Library of Responses

Review and learn from interview and Casper test responses.

100+ Interview Responses
700+ Casper Responses

We reimagined a fantastic resource and added a few more of our own.

We've helped hundreds of learners get into their healthcare profession with these curated interview practice resources. Practice and improve with us for the best results.

Become confident with our metrics-based assurance

We've reviewed thousands of responses to reliably calibrate your response. Feel confident; you've earned it.

We're with you every step of the way.

Our guided learning paths are honed by years of mentorship and successful applicants, backed by thousands of reviews. So go ahead, start your journey with confidence!

Videoath Verified.

We routinely check on our resources to ensure they're up to date and continue to be a good reference.

Trusted by 3871 others.

You're in good company. We update this counter to let you know who else completed the prompt.

Curate a realistic interview.

Bookmark a question so you can get back to it later. Become a member and build your own list now!

Didn't know what to say?

Read de-identified and anonymized peer responses.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Tag

Showing 0 of 100

Casper

As a high schoool student myself, it is apparent that I would get shocked. However, handling the situation calmly, I will first of all approach the student. What is seen by your eyes is often not the case. Just based on my sight of seeing him smoke marijuana, I will not directly jump into a conclusion of reporting him. He could be using it for a medical reason perhaps. After approaching him, I will calmly ask him if he knows that is marijuana and that it is not proper for him to smoke it. Only after getting more information from him, I will report him to the supervisor so that such cases don't happen in the future. However, I will accompany him to the supervisor if he is willing to tell the teacher himself.

student-562

Casper

I would go up to them and talk with them. I would ask them why are they throwing trash on the ground and ask for them to pick it up and find the nearest trash can and dispose of it there, directing them to any ones I know of. I find people often do this stuff but will throw it out properly if mentioned. If they make a fight I try to calm it down and throw out the trash myself.

student-377

Casper

I don't believe it is right to adopt the new puppy without first looking to find it's owner. Since it's a young pu[ppy, the parents of the puppy and their owner may be worreid for it's safety and looking for it. Keeping the puppy wouldn't resolve their stress, and rather I would suggest helping him find it's owner by palcing flyers around the area. I would contact animal shelters seeing if they know of a missing puppy, and ask if they haven't to look after the puppy untill it's owners are found. If they aren't foudn and he still wnats to keep it, I believe it is alright to let him .

student-614

Casper

The most pressing issue here is an ethical dilemma regarding whether to turn yourself in or not. I would take a look at my situation, and I would understand the desire to drive away and not get caught if I were in a serious financial situation or in a rush. At the same time, the person who got hit may also feel upset and be in a similar situation. In the end of both cases, I would not drive away because it could be unfair for the other person, so I would gather more information to see how the other person feels and their current situation by leaving a contact number if I was in a rush. If I was in a serious financial situation, then I would ask the other person if I could undergo a payment plan or look for other resources in the community I could use to support myself.

student-117

Casper

I am worried that Robert and Sarah are going to cheat. Since I care for the best interest of my friends, I don't want them to cheat because they could risk getting in trouble and because I recognize that cheating just leads to people not learning the material. I hope to have a conversation with them to explain that

student-436

Casper

I would not immediately fine the teenagers, I would want to get a proper assessment of the situation as it is possible that they were completely unaware that they were on private property. I would give them a warning and politely ask them to pick up their things and move to a public place to continue their event. If they comply, then I don't see the point in fining them, but if they don't comply then I would have to be firm with my warning that a will be issued for trespassing.

student-499

Casper

I would likely give the stranger the benefit of the doubt that this is likely not something that they do on a daily basis so I would not confront them. I would instead wait until they moved away and pick up the garbage and put it in the trash. I do not know what is going on with that person and I am not likely going to change or improve their behaviour by confronting them about it.

student-140

Casper

I would announce that due to a discrepancy in our financial status, we are not as successful as we had thought to be and because of this we unfortuantely have to lay off employees. I would ensure not to explicitly state why, as I do not want to risk embarassing the employee that made the mistake. I would also console with the employees that I have to lay off that I am deeply sorry for having to do so, and that I will be willing to connect them with other companies that are hiring. I would also offer to write any recommendations and references.

student-572

Casper

The pros of decreased corporate taxing include increased funds that can go towards supporting employees e.g. improved technology, materials, paid leaves, and allowing companies to function more flexibly. The cons of this include a sense of unfairness between the upper and lower class, and those working may be negatively impacted by continually having money cut from their paycheck. Over all, I believe the cons outweigh the pros, as companies require working employees to function at their best to help the company thrive, and increased taxing of individuals can negatively affect mental and financial health.

student-645

Casper

Although the way Jessica's parents are treating her is completely wrong and unjust, I understand how Jessica's concern on being sent to a foster home. However, I believe that I must take action, as child abuse should be taken seriously. I would first talk to Jessica in a private and empathetic manner, and let her know that I am sorry for everything that she is going through. I would then stress to her that her family situation is not okay and that her parents are not treating her well. I would validate her concerns, but also let her know that she could be much happier in a different environment, with caretakers that treat her properly. I would also offer my assistance in the matter to ensure that she will be taken care of differently.

student-122

Casper

I believe it is because it propagates kindness, and a culture of empathy and compassion. I think it is safe ot assume that all people generally want to be treated well, so by treating others as you want to be treated, you can reflect on your actions to behave in positive ways towards others. It think it also transcends cultures, religion, and comes down to the human nature of wanting to be treated well and inspiring people to treat others in the same manner.

student-584

Casper

I believe that it means that a person does not need a reason to be curious. If someone wants to know about something, they don't need to explain their hunger for knowledge, their curiosity. Humans tend to want to understand the world around them. It is why we explain unexplainable phenomena by using a religious lens. It is also why we put such importance on science and scientific discovery.

student-389

Casper

This scenario requires balancing ethics with professionalism. It is unclear the nature of my relationship to my co-worker, if this has happened before, and the overall team dynamic. On one hand, it is unethical to claim someone else's ideas as your own and receive praise for it; speaking up would award praise and credit the right person. On the other hand, it may be viewed as unprofessional to speak up and interrupt the meeting with this issue. I would try to handle this professionally while making it clear that I developed the idea, for example by politely asking Luca questions about the idea that he would not be able to answer, and I could step in to suggest things. I would also have an open discussion with Luca after the meeting about why he took my idea and how we can move forward as team members.

student-34

Casper

No because it is unethical in the sense that I should address the test in the best of my capabilities instead of cheating. Cheating does not help me in the longterm because I don't fully understand the material and in a medical setting that is not good because I could put people's lives at risk because I don't understand the material.

student-527

Casper

My main concern is the driver drinking alcohol and driving when it is unsafe to do so. My other thought is wondering how much has this person drank, was it alcoholic beer, and did I hear the conversation correctly. Sometimes when you overhear something it is not in the same context as you initially assumed.

student-551

Casper

dans cette situation, je suis inquiète pour ma collègue et pour les prochains clients. ayant vu que ma collegue semblait avoir bu beaucoup, je serais inquiete quelle ne soit pas en possession de tous ses moyens et quelle risquait sa vie et celle de ses clients en conduisant sous linfluence de lalcool. je serais aussi inquiete quelle perde son emploi sil était révélé quelle ait conduit apres avoir bu, vu que cest contre les règle

student-185

Casper

It was my first season playing with a mens soccer team. Everyone was ages 30 or older, and I was only 19 at the time. Theyve been playing together for many years and have a strong bond/friendship with each other. At halftime of a game, they were discussing tactics since we were losing 2-1. I wanted to give my input about a tactical change we could make, but was too timid. I didnt know how theyd react or if my suggestion was helpful, and was too scared of being embarassed for it.

student-229

Casper

This is a hard situation as you do not want you and your gorup members to be trrated unfairly. The workload should be equal and due to the friend who is not completeling their work, the tasks become harder for your team. I would speak to the other group memebr privately and ask they why they are lying, in a non judgemtnal way. If there is somthing going on in their life that is causing them to need to lie, then I will try to support them where I can. But, I still would explain to them how their actions are affecting the rest of the team. I would asked them to speak to the rest of th group members and explain their situation so we can all work to gatherer to fins a solution

student-165

Casper

Cheryl should be concered with the wellbeinfg if her patent and the stress it well cause on her firned if she was going to message her about his cancer. It is always important to first gather more information before reaching a conclusion. In this case, it'd be best if she talks to the grandfather and asks him if he wants his family members to know or not since it is his right. If he doesn't want them to know, then it is best that Cheryl doesn't message her friend breach his rights. IF he does, then it would be fine if she messaged her and tol her the bad news and helped both of them with this istuaion.

student-397

Casper

I feel upset that my manager is dismissing this man. Although he may be homeless, he is a human being just like everyone and needs to eat. I feel that my manager is putting the success of her buisness before a basic human right. In this situation I would be inclined to reason with my manager that the man should be able to order food just like any other customer.

student-582

Casper

This is difficult because one the one side the man is worried about the virus and whether the clothes could transmit the virus. on the other hand the person with the scrubs, feels attacked and suffered probably a lot during the pandemic( long shifts, not able to see their family). Both of them should communicated in a better way, but both sides have pros and cons

student-641

Casper

A professional that does not look confused in his job would give reassurance to customers because they put their trust into the professional to get a job done. For example with a physician, they should not put unecessary stress on a patient when they already have a lot on their plate.

student-417

Casper

I would gather information as why the government would outlaw circumcision and the research behind it. I would feel discriminated as it will be against my religious belief not to circumcise my child. it is important to hom=nour every culture and every belief as long as you are killing or disrespecting anybody.

student-677

Casper

I was working for the red cross helping with covid testing for travellers crossing the border. I had a problem with how the manager was handling the rate at which we conducted the tests especially for older travellers. I was hoping we could take more time with them, but was afraid of speaking up. I spoke with a coworker about my concerns and they validated similar feelings, and together we spoke with the manager and were able to implement a more thorough response to help older travellers.

student-161

Casper

Socrates meant that in life there are so many experiences that we can learn from. An inquisitive thirsty mind is more receptive towards learning and getting themselve more arare rather than an arrogant mind. we should be like sponge soaking all the knowledge from the world from anyone , anytime and anywhere and should not confide ourselves just to textbooks.

student-628

Casper

Yes. This is a breach of privacy. I WOULD STOP THEM AND GENTLY ASK WHY THEY ARE ITNRESTED IN GOING THROUGHT HEIR PHONES. If their reason is for a social gag, then I would gently explain how it may go in the wring direction and how it is a breach of privacy. I would aslo temidn him or her how it would affect the friednship. if its is seriousissue and the person is trying to acces the phoien becuase of emergency I WOULD FFER MY OHOEN FOR EMERGNECY USE BUT SINCE THE PERSON IS NO THERE USING THEIR PHOEN IS UNETHICAL.

student-364

Casper

Je lui demanderais si tout va bien. Même s'il s'Agit de mon rôle modèle, il ne va sans dire qu'il faut que les tâches de la clinique soient bien effectuées étant donné la présence de patients. Je m'inquiéterais aussi pour mon superviseur et lui demanderais s'il a besoin d'aide dans ses tâches et d'avoir recours à de l'aide si c'est le cas. Il est important de le faire et de lui parler de manière respectueuse malgré son état. Je demanderais aussi l'avis des autres bénévoles/collègues pour avoir leur avis de la situation

student-601

Casper

Although he may want to help his friend Jessica, it may be best for him not to share the database with her as it be not help her understand the material better. Instead, he should ask Jessica if she has used any of the schools after school tutoring services that could help her perform better in the course

student-642

Casper

I would first comfort my friend and ensure that they are feeling alright as they were clearly bothered by the situation. Once I know my friend is doing better or if I'm with other friends, once I know they are being taken care of by another friend, I would approach the person who took the video. It is important to be non-confrontational and to simply explain to the videotaper that my friend and I do not like being videotaped and we request that they delete the video. I would suggest maybe taking the video from another angle or if they wanted that specific moment on tape and I have the footage I would offer to share it with them as I can guarantee that my friend and I are not in it. If the person is refusing to delete the video, then I would calmly ask someone such as security for help as it is important to my friend that they not be on video.

student-452

Casper

There are some ways in which I do but other ways in which I dont. I understand wanting to feed the poor, as access to food should be a basic human right. I understand showing empathy and compassion to these people as they are human just like everyone else. Though, stealing to do so is immoral is there are other means of attaining to food to help the poor. Perhaps asking a food bank for a donation and that way you can help without taking from others.

student-186

Casper

No, I don't believe that they should be laid for that specific purpose. The hospital is a very complex environment and requires many people's expertise. So, even if their teaching skills aren't up to par, their clinical skills can still be used to help other patients who are at the hospital.

student-663

Casper

Teamwork can fail due to a multitude of reasons including miscommunication between team members, unequal distribution of work, and lack of team meetings. Communication within a team is very important for its success because, without it, other members of the team would feel out of the loop and will be unable to coordinate effectively to achieve a common goal. Moreover, if the work is not equally distributed then it can be difficult for p

student-246

Casper

If the test bank contains questions from this class which we were not supposed to access, or which infringe upon academic misconduct, then I will not purchase the test bank as I do not wish to engage in any form of cheating, malpractice or inappropriate academic behaviour even if I was struggling.

