell the truth. I don't think lying benefits patients. Transparency fosters trust between provider and patient, which is necessary for the patient to also be truthful. If a physician lies or withholds truth, what's stopping a patient from withholding critical information affecting their care? It gives a sense of practicing paternalistic rather than patient-centered care, and not treating the patient as an equal person deserving respect. Telling the truth fosters trust. It's difficult if not impossible for a physician to fully know how someone will react to news, so just because it's difficult doesn't mean it should be withheld. There are diagnoses where hearing it may do more harm in the moment by causing panic. But the patient still has a right to know. If test results could be false positives, you can suggest more tests be done but still inform the patient. You cannot withhold just because you think it will do more harm than good. Contingencies like mental illness are important - you still tell the truth but may alter how you deliver it through pacing information, softening delivery, etc. But the information itself, I believe patients have a right to know.

student-813

Interview

In this situation, I would carefully weigh the potential outcomes of a liver transplant for both patients. For the 64-year-old alcoholic, there is some uncertainty whether they would adhere to post-transplant treatments and lifestyle changes needed to maintain health. In contrast, the younger mother of three may have greater probability of benefit and compliance. Age is a factor, as the mother has more expected years of life ahead. There are also consequences for her children if she does not survive. However, if I could speak to the alcoholic and feel confident they would commit to sobriety and medical care, I would likely select them for transplant. Adherence is the key factor. I'd want to know the duration of alcoholism and any history of prior treatments failed due to non-compliance. If the alcoholic has repeatedly been non-adherent, I would select the mother to receive the liver. Her age and responsibility to her children tip the balance. But with demonstrated commitment to treatment from the alcoholic, I would support transplanting them over the slightly younger candidate. The decision rests significantly on my assessment of postoperative compliance to ensure success.

student-783

Interview

This is a sensitive situation, as public health should be the top priority, yet tracking individuals' movements can impose major privacy risks that make citizens feel exposed. Given these competing concerns, the best approach may be finding alternative public health measures that lower disease spread while respecting privacy. Suggestions already implemented worldwide include masking mandates, vaccination requirements, social distancing, and limits on gatherings. While controversial, dissecting perspectives on why they help can build understanding. Officials can share unbiased data on masks, hygiene and distancing to educate citizens that these measures effectively reduce transmission based on evidence. It's also key to remind the public of the goal - reducing illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths. With limited hospital capacity, surging cases can overburden healthcare workers and restrict care for other emergencies. By informing citizens of these broad implications, they may better comprehend the purpose of safety measures despite privacy tradeoffs. In summary, educating the public with clear evidence-based rationale for interventions can promote informed choices. Citizens may then continue safety practices willingly, knowing the societal benefits, while retaining autonomy over health decisions and minimizing invasive tracking. A thoughtful public health approach requires openness on all sides to find solutions.

student-766

Interview

As frustrating as it might be to hear a parent does not want to vaccinate their newborn, I believe the parent is still responsible for making that decision for their child. The newborn cannot be considered a mature minor to make decisions, so it is up to the parent. However, I would still do everything in my power to try to convince the parents to vaccinate. I would ask to meet with them and say I understand their concern - there is a lot of misinformation out there and it can be hard to discern reality from folly. I would tell them the facts honestly - vaccinating their newborn will significantly reduce the chance of developing the disease. If after hearing the facts they still believe their newborn should not be vaccinated, then I have to listen to the parents' choice, because they are making the decision for the child. I would need to let the parents decide what is best for their child.

student-816

Interview

Thank you for sharing this difficult situation. As physicians, we have a responsibility to disclose medical information to patients with decision-making capacity, even if family members object. Before acting, I would first meet privately with the parents to understand their hesitations around disclosure. They may have legitimate concerns about their son's mental health that I should consider. However, I would also explain the importance of respecting the boy's autonomy, given his terminal illness. Assuming he has decision-making capacity, he has a right to direct his own care based on his values. Withholding information could damage our therapeutic relationship and trust. I would offer to assess the boy's capacity and, if appropriate, slowly disclose details to him in a supportive manner. This may alleviate the parents' concerns. I would highlight that shared decision-making between us, the parents and the boy would lead to the best care plan. If after discussion the parents refuse disclosure due to risks like self-harm, I may defer briefly. But the boy's right to direct his care should be paramount, assuming capacity. Over time, I would continue advocating for transparency and autonomy in a compassionate, non-judgmental manner. Respectfully bridging this conflict between parents and patient requires patience and care. My goal is to reach a resolution where the boy receives key information while also addressing family concerns. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-830

Interview

Having volunteered in a long-term care home, I understand the difficulty this situation poses, having witnessed patients pass away. While fulfilling your duties, you must remain mindful and empathetic on this sensitive topic. I would approach the family privately in a comfortable setting to offer emotional support and resources. I would also take time to reflect on my own feelings, as this is distressing for staff too. Practicing self-care and speaking with other healthcare practitioners to address my needs is important. My goal is providing compassionate care for the grieving family while recognizing the emotional toll on myself and taking steps to manage that burden as well. This requires an empathetic approach for the family combined with conscious efforts to tend to my own wellbeing during an extremely difficult time.