student-329

Casper

This can be a difficult situation as you want to be kind to your friend but you also want to follow the rules of the school. I would first come up to him in a calm and non judgmental way and tell him that smoking on school property is prohibited. I would give him a change to move off of the school yard or stop smoking. If he refused to do so, I would tell someone at the school to ensure that the policy is enforced. I would also want to make sure he is doing okay by asking him if there is anythgin going on in his personal life that I may be able to help with witout overstepping boundaries

student-148

Casper

I would try to understand how my boss feels about me. I would always be respectful and try to plead my case. I would recommend him to try watching the camera to see who could have possibly stolen the money. I would show to the boss that I am a good worker with amazing ethics. Doing all my work and going beyond. I would work hard and do all my tasks. Everything on time. Shows that I really care about working and for said business.

student-536

Casper

Since I am Dorothys best friend I would know she spent her time with her boyfriend and may have become dependent on him being around. This would then allow me to speak with her in privately about how she felt about their breakup and ask her more personal questions than if I was a strange. I would then know her favorite things, hopefully and I could suggest we do those together so she didn't feel alone. I would also suggest that she either talk with me or a therapist so she can have a safe place to pour her feelings out so we can get her back out in the world and doing what she likes.

student-54

Casper

I will simply report that someone else has posted the post on social media. I would refrain from naming any of my colleagues as suspects. The account may have got hacked, and I simply do not have enough information to tell them whether I think it was one of the other people who posted it.

student-395

Casper

Political views may differ. Having one political view doesn't make a person worse than someone who has a different political view. in a work environment, it is important that we accept others irrespective of their political views. We need to accept diversity as having differing opinions has been proven helpful in many cases. Hence, just having a differing view than my supervisor will never convince me to change a job if I am not treated differently or forced to change my opinions.

student-334

Casper

I was working at the vaccination center and someone was feeling ill. As a medical professionnal, my job is to take care of our patients. I called for help and made sure to stabilize the patient. I told the family baout the situation and told them the next steps. When the patient was feeling better I made sure to give him advise for next time such as eating a full meal and hydrating yourself before getting the next shot.

student-657

Casper

À mon avis, les tarifs de stationnement devraient être abaissés. Il est important pour la santé mentale des patients d'avoir des proches qui peuvent les accompagner à travers leur rétablissement, et la santé mentale est directement relié à la santé physique de ces patients. L'accessibilité aux soins de qualité est un enjeu majeur, et pour arriver à un système de santé plus équitable, des prix abordables devraient être offerts. De plus, l'hôpital pourrait amasser de lA'rgent grâce à des levées de fonds. Bien des bénévoles se porteraient volontier à cette organisation. Les dons volontaires pourraient également être demandés.

student-602

Casper

My mother and my sister have a very tough relationship. They are often fighting, which compounds due to my mother's physical and mental health issues. I promised my sister that we would call every weekend over zoom to work together (ever since I moved to university) so that she wouldn't feel alone in the house. However, during exam season, I found myself cancelling as I felt like I needed private time to study hard. Looking back, although my sister very kindly understood my position,m I feel very remorseful for having taken that time from her, as I now realize how important it was to her. I have committed since then to always showing up, even if it's with my camera off and just typing in chat, because I know how much she needs me.

student-144

Casper

My boss could not trust me and believes that I don't have integrity, which is not true, but I can't prove it.

student-686

Casper

No, I wouldn't forbid the poor child from being friends with the rich one, because that would mean that anyone that is richer than you can't be yior friend and thats not have life works.

student-696

Casper

No, it is not right for him to adopt the puppy, because at this point, we are unsure who the puppy truly belongs to. From the perspective of the stranger, I could see why he feels protective over the puppy since he saved it, and he may feel like the owner doesn't care about it because they left it in the middle of the road. However, from the perspective of the potential owner, they might be very distraught and worried if they never found their puppy. Therefore, I'd say it's not right.

student-77

Casper

This is a difficult situation. On the one hand, Jennifer really enjoys these books and would love to share that with others. But on the other, books from these times do not ever center around homosexual relationships and it is making her friend Heather feel bad about herself. In my opinion, Jennifer should not form the club, or should make it more inclusive to LGBTQ+ stdents as Heather's feelings take precedence over Jennifer's interest since she can find joy without forming the club.

student-544

Casper

At my job at the recreation centre, I had to assist a patron who was new to Canada, did not speak English, but wanted to learn more about working out. I first asked him about what kind go exercises he wanted to do, and what his goals for himself was. It was difficult as I had to communicate across language barriers and he was not able to communicate his goals. There was nobody around to translate so I had to use google translate, but I wanted to give him the best help possible. I showed him workout and machines an

student-480

Casper

My interpretation of this quote is that as a professional it is important to remain calm in situations in which you do not know tehha answer to or know how to handle. As a professional, you are consistently facing novel situations, though simply \"acting like what you know what you are doing\" may help you in understanding the issue at hand in a logical and thoughtful manner rather than freaking out. In interactions with patients, this may cause the patient to undergo stress. However, if you do not know what you are doing, it is important to ask colleagues for advice and take on professional learning opportunities to learn as it is not safe to assume things expsceially when someone's well-being is in concern (do no harm).

student-299

Casper

This is a difficult situation as Jennifer is excited to start a new club as she is passionate about old romantic novels, however Heather is uncomfortable with Jennifer starting this club as it is not LGBTQ inclusive. I belive that Jennifer should still follow her goals and start the club of old romantic novels, however she should ensure that it is more inclusive as romance is a broad spectrum that can include the LGBTQ community. I would advise her to make Heather an executive member of the club and ask her to recommend and introduce books that are based on LGBTQ romance. In this way, inclusivity is formed and the two friends can bond over their love of novels.

student-243

Casper

No, that would be morally incorrect. Yes, his daughter donated a generous sum on money to the hospital; however, she did it own of her own desire. It is important to respect everyone equally regardless of exterior factors such as donation especially in a professional healthcare setting. All human lives are fundamentally equally. Hospital should aim to approach every case in an equitable fashion and unbiased - these are important in professional practice. treating a patient differently based onwhether they have donated or not would violate justice, fairness, and non-discrimination

student-71

Casper

No. I belive that instilling equity into a child's life is important. I would educate my child on the I'm[oratcne of realizing differences in financial status, social status and work status, however, deep inside we are all individuals and we all feel the same emotions and similar interests in life. If my 'poor' child had the same interests as the 'rich' one and enjoyed spending time with him for who he is and not what he owns, i would be a very proud parent.

student-192

Casper

Firstly, I would check with the company if there are any legal policies on how to go about this. If there were, I would ensure those were followed. As well, I would announce the news in a way that is clear, empathetic and provides distinct next steps. The best way to do this would be to use a clear email that provided this information in a very clear manner. I would include a video in the email where I expressed what happened, and I would make myself available to answer questions as well.

student-102

Casper

As the supervisor, my priority would be addressing the situation in a manner that's respectful to both my employee and the customer. I would first approach and ask what is going on to get a better understanding of the situation. I would then ask my employee to take a break in the staff room while I address the customer's concerns. I'd apologize on behalf of my employee and take the time to address this customer's concerns so that they nad other customers in the store nearbyfeel comfortable returning to our grocery store in the future.

student-155

Casper

Parking is typically more expensive in areas where they know that more money can be made and the targeted audience is more willing to pay for this. Higher parking keeps a large portion of people out. This in turn makes sure there is no overcrowding/traffic and such. However, I do see how this can seem discriminatory of people that are not able to afford it.

student-374

Casper

I would not immediately speak up but ask lucas to meet me after the meeting and talk about his reasoning behind this action. I would approach him non-judgementally and non-confrontationally about why he took my idea and presented as his own. depending on his answer and him being aware of how wrong his action was, I would suggest him to tell the manager about his mistake. If he does not agree, i would tell him that his action was unethical and I would talk with the manager about his actions.

student-469

Casper

My main concern is the wellbeing of my coworkers, while also maintaining a good relationship with them. I want to ensure that my coworkers are in a space where they are treated with respect.

student-422

Casper

Hospitals have a duty to treat all patients according to the type of care that they require. In emergency room settings, this is typically done through a triage process where more urgent patients are seen first and less urgent patients are seen less quickly. In this case, there may be some implied pressure on the hospital team to treat the father differently due to the size of the recent donation. However, when charity is given freely, it is generally without the implication of preferential treatment and it would be unfair to the other patients to provide the father with preferential care, as it may take away from their own treatment. This goes along with the medical ethical principle of justice.

student-55

Casper

I was in highschool and my mom had asked me to come straight home afterschool to help with chores. I was invited to go to eat with friends and forgot about my promis to my mom that evening. When I got home I realied my mistake and began by listening to her and validating her feelings. Then I tried to explain the situation and how it was not intentional. From there, I started using an adgenda on my phone with reminders of where I need to go. This helped with no longer forgetting commitments in the future and I have not had the same instance since.

student-291

Casper

student-117

Casper

He must consider multiple factors, such as the salary, the hours, the benefits of the job. If it would lead to him raising a family. If there are other jobs that have similar perks that would accommodate his extraverted personality and his passion for waorkign with others. If he really is set on being a math teacher however i wouldn't stop him from pursing his dream because i wouldn't want someone to do that to me. I also need to make him aware if he really likes the act of teahcering, or if his main goal is to help others. If he doesn't tliek the act of teaching maybe math tacher isn't for him

student-484

Casper

If I confirm that they were absuing the cat I would approach them and take the cat away. I would ensure that they recgonzie how ehtically corrupt their behavirou was but say it in a calm tone to improve the chance that they listen. I would give them a chance to improve their mroal cahracter by not informign authroities or their parents so that they are not immediately labeled as abusers.

student-224

Casper

There can be several different reasons, but I will only understand better if I speak to him privately in a calm, kind and non-confrontational manner to get more info and listen to his perspective more clearly. I want to know why he thinks the players are performing bad, what other options are there, etc.

student-232

Casper

I would pull my supervisor aside to have a private conversation. It appears that they are intoxicated, but that may not be the case- I would describe what I saw to make me think they were intoxicated and ask if that is what is going on. If they say that are not intoxicated, I would remind them how others may view our actions and that we need to maintain professionalism in the clinic to ensure trust from our patients and give them a comfortable environment to receive care.

student-342

Casper

I understand how this would be very frustrating game to the residents with dementia, however, I do not think it is fair to the other people or really to their success that I mess with the points. I would try and support them through the game, potentially giving them reminders of the rules or offering hints but I would try to keep the game fair. Ultimately I think that people with dementia still deserve to be treated fairly and with autonomy.

student-51

Casper

Since I just started the job, this puts me in a difficult position because I definitely want to foster a positive work environment and make friends, however, i also want to uphold my integrity and be honest. So, I would feel the need to say in a nonaccusatory way, something along the lines of \"oh, i thought I might have saw you accidentally bump into the tv, but I might be wrong.\" And this is the truth. Maybe i wasn't paying attention, or maybe the lighting or angle made it look like they bumped into the tv but didn't. So, I would not want to falsely accuse my coworker

student-276

Casper

Although I can understand that many topics may feel irrelevant to us in the future, I also believe that they are there for good reason. For example, not all students are interested in math-related fields; some may be more interested in history. Since in high school, not everyone knows what they want to pursue as a career, I believe that exposing us to a variety of subjects was not \"useless\" since it may help guide us towards what we really want to do. On the other hand, I see that there are also may topics that may be outdated and not used regardless of the field one pursues. For example, I had spent two weeks in math class learning how to draw parallel lines using two rulers. I believe that this time could have been better spent since computers are more involved nowadays and so this technique may no longer be used. Overall, I believe that it's beneficial to be exposed to many subjects, but I believe that revising the curriculum to save time or ensure that what students are learning is relevant is just as important.

student-134

Casper

I believe that standing up to authority is a very complex phenomenon and has many different perspective to consider. When it comes to making it \"easier\", I believe that providing training on perhaps the resources one could access, or the steps to how someone could do it can make the process feel more coherent. However, standing up to authority is inveitably a difficult task that takes a lot of courage, regardless of training. Training can improve its accessibility.

student-242

Casper

The first thing I would feel is sympathy for the homeless individual, while I understand that the manager may have had previous eperience and reasons for kicking this customer out, I would feel concern if they are innocent and are being treated unfairly. Therefore, my concerns at the moment is making sure that this homeless individual is being treated justly, gaining more information about the situation, and my professional obligation to adhere to my supervisor's wishes and a consideration of their perspective.

student-147

Casper

I would first approach the customer and explain my position as the manager. While ensuring I refrain from coming off as accusatory, I would ask what the issue is in order to try to gather more context. In addition, I would take the employee in private to first ensure they are ok both emotionally and physically. I would then try to hear their side of the story. Lastly, I would report the incident down.

student-357

Casper

Michelle is going through a rough time, and she has a very real motivator to try to win this competition unethically. However, her actions are still wrong. I would initially approach Michelle and tell her how her actions are wrong. This is a national competition and taking these drugs not only puts other who have been naturally training at a disadvantage, but they also risk Michelle's own health. I would ask Michelle to withdraw from the competition or to stop taking the drugs well ahead of time before the competition. I will tell her that if she does not do this and participate fairly, I will report her. I would suggest other competitions and ways she could make the money to help her mother. If she does not step up on her own, I would report her.

student-259

Casper

Kevin should approach the employee without being judgmental. He should discuss the missing bread and should explain the impact it may have on the grocery store, especially if it is a small business. He should ask questions about the situation the employee is in and should ask why he is stealing bread. When learning about the fact that his family is starving, Kevin could offer something, like a salary increase so that he doesn't feel the need to steal bread anymore.

student-396

Casper

some people might think that it can be a waste of time just sitting instead of doing somework. without the knowledge of what benefits it may have or even tryong it out one may not know.

student-548

Casper

Littering with mal-intent is a behaviour that represent a lack of respect for the environment and those around you. I would want to approach the individual in an open, non-confrontaitonal manner, and ask them why it is that they have littered. It oculd be the case that they put the trash down momentarily to do something and intend to pick it up, or they may not be from the area, and may not understand our littering laws. If they had the intention of leaving it there I would inform them of the negative consequences this may have on the environment, the wildlife in the park, and for the other people who want to enjoy the park.

student-202

Casper

I think I would find it understandably difficult to cope with this new stress. I would take a minute to cope with my experience before moving on. I would make sure that I don't overthink and begin to panic and try to leave the feeling for later and try to best rationally deal with the situation at the moment. I would place an emphasis on what I am capable of doing and the

student-215

Casper

As a person who works closely with dementia patients. I have once helped them to clean up which was not part of my job. However, the PSWs were busy at the time and did not want to attend to the patient at the time. Seeing that this patient was in discomfort and could not join the activities until he was cleaned up, I assisted him

student-622

Casper

I believe that proper training can make it easier to stand up to authority. You can be taught what words and phrases are important to hit a cord with authority so that they will listen to you. If you feel like you need to stand up to authority, you should know how to do it in a correct manner that is non confrontational and you will be listened to.

student-524

Casper

Seeing the bruises arises the concern of potential abuse of the patient. However, Ashley should not jump to conclusions. Ashley should aim to gather information by talking to the PSW and the patient. Ashley can ask the PSW why they yelled at the patient. However, given that Ashley is not a physician, the PSW may not be able to disclose full details regarding the patient that would support or disprove potential abuse. Therefore, Ashley should report that they examined that the patient was bruised to ensure the nursing home is aware and able to examine further into the causes. However, Ashley should be cautious about framing the issue in a biased manner that assumes any malpractice by the PSW or abuse generally. Ashley should entrust the nursing home leadership to assess.

student-137

Casper

Standing up to authorities can be extremely intimidating, so I think this is an area of development that should be emphasized and discussed more, especially given its long historical impact. For example, world war 2 and the psychology conformity experiments, we know that people tend to obey authority figures, even when the behaviours go against their moral values. So, targeting this area should be the focus of a new social initiative.

student-670

Casper

Parking si expensive in these areas likely because the people who set the price understand that the people who live in these expensive neighbourhood can afford to pay more for things such as parking, and that the price will not be heavily contested by those people. It could also be a detterant not just for people of low socio-economic income but for people in general, as increasing the price will limit the total amount of people willing to visit places such as parks and other activities. This creates a less crowded and more enjoyable experience for those who are willing to pay. Likely it is also set in place to prevent people from lower SES backgrounds to utilize these activities, however this claim cannot be made without evidence garnered first.

student-239

Casper

I would approach Amy in a kind and apologetic manner. Personally, as I am a manager, I would take immediate responsibility for my forgetfulness and congratulate her on the award. I would also take this time to address any tensions which have existed between us in the past and apologize for those as well, as I am the person in \"higher power\". I would ensure her that I did not purposely forget the award due to our past conflicts, and offer to settle our differences and have a clean slate.

student-48

Casper

The main issue is that my grandma is feeling lonely, but I have finals. In this situation, there are multiple options. I could spend time with my grandma and not study for finals, I could study for finals but not spend time with my grandma, or I could reschedule with grandma and talk to her about my final exams. If I could, I would tell grandma that I can meet her after my final exams due to the time-sensitive nature. If she still feels lonely for the time being, I would ask someone to check in on my grandma or maybe even spend some time talking to her over FaceTime as an alternative. Ultimately, that would be the best solution so that grandma does not feel lonely and I do not sacrfice time on my finals.

student-81

Casper

As the family doctor, I'd want to prioritize maintaining a positive relationship with my patient Hazel while also upholding my responsibilities to the academic institution and my clinic. I'd first take the time to speak to Hazel about why she feels like she is sick or what circumstance are influencing her decision to want to miss the exam. As someone who has been a student myself, I'd want to valdiate the frustration that Hazel might be feeling towards this exam but also let her know that I cannot write a note without evidence to support my comments and inform her of my moral and legal responsibilities to be honest as a physician working for this clinic. I'd also reiterate that this isn't fair to the other students at the university and intead encourage her to seek academic guidance at her institution, tutoring services, or support form friends.

student-184

Casper

First I would ask him whether he was smoking it for medicinal needs. If not, I would confirm that what he is smoking is marijuana indeed and if it is, confirm his legal age. Then I would ask him whether he knew it was not allowed on school premises despite the fact that it is illegal. After gathering all relevant information I would want to make a decision in keeping with the well-being of my schoolmates along with respecting the privacy and maintaining the confidentiality of this individual. If he was unaware or it was his first time then I would let ask him to let the authorities know and explain the situation regardless in alignment with school policies. If he shows no remorse for his actions then I would have to report it to my school authorities.

student-466

Casper

I would first consider that she is grieving over the loss of her relationship and that can be hard on her mental health. I would ask her how she's doing, whether she's staying healthy within her house, and what I can do to support her. I would ask if she would be willing to go outside with me as well so that she can stay healthy. If she is unwilling to leave her house, i would ask if i could visit instead to provide her support. If she is willing to go outside, we could do the things she likes to do so that she can enjoy her time. Either way, if she is still feeling sad beyond a point I can help with, i would prompt her to seek professional help and give her mental health resources.

student-324

Casper

Richard should not tell Jessica about the database. While I understand Jessica is struggling, and the database will definitely help her in the short-term, as her friend he should not tell her because it will prevent her from learning how to actually do chemistry. This will harm Jessica in the long-run, especially if she pursues further science education. However, instead I would encourage Richard to offer Jessica support in another way, such as peer-tutoring her, or providing her with other helpful resources.

student-44

Casper

I would first kindly ask if the person took my book or saw the book that I left on the table earlier. I wouldn't jump to any conclusions about theft, because its entirely plausible that the person thought the book was theirs, or maybe they took it to return it to me.

student-20

Casper

J'essaierais d'arrêter mon ami de regarder le téléphone de l'hôte, étant donné qu'il s'agit de quelque chose de privé. Toutefois, s'il a obtenu sa permission avant, il s'agit d'une situation différente étant donné que l'hôte a déjà donné son consentement.

student-632

Casper

I would be tempted to purchase the test bank, however I would not purchase it. I want to learn the material on my own. Purchasing the test bank would not be an effective strategy for me to master the material and may only provide a temporary band aid for my grades. I may need this material in another course or in an exam or other in-class acitivities that the test bank does have answers for. In those cases, I really need to understand the material on my own. Instead, I would reach out to my professor for help, attend tutoring sessions, reach out to classmates, and. rethink my study strategies to master the material on my own

student-115

Casper

If I saw that my friend was visibily uncomfortable, I would first ask them if they want me to say something on their behalf, as I do not want to speak for them if they do not wish to me spoken for. If consented, I would ask the person who took the video if they could kindly delete the video as my friend does not want to me in it. I would ask the person in a respectful way to understand why we wish for it to be deleted.

student-266

Casper

I do agree with this statement. Unfortunately, there is an opportunity cost to every choice we make. Sometimes, some choices must be made, but these choices also involve giving up other things.

student-708

Casper

I would not forbid my child from being friends with another due to our financial status, instead I would offer support and explanations to my child as to why our situation is the way that it is, and how his friend may be fortunate to have those toys, but it doesn't mean that we love our child any less. It would be unfair to him to lose a friend becasue of our finances.

student-510

Casper

This would greatly concern me as respect for historical sites are important. but i will request to talk to them privately, away from the crowd. I am hoping they agree. Then i would calmly voice my concern. I will then listen attentively to what they have to say, hoping the situaiton geets resolved from this

student-566

Casper

In this case the intervation of a proffesion is necessary as the wellbieng of the animal and the house owned is hte most importat. THat being the case it has to be taken into account that the economical conditions of the home ownes could be affected by the predense of this animals. If the animals were there often I would propse to create a fund that would help the house owners for a low price. If it is not frequent at all getting a proffesional form afar would be necessary. Either way it is always important to take care of the animals and the people and a price should not be in the way of someones wellbeing.

student-84

Casper

this is diffcult situation and in this situation there are pros and cons for stop charging for electricity,. the pros are that it will allow people to get healthy nutrition as well as help with basic literacy skills by able to to read on the internet without concern for finances. the cons are that it can allows for overuse of electricity if there is no charge and can hurt the countrys economy and the supply. in this situation, there should be an alternative which is to decide based on the family financial status such as low families income should not be charged as much for electricity so that they can satisfy their basic needs, while higher income brackets familties should continue to pay for electricity so it wont allwo for oversue.

student-517

Casper

Firstly I would have pull the student aside and have a private conversation with them in a setting that they would feel comfortable in. I would give them the opportunity to explain themselves as they have been tardy and left early on multiple occasions. As a student myself, I would gather more information on them maybe having alternate responsibilities such as taking care of a family member or work. However, I would give them to opportunity to speak to the teacher as they did not provide enough support to this project. If they do not report themselves to the teacher then I would have to speak to other group members and figure out a comprehensive solution such as moving forward as a group to report this student after giving them an opportunity to do so.

student-128

Casper

My friend of 5 years impressed upon me a situation where they were cheating during a University exam. They promised me not to discuss this in fear of failing out of the course and potentially out of University. I strongly advised this individual that cheating violates academic integrity and for them to own up to their cheating. I told them that I would be there for them despite these consequences, and elected to discuss it with my professor, violating my promise. I empathized with their situation and told them that though I violated this promise and potentially ruined their career, I believed that academic honesty trumps even our friendship.

student-178

Casper

D'un côté, je comprends que mon collègue ne veut surement rien faire de mal, et quil pourrait peut etre juste vouloir samuser. cependant, connaissant mon autre collegue et sachant quil ne prend pas ces genres de blagues d'une bonne manière, je serais concernée par l'effet que cette blague pourrait avoir sur leur relation, puis sur l'atmosphère au bureau.

student-93

Casper

I understand that John is in a difficult situation. He likely wants to help the elderly lady, given that she has an important appointment to attend, which has to do with her health. However, John does not want to get in trouble by letting the lady onto the bus without paying. In this case, I suggest that John orders the elderly lady an Uber or taxi so that the elderly lady can make it to her appointment. This costs more money than a bus, but the elderly lady could pay John back at a later time. If neither of them can afford an Uber/taxi, perhaps one of them has a friend who can offer the elderly lady a ride. Since the appointment is urgent, it is likely not possible to reschedule.

student-63

Casper

Whilst I can understand why Richard may want to tell Jessica about the database, in order to help her out, it would not be an appropriate thing to do. By providing Jessica the data base it provides her with an unfair advantage over other students who may not have access and may also be struggling with the course. Furthermore providing the database to Jessica also disadvantages her as she may properly learn the content which could create problems with more advanced units later in her degree. Richar should instead offer to tutor Jessica or encourage her to raise her concerns with the lecturer

student-355

Casper

Determining whether or not this policy is discrimination comes down to the specifics of the policy itself. Close consideration of the specific outline of the store policy should determine whether or not the actual policy is harming any parties involved. Does it prevent students from exercising any of the rights they should be granted? Does it harm community members that may not attend the school but are still within the age range of prohibited shoppers? If indeed there are parties being harmed in any way by this policy, such in the event that a student must purchase an item during school hours but is not allowed to, this policy may in fact be unethical and there could be grounds for establishing this policy as discriminatory.

student-107

Casper

As Jennifer, my main concern is the wellbeing of Heather and to put together a club that Jennifer is passionate about. I think Jennifer should have a private, non-confrontational discussion with Heather, outlining the goal of the club is bring together people who enjoy Old Romantic Books (ex. writing, timeline, etc.), and not to put down LGBTQ+ members. If possible, Jennifer can include books in that era that are also LGBTQ+ friendly to help make Heather feel more welcome.

student-654

Casper

This is a difficult situation as i would not want to be late to my exam, which could potentially result in losing time on the exam, or not being able to write the exam all together. However, parking there might result in a ticket which is expensive and could be a financial concern for me. I understand that parking in an illegal spot is immoral and these policies are in place for important reasons. Ultimately I would keep driving around to find a legal parking spot for me. I might have to run into the exam in order to make it, but hopefully if i explain my situation to my professor they would be able to take my persceptive and be empathetic of my situation.

student-426

Casper

James must be feeling a lot of pressure as the head couch and want what is best for the team, which in his eyes is winning. He likely is just trying to make the team as successful as possible in the only way he know how.