student-741

Interview

In 8th grade, my elementary school basketball team was preparing for the regional tournament, which would be my final year at that school. As the team's leading scorer and offensive facilitator, a lot of pressure was on me to lead us to the championship. While I was confident in my abilities, I also knew the competition we would face. The day before the tournament, I was suddenly overcome with doubt about whether I could effectively marshal my teammates to play their roles and win. A big reason was that I wasn't very good at motivational speeches. I preferred to lead by example through my play. I knew I had to give some kind of speech to set the tone, but I struggled mightily to come up with anything good enough. The morning of the tournament, I still didn't have a plan and wondered if I would give a speech at all. But I knew my team needed that spark. So before our first game, I gathered everyone and gave a short, 1-minute speech. I clearly communicated our goal to win the championship and laid out how each player would contribute based on their strengths. I said I would lead the scoring and create opportunities for them. We didn't win the tournament, losing in the finals. But I was proud of what we accomplished against tough competition. A big factor was me overcoming self-doubt to motivate my team. What enabled me to push past the doubt was recalling positive moments of camaraderie with my teammates. Seeing our less experienced players score late in games reminded me of our strengths. Those memories motivated me to give the speech that ultimately helped lead us to the finals. Whenever self-doubt creeps in about your leadership abilities, remember your strengths and find ways to mitigate weaknesses. Focusing on past successes can help overcome doubt to make a difference. For me, that was the key to performing well under pressure.

student-771

Interview

The prompt I'll be discussing centers around Dr. Chong, a physician who has been recommending homeopathic remedies for his patients. Homeopathic remedies are an alternative form of medicine involving biological materials from plants or animals. As stated, there isn't enough evidence that this actually works. Furthermore, Dr. Chong himself doesn't believe they work, but he assigns these treatments to patients with mild or subjective symptoms because he thinks they won't cause harm and will provide reassurance. I'm asked to discuss the ethical problems with this behavior. First, Dr. Chong doesn't believe the treatments work but makes patients think they do. This takes away from treatments patients could or should be getting. He's brushing off concerns because he thinks they'll naturally subside. This violates the principle of "first, do no harm." While he may not directly cause harm, he causes patients to not seek other treatments because patients often trust their doctors, especially long-term. So long-term patients may not get second opinions and will take ineffective treatments. It's based on his personal assessment that symptoms are mild or subjective. But misdiagnoses occur, and he puts patients in danger of not seeking other opinions or treatments that could actually help. Under the CanMEDS framework, doctors should be community health leaders, but he is failing by promoting unproven remedies. Even non-patients may start believing these work if they know someone recommended by Dr. Chong. They may disregard other professionals' advice. Dr. Chong has failed as a health expert by giving legitimacy to this medicine. Other physicians may have patients citing Dr. Chong, thinking if he recommends it, it must work. More people may believe in homeopathic remedies even though there's no evidence. Lastly, it works like a placebo, but there's not enough evidence that placebos have the positive effects Dr. Chong believes. In summary, he violates "first, do no harm" by dissuading patients from effective care, fails as a community health leader by promoting unproven remedies, and fails as a health expert by legitimizing homeopathy despite lack of evidence.

student-811

Interview

This is an unfortunate scenario, and I'm sorry this is happening to this woman. The absolute first thing I would do is make sure she is physically okay without being invasive since I don't know her. I would visually assess if she has any wounds needing immediate care. After ensuring her physical health is stable, I would speak with her to see if she is emotionally okay. Personally, I would not be alright with someone routinely hitting me. I would want to ensure she understands this is not okay and that she is in a sound mental state. Slowly, I would steer the conversation towards problem-solving. The initial priority is confirming her physical and emotional well-being in this terrible situation. Once that baseline is established through compassionate dialogue, we could begin to address how to move forward.

student-765

Interview

Thank you for your question. My responsibility here remains maintaining a positive relationship with the patient and family. If this reflects on my general behavior, it could also impact coworkers and other patients. To understand the situation better, I would first approach the patient, as they are my primary concern. In a comfortable, non-confrontational setting, I would gauge how they've been feeling and if anything is bothering them about treatment or my bedside manner. I would open a conversation to discuss any concerns and assure them I welcome feedback to provide the best care possible. If the patient seems willing to talk, it would be a good opportunity to take any feedback, reflect on it, and apply strategies to better support them. I would also speak to my supervisor to understand the full situation before approaching the family, so I have information on both sides. Again, it would be a private, non-judgmental way to make them feel comfortable explaining their concerns. I want to gain feedback on how I could improve and better support their family. If I can easily fix something that would benefit the situation, I will reflect and try to implement their suggestions to support them through this open conversation. I would also gauge any underlying biases occurring on both sides, like cultural or religious differences I'm not considering, or my own biases against patients - an important self-reflection for any physician. While doing so, I might better understand the family's biases regarding my race, ethnicity, gender, etc. that impact how I implement their feedback. Most importantly, my job is ensuring patient wellbeing. I would encourage and welcome their suggestions and feedback. I would also assure them that if our dynamic is not working, I'm happy to refer them to another physician for treatment continuity, as their wellbeing is my priority. If another physician can interact more positively, I would do so. Moving forward, I would also get perspectives from other healthcare professionals.

student-824

No results found.

There are no results with this criteria. Try changing your search.

You earned points ✨

You need more points to do that

Library of Responses

Videoath Verified.

Trusted by 3871 others.

Curate a realistic interview.

Didn't know what to say?

Category Breakdown

Responses feedback score

Peer Progression

How it works

Sign Up to Track Your Journey

Earn Points

Unlock Resources

Take on Tests and Get Stat Insights

Member

's recent activity

Resources

How it works