student-490

Casper

This is a difficult situation for John as he may feel a conflict between his responsibility to his job and what he may feel morally to do. On one hand, it is understandable that one may want to \"make an exception\" to the rules for the case of this kind elderly lady who is rushing to an urgent appointment, as there is empathy for her situation. On the other hand, in his role, John has a responsibility to uphold the regulations of this employer requiring all to pay a bus fair. In this situation, it is important that John upholds the responsibilities and rules of his job - but to enforce them in a way that listens to the lady's concerns. He should tell her that he understands he predicament, and that he is sorry for the difficult position this puts her, but that he must follow the regulations of his employer, for fairness to them and also to the other passengers on the bus. He may also then suggest alternative methods of obtaining a ticket, for instance if there is anyone close by or anyone she could call for a ticket, or if there is any other way to get her to her destination.

student-1

Casper

It would not be a religious discrimination for a store to not offer because the store may only supply certain things. for example if it wasn't a food store it wouldn't purposely not have pasta to discriminate a religion.

student-671

Casper

It depends. How great are the risks associated with the procedure? Governments and Helath organizations should be discussing the procedure, while taking religion into consideration. The risks may be greater for having the procedure done, but how much greater? It is possible that the risks are so low that it does not pose a significant health risk to individual, in which case, it seems reasonable to allow the procedure.

student-394

Interview

To start off, I would immediately acknowledge the owner's and customer's complaint over the subpar quality of the food. The rationale behind my first action is to hold myself and our team accountable. After acknowledging and addressing the problem, I would speak with the two employees about our performance and how we could improve our cooking techniques. I feel that reprimanding the two underage employees is unnecessary due to the potential impact on morale and their trust in me as a manager. Additionally, I would need to gather information from my team as to why they could not cook the meals properly - was it due to how busy they were, are we currently understaffed during a lunch rush, or did I not train them properly on how to cook a burger? To conclude, I would first apologize to our franchisee on our subpar quality for the last 30 minutes. Then I would inform and retrain my staff or make adjustments to better accommodate our workload.

student-717

Interview

Physicians are very important in their role of educating the general public about topics in healthcare. This was very evident during the COVID-19 pandemic when there was a lot of misinformation being spread and many people were misinformed about the virus, vaccines, and healthcare in general. There is so much misinformation on the Internet that spreads quickly. I believe physicians are a vital resource and tool for educating the general public about healthcare topics. This is especially true when physicians can make evidence-based claims using research, either their own or others'. Physicians are specifically trained in healthcare, learning anatomy, physiology, biochemistry and other fundamental medical sciences. I think it's a very important role for physicians to use their position and knowledge to educate the general public. If some people don't believe or understand them, it's important to provide information in words a general audience can understand, whether they have medical education or not. Physicians should explain details and provide evidence about healthcare topics using language everyone can grasp. Sometimes, unfortunately, people have preconceptions and don't believe what physicians say. As a physician, it's important to aim to give a lot of information to provide that healthcare resource to people. It's up to them whether they accept and understand that information. Even with strong evidence, some may not want to believe the same thing. That's okay. I think a physician's role stops there - you can give education, guidance and resources but never force someone to believe as you do. Overall, I believe educating the general public about healthcare topics is a vital role for physicians.

student-715

Interview

I don't believe reaching a certain age alone is reason enough to require someone to give up driving. Doing so restricts their freedom and autonomy which can negatively impact the patient-provider relationship. As a prospective healthcare provider, I aim to treat people equally regardless of age, gender or other factors. This perspective comes in part from an experience I had volunteering at a family medicine clinic. An elderly patient in his 80s came in with his adult son. My fellow volunteer, who was around my age, spoke only to the son as if the elderly man couldn't express himself. I could see the change in the elderly man's demeanor as he apparently felt dismissed and limited. This illustrated to me that we shouldn't make assumptions about capabilities based solely on advanced age. Where do we draw the line about being too old or too young? Imposing restrictions due to age alone can lead to inequalities. I strive to avoid discrimination and value each individual while providing care.

student-778

Interview

In this airplane scenario, my first approach would be to politely communicate with the parent and see if they could possibly switch seats with their screaming baby. If that doesn't work, I would offer to change my own seat as an alternative solution. This reminds me of a time during clinical experience when an elderly male patient was giving the receptionists a hard time about long wait times. Since the providers were very busy, I stepped out of my comfort zone as a volunteer with no patient experience and approached the man myself to try and calm the situation. I engaged him in civil conversation, acknowledged his frustration, and asked some questions about his concerns. Though initially still upset, he soon relaxed and we were able to connect on a human level. By the time providers were available, he had completely calmed down and thanked me as he left. Similarly here, though screaming babies can be grating, I would empathize with the stressed parent. If the noise became too much, I would politely communicate and try to find a mutually agreeable solution, whether that's them moving or me switching seats. The priority is addressing the issue compassionately through open communication and perspective taking.

student-787

Interview

First, I would have an open conversation with my friend Brian to understand how he feels about the situation. I would express empathy and sympathize with his disappointment. However, I would reassure him that not being selected for the Olympic Team likely relates to the committee's criteria, not his abilities as an athlete. This should not negatively impact Brian's self-image or aspirations. The Paralympic Games are coming up in two weeks - he needs to stay focused on preparing and feeling motivated to perform at his best. We can't let this detract from his upcoming competition. My role as Brian's friend is to listen supportively, then instill excitement and a positive attitude about the Paralympic opportunity ahead. He is still an elite athlete with a major games ready to commence. My message will be one of empathy but emphasizing perseverance and the future possibilities.

student-784

Interview

This is a difficult situation that requires considering multiple perspectives - that of the physician dating their patient, the patient themselves, and my own role and duty in this situation. As the patient's physician, they likely see them as a trustworthy source of care. However, physician-patient relationships have an inherent power imbalance, as physicians hold greater medical knowledge, which can unduly influence patients' decisions. This could lead to the physician not prioritizing evidence-based care with this particular patient. As this represents a conflict of interest, it raises ethical concerns regarding patient care at the clinic. Having recognized this issue, I have a duty to address it professionally and calmly, not making any rash judgments. I should initiate a discussion with the physician to outline my observations non-accusatorily. Framing this as a legal and risk mitigation issue may make it easier to convey. Emphasizing our shared commitment to patients' wellbeing is paramount. An alternative could be transferring the patient's care to me, allowing continuity while eliminating the conflict of interest. With trust between us, they may agree this is best. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-827

Interview

If I've been given responsibility to mediate a conflict between two people in the next room, I would first gather as much information as possible about the situation from both parties. I would make sure to listen closely to each side with compassion, empathy, and an aim to understand both perspectives. I would then ask each party to communicate their ideal solution or outcome. My goal would be finding common ground where neither is harmed and both gain what's most important to them. While I know this isn't always possible, adequate communication and understanding could get us there. As the mediator, I could facilitate this by providing a balanced perspective and allowing each side to fully voice their ideas without interruption, coming from a place of empathy. With this understanding approach, I believe some mutual understanding could be reached.

student-763

Interview

The issue is that without participants, we won't obtain reliable vaccine results. However, that doesn't mean I or anyone should hastily take an unproven vaccine just because I'm an administrator. I would need to review policies to ethically proceed. Has this vaccine been through animal trials and shown safe for human testing? If not, I would not take it or administer it to others, as that could cause harm. However, if it has successfully passed initial safety studies, we would need to enroll participants in clinical trials under careful oversight. I could enroll myself to ethically test the vaccine's effects, but would not take an untested vaccine randomly. My role is ensuring we follow rigorous scientific protocols to safely develop and evaluate this vaccine prior to any deployment.

student-736

Interview

My understanding of activism is grassroots movements driven by communities to advocate for policies and programs that positively impact people's lives. I believe physicians and medical students have a role in this duty. As community leaders directly affecting health, doctors can influence public health so patients are cared for beyond the clinic. I understand the challenges. With the demands of staying current on medicine, taking on activism requires great commitment and emotional investment. However, much health progress has resulted directly or indirectly from activism - like reproductive justice advocacy. This promotes not just healthy pregnancies or safe child rearing, but reproductive choice including contraceptive and healthcare access. One way medical students and doctors can engage in activism is advocating for increased access to contraceptives and reproductive healthcare. They can also start public health initiatives to improve sex education, so teenagers gain better understanding of safe sex, changes to their bodies, and reproductive health. Physicians can play a vital role in launching programs to ensure patients get care and knowledge to advocate for themselves. While difficult, activism allows doctors to create positive change beyond treating individuals.

student-738

Interview

All right, so the question is, if I was on the admissions committee, what would be the most important thing I would look for in a candidate? I think the most important attribute to become a doctor is actually empathy. So I will really want to look for an empathic person because if people are not empathetic and they become doctors, then patients can be really upset, they can be angry towards the physician and the physician just won't understand what's going on. Also, if they don't deliver news in an empathic manner or if they don't feel for the patient, then I think it can really damage the trust relationship that the patient has with the physician and overall just damage the patient's treatment. I also think that a doctor's job is to do the most good and the least harm. And if they're not empathetic, then I think it would eventually just hurt the patient more than do good because they won't feel respected, they won't feel like their feelings matter, they won't feel like their feelings are taken into consideration and they'll just feel like an object to the physician. So I think that's really important. I would also look for candidates who have good communication skills because I think it's important for a doctor to be able to communicate clearly and also simply what the diagnosis is so that the patient understands exactly what he will be going through. So yes, I think those are two very important factors. Also, I think one of the most important things is to be motivated to become a doctor. Because I think that if future physicians don't want to go into medicine and they're only forced to by their parents or they feel social pressure, then I think it can actually be really harmful to the patients and society in general, because physicians, like I said before, have to be empathetic, have to have good communication. But they also need to want to do this because this is a very stressful, I think, job, and it requires a lot of dedication and a lot of university time. And I think that if you're not motivated enough, it will actually make you become a more frustrated person. And no patient likes a frustrated doctor because it's easy for a patient to know when the doctor is actually annoyed with you or disrespects you or does not value you. So I think if you don't want to go into medicine, then it's probably the worst career path you could take if you're not sure of what you want to do because there are so many important things to look for before being a doctor. That's pretty much it. But I would also never neglect anyone in the admissions process because I think that everyone has their own skill set to show and to put forward. And even though I said what I thought were the most important attributes, I would also consider many others. And I would also let the interviewees surprise me. And if I find something that I find particularly interesting or a characteristic trait of a person that I think would make a good doctor, then I would not hesitate to take that person into the university.

student-799

Interview

I can share an experience when I was working at a nursing home during the pandemic and facilitating visits between residents and their families. To give a bit more context, I started in the summer of 2020 working at this nursing home. At the time we had just started to open up visits between residents and their families, but all of the visits were outside and they needed to maintain physical distancing. The schedule for the visits was really tightly packed because people hadn't seen their family members in a long time and so there wasn't a ton of time for each visit - I believe they had 30 minutes. Our schedule was pretty much always full because we only had so many spots so that everyone could maintain physical distancing. It was important that I was bringing residents downstairs and outside to their visits on time so that they got the full amount of time with their family members. That was really important to me because it had been so long since they had seen their family and it's really good for their mental wellbeing. I wanted them to be able to have this time. In an effort to ensure that I was on time for the schedule, I would go up early to their rooms and I made sure that I had enough time to bring them down. But the issue was I wasn't trained on any sort of lifts, so if a patient or a resident was in bed or needed to use the bathroom before going down for their visit, I did not have the training to do that and it would have been unsafe if I had attempted to do that. So I had to go and ask a PSW or a nurse to help me get the resident ready to go outside in those cases. Now, this was difficult because sometimes the PSWs were pretty much always very busy. They had a lot of residents and needed to be doing showers or helping with feeding and so on. And so I felt really badly going and asking for help, but again, I could not do it on my own without jeopardizing the safety of the resident. So I went and I would ask them and I had a positive relationship with the PSWs, so they didn't mind helping, but I could tell that they were very overwhelmed and I wanted to make the process a bit easier. What I did was from then on, I would print off a schedule of the visits and bring that to the nurses and PSWs every morning. It would be posted in the nurse's room every morning so that they knew when each resident was going down to their visits and they could prepare when it was most convenient for them. They weren't in the middle of showering a resident when I was trying to find them to toilet another resident. I also asked them for their feedback - was this working for them? It seemed to be working better, but I wanted to make sure that I was integrating feedback from them. They actually asked me, after their shift change in the afternoon, if I could come up and just give them a rundown of the afternoon visit schedule, which I was happy to do, and that let things run a lot smoother. It also let me get all of the residents down safely to their visits and in a timely manner so they could have that time with their families. It built my relationship and a positive relationship with the PSWs and nurses because I think they understood that I respected their time and I could see that they were very busy. Although I needed their help, I think that they felt respected in the process. I also made sure that I was helping them in return. I didn't want to just be taking and asking them for help. I wanted to ease their burden as well. So I would help them with feeding at meal times and with the snack cart. I would spend time with residents who took a bit more of their time attention wise and just help them out in those ways. I think that's really important in a future career as a physician, because I'm not going to have all of the answers, depending on my specialty. There's going to be times where I'm going to need help from other physicians, from other specialties, and I'll need help from other members of the healthcare team in order to optimize patient outcomes. I want to ensure that although I need help, I am not just taking from others and I'm also contributing to this healthcare team and communicating with them in order to come to the best solution for our patients.

student-802

Interview

Today I'm asked a question - in my clerkship, I coincidentally am placed with my best friend. My best friend is continuing to share stories about their patients, calling them by their name and sharing details about their condition as well as their behavior. I'm asked what ethical issues I can foresee arising from this situation. I think right off the bat, the first thing that came to my mind was patient confidentiality. As a physician, you have a responsibility to keep patient information confidential, especially with the public. Another issue I can foresee happening is creating bias in myself. Because we are in the same clerkship and ward, I can foresee myself caring for some of these same patients. Knowing their name, condition, and behavior from my friend's stories might influence my own perceptions and biases before ever interacting with them myself and being able to form my own opinions with an open perspective. The last issue is jeopardizing trust and the workplace environment. If anyone were to find out, this could jeopardize trust not only between my friend and their patient, but also among colleagues and staff. Conversations can be misconstrued as gossip or rumors which can really affect workplace morale. As we're just starting out, we want to make good impressions and really practice those ethical standards we preach. So I can foresee that causing mistrust. However, I think it's important to communicate with staff and have opportunities to debrief and discuss cases, whether with friends and family. But there are ways to do that while respecting confidentiality. In my experience on a suicide hotline, those conversations were incredibly emotional and taxing. Without being able to discuss those feelings with other volunteers, it would have been very challenging to continue. So I think it's understandable to have these conversations and debrief cases with colleagues, but to do so without giving specific patient names or conditions so it remains confidential. I would encourage my friend to reframe the conversation to how they were feeling or if they wanted general medical advice rather than specifics about the patient. As an aspiring physician, collaboration is important to get perspectives on challenging cases, debrief, and take care of our mental health. Diverse perspectives can help patient care too. Perhaps my friend was misreading a situation and I could give a better outlook for them to go back with empathy and provide better care. So collaboration is essential but confidential.

student-808

Interview

In this situation, it's important to recognize that both participants are looking to win, yet there can only be one winner - which poses a big issue since the applicants appear equally strong. However, gathering more information about each project could reveal differences. For example, they may have different motivations or thought processes behind their projects. Although the content seems equally good, the reasoning and potential impact could differentiate the two. Furthermore, if one project is more organized or addresses a more recent problem, it may be better to choose that one since it is more current. Even if the presentations themselves are equal in the judges' eyes, exploring the projects more deeply could reveal compelling reasons to choose one over the other.

student-761

Interview

Thank you for your question. My responsibility here remains maintaining a positive relationship with the patient and family. If this reflects on my general behavior, it could also impact coworkers and other patients. To understand the situation better, I would first approach the patient, as they are my primary concern. In a comfortable, non-confrontational setting, I would gauge how they've been feeling and if anything is bothering them about treatment or my bedside manner. I would open a conversation to discuss any concerns and assure them I welcome feedback to provide the best care possible. If the patient seems willing to talk, it would be a good opportunity to take any feedback, reflect on it, and apply strategies to better support them. I would also speak to my supervisor to understand the full situation before approaching the family, so I have information on both sides. Again, it would be a private, non-judgmental way to make them feel comfortable explaining their concerns. I want to gain feedback on how I could improve and better support their family. If I can easily fix something that would benefit the situation, I will reflect and try to implement their suggestions to support them through this open conversation. I would also gauge any underlying biases occurring on both sides, like cultural or religious differences I'm not considering, or my own biases against patients - an important self-reflection for any physician. While doing so, I might better understand the family's biases regarding my race, ethnicity, gender, etc. that impact how I implement their feedback. Most importantly, my job is ensuring patient wellbeing. I would encourage and welcome their suggestions and feedback. I would also assure them that if our dynamic is not working, I'm happy to refer them to another physician for treatment continuity, as their wellbeing is my priority. If another physician can interact more positively, I would do so. Moving forward, I would also get perspectives from other healthcare professionals.

student-824

Interview

Thank you for sharing this difficult situation. As physicians, we have a responsibility to disclose medical information to patients with decision-making capacity, even if family members object. Before acting, I would first meet privately with the parents to understand their hesitations around disclosure. They may have legitimate concerns about their son's mental health that I should consider. However, I would also explain the importance of respecting the boy's autonomy, given his terminal illness. Assuming he has decision-making capacity, he has a right to direct his own care based on his values. Withholding information could damage our therapeutic relationship and trust. I would offer to assess the boy's capacity and, if appropriate, slowly disclose details to him in a supportive manner. This may alleviate the parents' concerns. I would highlight that shared decision-making between us, the parents and the boy would lead to the best care plan. If after discussion the parents refuse disclosure due to risks like self-harm, I may defer briefly. But the boy's right to direct his care should be paramount, assuming capacity. Over time, I would continue advocating for transparency and autonomy in a compassionate, non-judgmental manner. Respectfully bridging this conflict between parents and patient requires patience and care. My goal is to reach a resolution where the boy receives key information while also addressing family concerns. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-830

Interview

In this complex situation, I would prioritize personal safety while looking out for the homeless individual's wellbeing. Rather than chasing the two girls and risking harm, I would stay with the individual, empathize by asking about their situation and experiences. I would inquire if they've raised this as a concern to authorities and offer assistance in doing so if desired. Providing emotional support and legal guidance within my abilities could help. If the individual wants assistance in reporting this mistreatment, I would help navigate that process with authorities. My focus is avoiding an unsafe confrontation while assisting this mistreated person in finding a constructive resolution. Listening compassionately and advising them on options to address this recurring issue is likely the most prudent course of action.

student-740

Interview

This is a sensitive situation, as public health should be the top priority, yet tracking individuals' movements can impose major privacy risks that make citizens feel exposed. Given these competing concerns, the best approach may be finding alternative public health measures that lower disease spread while respecting privacy. Suggestions already implemented worldwide include masking mandates, vaccination requirements, social distancing, and limits on gatherings. While controversial, dissecting perspectives on why they help can build understanding. Officials can share unbiased data on masks, hygiene and distancing to educate citizens that these measures effectively reduce transmission based on evidence. It's also key to remind the public of the goal - reducing illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths. With limited hospital capacity, surging cases can overburden healthcare workers and restrict care for other emergencies. By informing citizens of these broad implications, they may better comprehend the purpose of safety measures despite privacy tradeoffs. In summary, educating the public with clear evidence-based rationale for interventions can promote informed choices. Citizens may then continue safety practices willingly, knowing the societal benefits, while retaining autonomy over health decisions and minimizing invasive tracking. A thoughtful public health approach requires openness on all sides to find solutions.

student-766

Interview

The prompt is to discuss gambling in the larger sense and its implications for society. There are a lot of pros and cons to gambling. It is seen as a recreational activity - it can bring people together, give them something to do, be a stress reliever, or just fun if you go to a casino or buy a lottery ticket. Those are considered forms of gambling that can be harmless. However, gambling also has significant downsides in that it can become addictive. Once addicted, it is very difficult to break the habit and can impact not just the gambler but their family and friends. It's difficult for addicted gamblers to see when they cross a line. Addiction is an illness that needs to be treated as such. If someone with a gambling problem asks you for money, it's important not to give in right away. You need to convey worry for what they'll do with the money. Remain calm and not argumentative or accusatory - that doesn't help in these situations. Approach delicately. Recommend solutions - say you're coming as a supportive friend who has looked into resources that can help, some form of rehabilitation may be necessary because you want them to avoid further harm. Identify you're trying to help, not control. Ultimately it is their choice to seek help, but your role is to facilitate that discussion and encourage them to reach out. Gambling can have really detrimental impacts - I've heard of people losing homes, affecting family. I don't think the pros ever outweigh the cons. It can become a very harmful habit. I personally don't enjoy gambling, so maybe I'm biased, but I recognize it can be fun and social for some. Organizations that run gambling have a duty to not promote unhealthy behavior and provide resources for those who become addicted. Friends and family have a duty to each other, and the community has a duty. But organizations like OLG have a responsibility to ensure they don't promote unhealthy habits and provide resources for gambling addiction.

student-812

Interview

I think this is a very important question, especially nowadays, when there are a lot of causes that are worth fighting for. I think being a physician or doctor, or any sort of medical degree, puts you in a position of authority and power in today's society. Being a clinician is a pretty well respected profession. A lot of what doctors say has a lot of sway in the public eye just because of the education that doctors go through and the innate feeling of trust that we're supposed to have in medical providers. So I think with that comes a lot of responsibility on ensuring that we are educating the public on matters of importance and ensuring that we are using our voices to make a difference, not just in the lives of clients or patients, but also in the general public. Because of this innate responsibility as medical professionals, we can also reflect back on some of the canons medical practitioners are supposed to follow, one of them being an advocate for patients and for people in your community. I think that medical students and physicians have a really strong role in activism as long as it doesn't conflict with the ability to provide care to patients and doesn't increase disparities between marginalized populations. As long as the activism is for a good cause, I think that we have a role in using our knowledge base. Healthcare providers are part of an interconnected team of specialists, and I think using that network is a very important thing to do. For me personally, I think there's always a place for activism, regardless of what profession you're in. This past summer, I was able to work with a lot of hospital lab employees, not necessarily medical practitioners, but those working in the core labs, working on blood, urine, specimen samples. I was working for a manufacturing research position that was in partnership with Hamilton Health Sciences, and we were able to talk to a lot of employees and get their opinions on their work environment and things that weren't very ergonomic or things that could be improved to help reduce workplace injuries in the future. By giving these employees a voice, we were able to advocate for them and focus our projects on creating a better work environment for them. I think that's a really niche take on activism just because you're not working with a very marginalized population, but you are working with people whose lives could be improved. And I think workers having a say in their work environment is important across the board, regardless of what work condition you're in. I think activism is a really important thing, especially if it shows your commitment to your community. If you are working with a marginalized population, I think if you don't advocate for that population outside of work, it doesn't bring you as close to the population you're caring for as it should. Because physicians tend to be in a position of power, they tend to be higher status just because of the nature of the profession. I think that everyone in those kinds of situations should be advocating for those with less fortunate situations. That's just my take on it.

student-820

Interview

I think that this is a clear scenario of unprofessionalism. As a doctor, I have the patient's best interest at heart and have to follow the principle of beneficence. Although the relationship could be good for the patient, an intimate relationship between a doctor and patient is unprofessional and could impact the patient's care. The patient may be more inclined to follow a certain treatment just because the physician recommended it, which could affect their health outcomes. I would first have a private conversation with my colleague to understand the situation fully. I would not want to jump to conclusions or accuse them of something untrue. In our discussion, I would share my observations and ask questions to learn more, like how long the relationship has lasted, how serious it is, and if they are considering marriage. Based on the answers, I would decide what to do next. There are consequences to my colleague's actions. If it has been a long, serious relationship, I would consult the clinic's ethical policies to see if such relationships are allowed, and under what conditions. If so, I may have the patient switch doctors since it is still unprofessional. Or if they met outside the clinic and plan to marry, perhaps they can continue dating as the policies permit. If it seems more casual, I would encourage my colleague to speak with HR for guidance, and likely end the relationship if HR agrees it is inappropriate. I would follow up to ensure the situation is handled properly, and support my colleague through the process. Ultimately, I cannot make a unilateral decision without considering all factors and clinic policies. But I would aim to address this ethically and professionally.

student-792

Interview

So my understanding of this question is that I'm being asked if it's ethical for a physician to be sexually involved with a patient who initiated or consented to the initial contact. On one hand, I understand that this is a private matter and their personal life shouldn't be scrutinized. However, on the other hand, I think that physicians are in positions of authority, and an intimate relationship can definitely affect patient care. So I think that as a physician, it is their responsibility to really separate their private and personal life from their professional duties. My stance on this would be that if a physician does become sexually involved with a patient, then out of concern for the patient and to maintain quality care, the physician should no longer be their primary caregiver if they want to continue the relationship. However, if they're no longer in a direct patient-physician role and it's no longer a professional relationship, then it could be ethical. As long as the physician is directly caring for the patient, an intimate relationship is not appropriate, because there is an inherent power dynamic that could reduce care quality and be unethical. In medicine, it's not outlandish to imagine situations where physicians need to evaluate how their personal matters and conflicts of interest can negatively impact their provision of quality care. It's really important in these situations for physicians to maintain professionalism, recognize when a personal relationship becomes a conflict of interest, and know when to refrain from actions that could impact their decision-making. Physicians need to be aware of when they should separate their personal and professional lives, or take steps to address any entanglement.

student-713

Interview

This is a difficult situation, as the athlete plans to use prohibited anabolic steroids to train for competition. However, my role as this family's physician is to provide the best care regardless of circumstances. I would first have a private conversation asking what he knows about steroid use - both medically and in terms of athletic consequences. It's important to ensure he fully comprehends the potential long-term health risks that could hinder his quality of life. This conversation can create an open environment for him to ask questions and voice concerns, which I would try to answer or consult a specialist if needed. By establishing this relationship and addressing his questions, I aim to create a space where he knows I want to help. As his longtime physician with knowledge of his history, I would share that I'm willing to continue treating him. If he proceeds with steroids, I would monitor his health impacts - though ethically complex, it's key as a physician to approach with an open mind to provide the best care. While steroid use may be prohibited and concerning, my priority is this patient's well-being. By having an open dialogue, I can ensure he makes an informed choice and feels comfortable coming to me for care, even if I cannot condone his actions.

student-767

Interview

If I haven't seen any problems right away, my instant reaction would be to take a second to reflect on why they feel this way. Are there any specific examples? Have I had these types of complaints before? If not, what potential situations in the past several days treating this patient could have created these issues? Were there times I was tired or had a lapse in judgment with my speech? I would really want to figure out what situations here could have led them to feeling this way, because I would strive for the best bedside manner and relationship with the patient and their family. After reflecting, I would want to talk to my supervisor to find out the specific complaints - where is my bedside manner lacking? What conversations or aspects were not good and where can I improve? I'd want to know if the supervisor thinks it's appropriate for me to potentially have an open conversation with the patient and family to improve the situation. At the end of the day, if they really feel I am not the right fit and there's nothing I can do, then it's about the patient's health and well-being. If they can't be persuaded to allow me to make changes, it may be best for me to step off the case because the patient's health comes first. However, hopefully they'd be willing to have a conversation with me about this. I'd love to not only improve the situation, but also improve myself for the future. I'd love to have a one-on-one conversation to listen to their complaints, figure out which aspects of my bedside manner need changing, and work collaboratively to make a plan for improvements going forward. I am confident in my abilities and would hope to give the best treatment. I would welcome the opportunity for feedback so I can be mindful of the changes they want and take it into consideration. If in the future it's just not a personality match after trying my best to make changes, I would have to move on and take it as a learning experience. I could have a conversation with my supervisor about whether these are ongoing issues for me, where I can improve, and if it was just a one-off personality clash. It's a good skill to be able to adapt, but if after trying to improve I'm still not able, I'll have to move on and continue improving for the future.

student-822

Interview

As a physician determining if medication side effects are worthwhile, I would first consult the patient about their priorities. I would compare the severity of their disease and its impact on their quality of life to how potential side effects could affect their daily living. For example, I would ask if side effects like nausea, weight gain, or depressive symptoms would be acceptable trade-offs for treating their condition. The patient's preferences and values are most important, so I would have an open discussion about whether mitigating their illness or avoiding side effects is more vital for their wellbeing. By eliciting the patient's goals and weighing the risks versus benefits together, we can make the best personalized medical decision. My aim is understanding what matters most to the individual when evaluating treatment options and potential consequences.

student-732

Interview

This complex scenario requires a sensitive and compassionate approach. I would disclose the information to both the mother and father together in a private, comfortable setting while being fully transparent, as this is something they deserve to know. However, I would deliver the distressing news with great caution and care given the serious implications for the family. I also believe the biological father should be informed so that future pregnancies are aware of potential risks. Disclosing misleading paternity results inevitably has consequences. My role is to navigate this difficult revelation empathetically and honestly. By choosing the appropriate time and manner to inform all parties, I aim to provide clarity while attempting to minimize the disruption and anguish such news may cause this family. Though painful, they deserve to know the truth.

student-752

Interview

Thank you for the question. I distinctly remember the book that initially sparked my interest in what I want to pursue later in life. It was a basic book about human anatomy that I found in 8th grade. It had transparent pages where you could go through the layers of the human body - the skeleton, muscles, and I remember reaching the nervous system and brain. I remember being stunned for a few minutes while reading because to the 13 year old I was, this fundamental brain information was magic to me. I couldn't believe what I was reading, and most of it remains magic to me today. As cheesy as it sounds, it was then that I realized I wanted to dedicate my life to studying the human body, but the brain in particular. I didn't know how or where I'd do that, just that I wanted to in some way. It wasn't until years later when my grandmother fell ill that I saw neurological symptoms firsthand. She had Parkinson's which progressed to delirium. She was hallucinating and saying things that didn't make sense. I had seen people get sick before, but never display neurological symptoms like that. It was disturbing because someone I had known for so long suddenly became someone I didn't know due to changes in her brain. It deeply affected me and remains with me. Later, I decided to shadow a neurologist to witness the field up close. The neurologist dealt with patients with various neurological symptoms. What stuck with me was the position the physician had and his ability to give hope. I think that's extremely unique to a physician's profession. Many noble professions help people, but physicians can give hope. As neuro patients, we face frightening possibilities of our illnesses erasing who we are. So seeing the physician give hope, saying "You'll still be you, you'll survive" had a profound effect. It reminded me of my grandmother and the helplessness I felt. It encouraged me that if I could one day give hope to someone like my past self, I'd be eternally grateful. It reinforced my excitement to potentially pursue neurosurgery at U of T. So in summary, that book sparked my initial interest in the brain, my grandmother's illness made it real, and seeing a neurologist give hope to patients reinforced medicine as the career path to pursue. Thank you for the question.

student-810

Interview

As a physician in a position of authority navigating this complex issue, there are many factors to consider. Rather than directly advising based on personal opinions or biases, I would try to understand the family's full perspective. I would aim to grasp their personal, moral and ethical values, as well as any relevant cultural values. While not imparting any assumptions, I would assist them in whatever path they choose after thoughtful reflection. My role is not to provide a direct answer, but to encourage their process of making an informed decision aligned with their beliefs. By thoroughly listening rather than steering the family in a specific direction, I allow them to determine the course they feel is most appropriate based on their circumstances. My goal is to create an open and supportive environment for these difficult conversations.

student-739

Interview

In such a scenario, my priority would be to ensure transparency and come to a collective agreement through careful deliberation with the other judges. Both presentations have very similar, on-par content, making it difficult to choose a sole winner. However, there are other factors the judges and I could consider. One is the delivery and enthusiasm or professionalism of the presenter. Another is the recency and relevance of the proposed solutions to the specific health issue and location of our event. For example, the presentation on access to primary care addresses a pressing issue in our current location. We could also consider the practicality and feasibility of the solutions - something with more profound real-world implications might meet our criteria. By discussing these factors, the other judges and I could thoughtfully decide on a winner through open deliberation.

student-760

Interview

In this scenario, there are two key stakeholders - elderly people who want to retain their right to drive, and the general public concerned about safety. I understand regulations are in place restricting elderly drivers due to declining vision and cognition, in order to protect public safety. However, I don't believe there should be a blanket rule banning driving at a certain age. Instead, each person's abilities should be evaluated individually. For instance, if an elderly driver can pass vision and reaction time tests and appears to have sufficient cognitive function to drive safely, they should not be categorically prevented from doing so. In medicine, a tailored approach is best rather than a one-size-fits-all policy. Each patient should be assessed based on their specific circumstances and capacities. With an individualized assessment, we can balance the interests of maintaining independence for the elderly while also protecting public welfare.

student-731

Interview

Once Brian explains his thoughts and feelings, we can develop a plan. I imagine he would be very upset and heartbroken. I would suggest Brian find support from teammates directly involved to see if they would join him in speaking with the coach. Together they could make the case for Brian to have at least some role they can both agree to. After compiling evidence and support, they would approach the coach honesty. I would help Brian prepare what to say and be very supportive through this process. If the worst case scenario happens and the coach still refuses, I would encourage Brian, though deeply painful, to put this aside for now and refocus his efforts on the Paralympics. Though heartbreaking, the Paralympics are also a globally recognized event to showcase his strengths and gain more popularity to further his career. I would urge Brian to continue working hard, try to move past this for now, and give his all at the Paralympics. This could provide opportunities for the Olympics in the future, while also inspiring others with disabilities with his strength and capability.

student-794

Interview

This is a tricky situation as I understand both sides of the family, and it's a very big decision that will impact many people including the family and baby. I grasp the father's perspective - if she proceeds, she can focus on her career and provide financially for the family. I also see the mother's concern about potential health risks to the baby from in vitro fertilization. I would first approach the older sister privately and non-confrontationally to gather more details on her motivations. I would suggest she research the scenario further to make a more informed choice. I would urge her to consult others she cares about for input. I would offer to help care for the baby if she decides to proceed. This allows us to come to a thoughtful decision while exploring options and impacts. By gathering more information and perspectives, we can support her through an ethical process to reach the best outcome.

student-725

Interview

In 8th grade, my elementary school basketball team was preparing for the regional tournament, which would be my final year at that school. As the team's leading scorer and offensive facilitator, a lot of pressure was on me to lead us to the championship. While I was confident in my abilities, I also knew the competition we would face. The day before the tournament, I was suddenly overcome with doubt about whether I could effectively marshal my teammates to play their roles and win. A big reason was that I wasn't very good at motivational speeches. I preferred to lead by example through my play. I knew I had to give some kind of speech to set the tone, but I struggled mightily to come up with anything good enough. The morning of the tournament, I still didn't have a plan and wondered if I would give a speech at all. But I knew my team needed that spark. So before our first game, I gathered everyone and gave a short, 1-minute speech. I clearly communicated our goal to win the championship and laid out how each player would contribute based on their strengths. I said I would lead the scoring and create opportunities for them. We didn't win the tournament, losing in the finals. But I was proud of what we accomplished against tough competition. A big factor was me overcoming self-doubt to motivate my team. What enabled me to push past the doubt was recalling positive moments of camaraderie with my teammates. Seeing our less experienced players score late in games reminded me of our strengths. Those memories motivated me to give the speech that ultimately helped lead us to the finals. Whenever self-doubt creeps in about your leadership abilities, remember your strengths and find ways to mitigate weaknesses. Focusing on past successes can help overcome doubt to make a difference. For me, that was the key to performing well under pressure.

student-771

Interview

The most important thing is to understand my cousin's level of maturity. For a very young child, I would keep the explanation simple and clear. But for an older cousin who could grasp a more meaningful discussion, I would have a deeper conversation about the benefits of volunteering. First, I would ask about his current opinions to see his existing knowledge. I would challenge him with questions about how volunteering has helped people he knows, to expand his understanding of its community impact. I could use relevant current events or local examples to illustrate how volunteers create positive change. I would tie this to my cousin's own passions. If he loves animals, I may talk about our local humane society that relies on volunteers to provide services. I would help him identify causes he cares about so he can find fulfilling volunteer opportunities, rather than forcing unrelated experiences. Volunteering is most rewarding when you follow your passions. Additionally, I would share my own volunteering experiences and the profound impact they've had on me. Hopefully through thoughtful discussion tailored to his maturity level, I could open his mind to the personal benefits volunteering can provide, just as it has for me and others I know. My goal is to encourage him by educating in a way he can understand.

student-793

Interview

This is a difficult situation since the husband is unaware. If he found out, it could damage their relationship. However, he may already know the truth. I would first approach Linda privately without her husband, since we've confirmed it's her biological son but not his. Due to confidentiality, we can only discuss with Linda initially. I would present the results and ask how she wants to proceed - if she wants me to share with her husband, I can. But ultimately, it is her decision and I would respect her preferences. If she does not want me to disclose to her husband because he is not the father, I would not do so. I have to abide by her wishes given the son is not his. My priority is having an open discussion with Linda first and then honoring her choices on how to handle this sensitive situation.

student-734

Interview

This question brings up issues of justice and helping those in need. While there is an equity problem among coworkers when some have items taken, I believe the priority should be assisting the person struggling. I would start by calling a group meeting to remind everyone about available resources like insurance plans, breakfast served daily, and supplies like toothpaste. I would ask coworkers for suggestions on improving quality of life in the office and incorporate their ideas. I would also collaborate with colleagues to try and discern who is taking the items, which I assume are not extremely valuable. This indicates someone likely facing financial hardship. I would tell the group that anyone struggling should feel free to speak with me privately so I can offer more support. While noting that stealing is unethical, I would not shame but rather aim to understand their situation. For instance, if it seems to be a diligent employee, I would consider them for a promotion based on merit, not the stealing. I would encourage open communication and convey my desire to help. If it appears to be an outsider stealing, I would add security measures. My goal would be providing financial assistance through office programs to alleviate the need for theft. I would follow up to ensure the person is doing better and offer additional help as needed. The focus should be having an empathetic, private conversation to get to the root of the issue and assist the individual.

student-777

Interview

As a patient who has autonomy he does have a right to know what's going on. However, it is important to consider the parents' feelings, as they are closest to their son. I would take time to speak to the parents and explain that their son had asked me to explain his situation, and that I can take it slowly so as to not overwhelm him. The parents may have reservations but by letting them know about how I planned to break the news, and that I wouldn't use medical jargon, it could make their son less fearful of the entire process that he was going to inevitably go through. It would be good to have their input and I would be able to stay in the good graces of both the parents and the child.

student-714

Interview

Throughout my life, I have helped care for my dad who has multiple sclerosis. His condition started worsening when I was around four or five years old, so I began assisting him at a young age. This experience has greatly developed my empathy. Even when my dad didn't explicitly ask for help, I could sense what he needed whether it was getting comfortable in bed, sitting up properly, or getting a glass of water. I learned to pay close attention to pick up on nonverbal cues. Through caring for my dad, I've become very attuned to others' health struggles and can truly empathize with their situations. There were also times when my dad's condition affected his mental health. During these difficult periods, I made an effort to communicate with him, show empathy, and reassure him that there is more to enjoy in life. He has told me this support helped tremendously, and now he is much happier and positive. I love bringing smiles to people's faces, so making my dad laugh and boosting his spirits is very rewarding. This experience taught me the importance of being there for others because you never know the impact your words and actions may have. I've learned to balance my own needs with caring for loved ones. As a future medical student, these skills of empathy, communication, and trust-building will be invaluable in developing rapport with patients. When patients feel heard, understood, and able to trust their provider, they are more likely to follow treatment recommendations. My lifelong experience caring for my dad has prepared me well for relating to future patients with compassion.

student-776

Interview

One time I disappointed my parents was when they asked me to pick up my sister from soccer practice. Both my parents were at work and had entrusted me with this responsibility. However, instead of diligently following through, I got distracted by other less urgent priorities like schoolwork and texting friends. As a result, my sister was left waiting alone at the field with no ride. My parents were very let down that I did not fulfill my duty responsibly. In hindsight, I should have prioritized better. The other tasks could have waited, but getting my sister on time was truly important. I learned an important lesson about setting the right priorities and fulfilling my obligations, especially when relying on me. Moving forward, I aim to match my actions to what matters most rather than getting distracted. I continue to feel regretful about that incident, but it helped reinforce values of responsibility and diligence that guide me today.

student-756

Interview

Patient confidentiality ensures everything the patient tells a clinician is held in confidence. The patient-physician relationship can be strained without trust between them. Having confidentiality breeds trust. As a patient, I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing personal information if it would be shared. Confidentiality makes people feel comfortable opening up - they wouldn't tell these things to others if it could spread. It's so important for trust and the physician-patient relationship. It also fosters patient autonomy, which is important in Canadian healthcare. Ensuring the patient controls what they share is key. As a physician, you need to try to get all relevant information, and patients may not be comfortable telling certain things to family/friends, so they need someone trusted to open up to. That's why it's important never to break confidentiality, unless the patient is at risk of harming themselves or others. If they say something alarming, you have a duty to ensure they get resources needed and involve others to solve the situation delicately. Personally in my clinical experience I haven't had to break confidentiality. My interactions were preparing patients for appointments, performing ECGs, explaining the test - nothing too personal. I have dealt with confidentiality on an engineering team for a satellite launch. We had sensitive design information and signed an NDA. It was tricky later when applying for jobs and wanting to discuss the experience but needing to word things carefully under the NDA. So while I haven't broken confidentiality myself, it's a difficult situation and I recognize the challenges in maintaining it while also caring for patients. But it is foundational to build that trust.

student-814

Interview

I believe it is ethical for any profession to strike if collective conditions and compensation are unjust, regardless of the immediacy or urgency of services. Nobody should be forced to work under inadequate conditions. Though there may be concerns about physicians failing duties to society by striking, as humans they have rights to free speech and standing up for beliefs. Healthcare is critical, but doctors deserve fair treatment too. However, certain steps could be taken to mitigate the effects on patients. Doctors could continue providing emergency and urgent care or give advanced notice so hospitals can make alternate arrangements. With the right precautions to avoid harm, physicians deserve to leverage strikes when necessary, just as any mistreated worker would. The goal would be raising awareness and advocating for change while minimizing disruption to patients.

student-746

Interview

Working at a grocery warehouse was physically demanding. On many days after my shift, I felt like quitting. However, I strived to stay optimistic and focus on the light at the end of the tunnel. What motivated me to keep going back was both financial need and the potential opportunities. I imagined that if I stuck it out, I could build connections with supervisors and managers to eventually move up in the company. This long term thinking kept me from acting on the temptation to quit. With perseverance and networking internally, I was able to gain a Team Leader position which was less labor-intensive than my initial warehouse role picking and packing items. My optimism drove me to look beyond the present challenges and see a path forward. I learned that it's often worthwhile to persist through difficulty if longer term benefits are possible. By overcoming the physical demands through a positive mindset and relationship building, I was able to advance in that company.

student-779

Interview

In this situation with my sister, I would communicate the factors of risk and reliability to consider. There are some red flags around the health of the person receiving the embryo implantation and their capacity to sustain a pregnancy. We'd need to assess if they are being properly cared for and could provide a healthy environment for fetal development. This reminds me of an experience I had when looking to buy a cheap used car on Kijiji during a financially difficult time. At first glance, the low price seemed perfect. But when I mapped the seller's address, it was a sketchy, secluded barn rather than a house. Despite the initial appeal, observational evidence revealed too many risks and unreliability factors. So I decided not to go through with it. Similarly here, we need to carefully evaluate the safety and wellbeing of the person carrying the pregnancy before agreeing to this in vitro fertilization. Can we be fully confident this person is healthy enough to support a baby and provide proper care through gestation? The goal should be minimizing risks and maximizing the reliability of a healthy fetal environment. Just like I avoided the questionable used car purchase, proceeding requires fully addressing these concerns first.

student-781

Interview

I believe physician-assisted suicide can be ethically appropriate if certain conditions are met. The patient's medical condition must be deteriorating with no viable treatment options left. They should be fully informed of all alternatives, including hospice and palliative care focused on pain and symptom management. If after being provided information on and careful consideration of these options, the patient still believes physician-assisted suicide aligns with their values and preferences, their autonomy should be respected. However, it is imperative that the physician ensures the patient has full decision-making capacity and is making an informed, voluntary choice. With appropriate safeguards in place to confirm it is the patient's wish and that all alternatives have been explored, physician-assisted suicide could be conducted ethically in specific end-of-life care scenarios. The key is prioritizing patient autonomy based on fully informed consent.

student-775

Interview

The main issue here is the spreading of misinformation or disinformation about the potential causes of multiple sclerosis. We know based on extensive scientific evidence that aspartame does not cause MS. However, dispelling claims like this can be difficult when they contain half-truths - information that is true in some contexts but misapplied. For example, it's true neurons can be overexcited by chemicals, potentially causing cell death. But there is no evidence aspartame causes widespread neuron overexcitation or death, which is seen in MS. In fact, we understand MS to be an autoimmune disorder where immune cells attack neurons. When addressing misinformation, it's important not to be aggressive or dismissive, as that often further entrenches false beliefs. A compassionate, open approach is more effective. Ask probing questions to unravel the flawed logic behind the claims. For example, where did you get this information about aspartame? Discuss the reliability of the source. Explain the actual scientific understanding of MS's pathophysiology and aspartame's effects in clear, digestible terms. While aspartame may be a carcinogen, that's unrelated to MS. It's key to dissociate inaccurate connections. Additionally, proactively address questions the person may raise. If you respond to X question in one way, consider how they could respond with Y and prepare a response. Keep the conversation moving forward productively. Validate their concerns and doubts, while clearly communicating what we conclusively know based on current evidence. If knowledge gaps exist, acknowledge we're still working to fully understand MS's causes but can confidently rule out aspartame. Admitting the limits of scientific knowledge shows we take their doubts seriously, even as we dispel falsehoods. The goal is to listen compassionately, build trust, and have an open, evidence-based discussion to counter misinformation. Not all questions have complete answers yet, but we must communicate accurately what is scientifically known and unknown.

student-769

Interview

I'll just start with a little bit of my background. I have a very active background. I've been involved in multiple sports throughout my life, whether that was gymnastics, horse riding, hockey, hiking, and weightlifting. Through those activities, I've been able to grow as a person and do those in a community with people and just improve my overall health and wellbeing. I realize the benefit that fitness can have for people and how much an injury can hinder those goals. As a physiotherapist, I would be able to help people achieve those fitness goals. I've also had numerous injuries from sports, and I've been in four car accidents. I know that makes me sound like a really bad driver, but I was a passenger in all of them. Just want to throw that in there. So anyways, I've been to the physiotherapist countless times through the years, and honestly, I wouldn't be where I was at today without them. I realized this is where my passion lies, that I want to be able to be in that role myself and help people recover because I've experienced so much benefit from physiotherapists. I love to be able to be in a direct role to help people get back to their normal activities. I also have a passion for analyzing human movement and being able to produce optimal performance, which I believe would be possible in my role as a physiotherapist. I've worked in retail for many years as an assistant manager and a supervisor, and through that time, I've been able to refine my communication skills and my teamwork skills as well. Both of these are extremely important as a physiotherapist. I would look forward to being able to use them in this career. I know this sounds a bit mundane, but I really do enjoy stocking shelves because I enjoy the challenge, the problem solving and just working with my hands. I really enjoy that. And I believe as a physiotherapist, I would be able to use those skills every day, and nothing would bring me greater satisfaction. I also have attention to detail, and I've been able to refine that through my management position. I believe that's a very necessary skill to have in healthcare when you're dealing with sensitive issues and medical records. I'm also a very empathetic person, and I have a passion for helping people who are in difficult positions. That's led me to volunteer with Special Olympics, where I was able to interact with athletes who had mental disabilities and just assist them in playing sports. And I've also volunteered at homeless shelters, interacting and serving the guests, also volunteering at a physio clinic for quite a while and being able to provide direct treatment to the patients. Through all of these things, I realized how much joy and satisfaction it gave me to be able to see the joy on people's faces as they were able to accomplish more than they thought they were able, or maybe move just a bit better. Just being able to play a role in their recovery and restoring mobility and helping them achieve their goals. So in summary, my physically active background, my experience in retail, my interaction with physiotherapists, and my passion for working with people has confirmed that physiotherapy is where I want to be.

student-804

Interview

I once had a family funeral happening at the same time as a basketball game where I was team captain. I chose to go to the game instead of attending the funeral with my mom, even though it was for a relative she was close to and she wanted my support. When I got home, I realized this was the wrong decision and felt terrible that my mom went through it alone when I could have been there for her. From that experience, I learned I need to prioritize and sacrifice for what's truly important, even if it's difficult. As a doctor, you sometimes have to sacrifice personal time to provide the best care for patients. Having compassion will help not only as a physician, but in all aspects of life. It builds character, integrity, respect, and love for others. My goal is remembering to put people first, as I should have done by being there for my mom during her time of need.

student-735

Interview

This is obviously a very complex dilemma with no easy comprehensive solution that satisfies all stakeholders. The primary conflict is balancing free speech versus safety and well-being of users when social media platforms restrict or remove content deemed discriminatory or offensive. On one hand, allowing individuals to display any content exercises their right to free speech. However, this risks making parts of the user base feel unsafe or lose those users entirely, which impacts revenue. So platforms have to determine which content is truly discriminatory or offensive enough to warrant restricting. If content is designed to intentionally hurt certain groups, then removing it is warranted. But content not meant to be hurtful, even if offensive to some, requires more consideration before removal. There is no universally correct solution yet, as evidenced by cancel culture debates. Perspectives of free speech advocates and vulnerable groups like BIPOCs and LGBTQ+ must be balanced, which is extremely difficult. Personally, I would prioritize user safety on a social media platform, even at some cost to free speech. If content is likely to be broadly harmful if proliferated, removing it is reasonable. The top priority should be ensuring all users feel safe, welcome, and able to express themselves. So I agree with removing intentionally harmful content. But possibly offensive content requires more discussion before removal. Well-being of all users should be the number one priority for social media platforms.

student-768

Interview

I'll get right into the prompt about whether physicians should be able to lie to or withhold truth from patients, even if it's for the patient's own good. I recognize this can be a difficult situation, especially with difficult news where a physician may feel sharing information could trigger an undesired response in the patient. However, looking at different perspectives, the physician is involved in care delivery but the patient's perspective must also be considered. If physicians aren't transparent and don't fully deliver information, especially if the patient wants to know, I think physicians have a duty to tell the truth. I don't think lying benefits patients. Transparency fosters trust between provider and patient, which is necessary for the patient to also be truthful. If a physician lies or withholds truth, what's stopping a patient from withholding critical information affecting their care? It gives a sense of practicing paternalistic rather than patient-centered care, and not treating the patient as an equal person deserving respect. Telling the truth fosters trust. It's difficult if not impossible for a physician to fully know how someone will react to news, so just because it's difficult doesn't mean it should be withheld. There are diagnoses where hearing it may do more harm in the moment by causing panic. But the patient still has a right to know. If test results could be false positives, you can suggest more tests be done but still inform the patient. You cannot withhold just because you think it will do more harm than good. Contingencies like mental illness are important - you still tell the truth but may alter how you deliver it through pacing information, softening delivery, etc. But the information itself, I believe patients have a right to know.

student-813

Interview

Growing up as an immigrant, I've noticed healthcare disparities. In Palestine, my brother has diabetes and asthma, requiring frequent hospital visits. Despite limited supplies, doctors did everything to make us feel safe and reassure us of quality care. After immigrating to Canada, we had plentiful resources but faced cultural and language barriers. As I learned English, I translated between doctors and my parents. Though challenged, physicians welcomed us, guided us to resources, and brought in Arabic speakers to ensure excellent care for my brother. Later, working with patients myself, I strived to implement the same compassionate approach I had experienced. By listening empathetically and understanding obstacles to care, I could help vulnerable patients feel heard. Oftentimes, they simply need someone to listen. As a physician, this compassion is so important. Shadowing doctors, I've seen their leadership role on the healthcare team, delegating tasks and making final calls. Their long-term guidance through patients' journeys also resonated with me. I aim to provide that ongoing medical and emotional support to create lasting change. Advocating for patients while solving complex cases over many years embodies my goals as a physician. My experiences navigating disparities as an immigrant exposed me to physician practices that resonated deeply - patient-centered care and lifelong dedication. These inspire me to pursue medicine to listen to, support, and empower patients in overcoming any barriers on the path to health.

student-750

Interview

I agree this problematic behavior cannot be justified despite Dr. A's strong surgical outcomes. Fostering disrespect erodes team cohesion, which harms care quality. If staff feel constantly disrespected, they will be less motivated, compromising patient outcomes. Allowing this culture risks trainees emulating such conduct, propagating disrespectful patterns. Treating patients dismissively dehumanizes them, infringing on their rights and dignity. Research shows dehumanization impairs care. Though Dr. A's individual metrics are strong, condoning this behavior will enable greater harm long-term. A disrespectful environment will breed future disrespectful practitioners, eventually degrading care for countless patients. While short-term surgical results matter, the downstream effects of normalized mistreatment pose too great a risk. Upholding patient dignity and nurturing collaborative team cultures must remain paramount. Overall, Dr. A's pattern of disrespect cannot be justified solely by immediate outcomes, as it threatens patient wellbeing and staff integrity in the long run.

student-828

Interview

This is tricky because the patient needs the medication, so it must be administered despite potential side effects. I would first research the literature to understand what other patients have experienced and how side effects were mitigated. Taking a holistic approach to understand the patient's specific needs and lifestyle is key. For example, I have stomach issues myself and make dietary and behavioral changes to alleviate problems that certain medications can exacerbate. After learning about the patient's lifestyle and listening to their concerns, I can offer tailored solutions to manage side effects. To determine if treatment is worthwhile, I would weigh the pros and cons. I would make a detailed list of the benefits and risks to inform our decision. I would also consult other doctors about their experiences managing similar cases. Most importantly, I would have an open discussion with the patient about their preferences and priorities. They have autonomy in the decision, so it must be made jointly. Ultimately, if side effects accompany a treatment that is critical for their survival, I would move forward to provide the best possible care. By researching thoroughly, listening to the patient, and weighing all factors, we can make the most ethical, personalized treatment decision.

student-726

Interview

I believe this is a complicated issue with many perspectives on universal basic income. There are pros and cons, but I am more in favor of it as I believe people should be able to provide for themselves and their families. As a physician, this career is about advocating for others, and the ultimate form of advocacy is ensuring people can provide for and advocate for themselves. A basic income is essential for people to be able to do that.

student-815

Interview

Hi Jason, I wanted to come over and check in on you. I know how hardworking you are and am aware you are applying to medical school and can imagine how difficult these past few weeks have been. I wanted to ask how you are doing and whether there is anything I can assist you with. I don't want you to fall behind in class and our professor is worried about your attendance. Perhaps we could write him an email together explaining the stress you are under and he may be able to help you by giving extensions or allowing me to bring your work to you. I could also help you find some resources or tools to manage your stress, such as mindfulness exercises or making a scheduled plan. My goal is to support you during this challenging time - please let me know how I can help.

student-718

Interview

I believe it is unprofessional for a physician to date their patient. As doctors, we must prioritize our patients' best interests and follow the principle of beneficence. Although the relationship may not directly harm the patient, it could impact their care and health outcomes. My first step would be to have a private conversation with my colleague to understand the situation fully. I would not want to make assumptions or accusations without hearing their perspective first. I would ask how long the relationship has been going on, how serious it is, and if there are plans like marriage. Depending on their responses, I would consult our clinic's ethical policies to see if such relationships are prohibited or if parameters exist. If it is a long-term, serious bond and our policies permit it with conditions, I may suggest the patient switch doctors while allowing the relationship to continue. However, if it violates our ethical code outright, I would encourage ending the affair. For a more casual relationship, I would urge my colleague to discuss it with HR and follow their guidance. In any case, I would provide support through the process and follow up to ensure the matter is handled properly. While sympathetic to their situation, our duty as physicians is to our patients first. We must make choices that promote their well-being.

student-791

Interview

Hi Jason, it's good to see you today. I'm glad we could meet up. I was wondering how you've been the last few days since I haven't heard from you - I was concerned. How are the medical school applications going? Is everything okay generally? Have you been eating and sleeping alright? It was surprising when you didn't come to class since you're usually so diligent. I'm sure there's a logical reason, but as your friend I want to make sure you're doing well. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help or if you need someone to talk to. I'm here for you and just want to make sure you're taking care of yourself. Let me know if you need anything at all.

student-755

Interview

In this complex situation, I would aim to uphold my duties as a medical professional while also seeking to understand the individual's perspective. I would have a private conversation to gather details on their concerns with being hospitalized and empathize with their reasoning. Perhaps past hospital trauma is fueling this behavior. Recognizing the motivations behind their actions is key. I would offer emotional support and tailor my approach to accommodate their needs with sensitivity. This may involve being mindful when providing medical advice and directing them to additional mental health resources. My priority is fulfilling my role as their provider while also showing compassion. By listening and gaining insight into their viewpoint, I can better serve this patient in an ethically sound manner that addresses both their medical and emotional needs during a difficult hospitalization.

student-748

Interview

The main reason I really want to become a physiotherapist started when I was young. I played a lot of sports and have always been interested in science. Playing sports, I've had the misfortune of many injuries. Starting around age 12, I've had to go to physio multiple times. I've been to many clinics as I got older, playing lacrosse at a high level and football. I've seen different physios because the teams have different affiliations. So I've had a lot of great experiences with physiotherapists. With my interest in science and studying anatomy and research in high school and university, I've reflected on my experiences and found physiotherapy combines my interests. It allows me to work one-on-one with people at the intersection of anatomy, physiology, physical activity, health, wellness, movement, sports, injury recovery, and improving daily living. You incorporate knowledge, research, and new developments in collaboration with doctors, occupational therapists, and other physiotherapists to create the best plan for each patient. This really interests me. My exposure to different physios provided great role models who inspired me to continue my journey as an athlete and scholar. When I was able to reevaluate what I value, those influences focused me on becoming a physiotherapist. Additionally, my experience coaching and working with kids with autism has shown I work well and communicate effectively one-on-one. I enjoy the process of helping someone improve their abilities and quality of life through movement in a one-on-one setting. I want to put people in a position to succeed. Coaching has allowed me to create positive environments and build relationships with each player to ensure they can improve, have fun, make friends, and gain lifelong healthy skills. These experiences have reinforced and further influenced my desire to be a physiotherapist, as I want to provide this on a daily basis. I think it plays to my strengths.

student-823

Interview

From what I understand in the prompt, I'm a physician. A 16 year old patient comes to me and wants a specific procedure. Her parents are in disagreement with that procedure. I'm kind of asked, who do I have to listen to in this situation? This is actually a very difficult situation. The ethical dilemma is here on think. First is autonomy versus being able to make a well informed decision and regarding the family's dynamic. Before I say what I would do, there's many perspectives I have to look at. At first there's a perspective of the patient, the 16 year old. Then there's a perspective of the family as well. And the last perspective is the perspective of the physician with the relationship with both the family and the patient. I'm going to discuss a bit of pros and cons within each perspective. In the perspective of the patient, the patient comes to the physician with trust. They come with, I don't know what the procedure is. This can be a life changing procedure. It can be a procedure that can enhance confidence. It can be a procedure that can treat an illness. Depending on the situation, I think if a patient comes to you with trust, that trust should be taken without the most importance. By accepting that procedure and doing it for the 16 year old, you're allowing them to keep having that confidence of physicians. If you don't do that treatment, you can possibly hinder a future relationship with the physician because the 60 year old might be upset and might not want to seek medical attention anymore. These are important things to consider. The family's perspective, I think it's a very similar perspective to the child. I know that in most cases, a family really wants what's best for their child. I know that they're looking out for the best interest of their child. We have to understand that maybe they're scared of this procedure. Maybe they don't know what the procedure entails and what the actual reason behind why the 16 year old wants that procedure. Lastly, it's the physician. The physician, I think, in this situation has to be well informed of the decision he's taking, because he has to make sure that the patient is well informed, that the family is well informed, that he tries his best to keep the relationship as positive as possible through this whole interaction with the disagreement within the family. For what I would do, if I were to listen to the patient or the family, this is very contextual based. I have to speak with the patient. I have to determine and see if they're in the mental capacity to make such decisions on their own. I have to understand if they understand the risk and complications of the procedure. I also have to see if this is a medically necessary treatment as it might not even be medically necessary. I have to gather that information. I have to know the reasoning of why my patient wants to have this procedure and if they're in the consent, if they're in the capacity to make the decision. If I can tell they're mature enough to make that choice on their own, I don't know if there's an age of consent in Canada, but I would grant that procedure to that patient should it be legal. Now, if they're not in the capacity and they don't understand what's going on and they want to do it for unnecessary reasons and put unnecessary risk on their body, and I can cause kind of harm to them by doing this procedure, I would not offer the treatment and not because I would listen to the family, but because I don't think it's the right course of action medically. But in either case, I think the approach I would take is to see if they're well informed, if they have the capacity to make that decision. After I make that choice, regardless of the choice, I will show that I still care for the patient. I will remain as a kind of shoulder to lean on for knowledge after the procedure to give them access to post depends if it's operations like post operative care or follow up procedures or follow up visits to see if that procedure went well. I will also speak with the family and let them know why I made my choice, that I didn't just do it to undermine them, but I did it because I believe that that procedure was medically necessary and that their child had the capacity to make that choice. But in large, I would try to keep my relationship with both the patient and the family as positive as possible as this may have long term implications on them wanting to seek medical attention and it can have long term negative consequences if I don't maintain that relationship, if they trust in the medical system.

student-832

Interview

I currently live with my grandparents and use a car provided by my dad for transportation to university - a privilege I really appreciate. However, about a year ago I was in a minor accident with friends late one night after an exam when we went out to celebrate. At first I was hesitant since I prefer early nights, but agreed to bond with them. Telling my family breached their trust, as they disapprove of me being out late. They felt I misused the car they provided for my education. Breaking this news and their disappointment was deeply upsetting. The situation was difficult, but I've persevered and things have improved. Looking back, I should have considered my family's wishes over my friends' social plans. My education is the priority they had in mind for the car, not late nights out. I regret the mistake in judgement, but I continue to work hard in my studies to honor their support. I remain grateful for the opportunity I have been given. The accident reinforced the importance of responsibility in upholding my family's trust.

student-757

Interview

In this situation, I would carefully weigh the potential outcomes of a liver transplant for both patients. For the 64-year-old alcoholic, there is some uncertainty whether they would adhere to post-transplant treatments and lifestyle changes needed to maintain health. In contrast, the younger mother of three may have greater probability of benefit and compliance. Age is a factor, as the mother has more expected years of life ahead. There are also consequences for her children if she does not survive. However, if I could speak to the alcoholic and feel confident they would commit to sobriety and medical care, I would likely select them for transplant. Adherence is the key factor. I'd want to know the duration of alcoholism and any history of prior treatments failed due to non-compliance. If the alcoholic has repeatedly been non-adherent, I would select the mother to receive the liver. Her age and responsibility to her children tip the balance. But with demonstrated commitment to treatment from the alcoholic, I would support transplanting them over the slightly younger candidate. The decision rests significantly on my assessment of postoperative compliance to ensure success.

student-783

Interview

This is clearly a very challenging situation with multiple perspectives to consider. First, I would try to understand each person's reasoning and motivations. I would meet privately with our mother, who opposes the in vitro fertilization, to understand her concerns in a non-judgmental way. Perhaps she feels the process of using a surrogate in India is unethical. I would listen openly, while not validating or invalidating her views. Next, I would speak to my sister to understand why she wants to pursue IVF and confirm she has thoroughly considered the pros, cons and alternatives. While staying at work during pregnancy is a consideration, this is ultimately about starting a family, so I would want to ensure she has reflected deeply on her choice. As her brother, if after careful thought my sister feels IVF is the right decision for her, I would support her as an adult capable of making her own choices, regardless of our parents' conflicting views. I would try to bring everyone together to discuss perspectives openly and foster understanding. My role is to be a neutral party helping my sister feel empowered in her decision-making, while also respecting our parents have strong feelings from places of care and concern. This is a complex situation with emotional nuance around family, career and ethics. Through open communication, hopefully common ground can be found.

student-773

Interview

You know, even though I understand that everyone wants to go and that it's a really great opportunity for everyone, I simply do not have the money to let everybody go. And it is my responsibility to make sure that the trip is well planned and that requires money. However, it's also my responsibility to accommodate members of my team. So I think first, the first thing I would do is speak with my two other colleagues, because I think we have to address the situation as a team, since we are a team, and I would ask them first what they would do in this situation and also explain what I would do. And we can just brainstorm and gather ideas together. Then if we don't find any ideas, I would of course tell the other team members that we have a problem, and I would explain to them the problem, because if I were them, I would not like to be left out of the blue. So I would of course tell them what's going on and also take their input into consideration. If we still don't have any ideas and no one suggested any ideas, then I would actually talk to the university and ask them if we could have another payment for our club so that we can all go, and I would explain to them the situation. I can also collaborate with the other clubs and other universities and ask them if they have other fundings and collaborate with them and ask them where they got their money from. If that does not work, I could also find cheaper accommodations. Like if we have to travel, then I'll find cheaper hotels and cheaper transportation ways to go there. If that still doesn't work, then I would have to sacrifice myself. But I don't think I'll be missing out on much because I would join on Zoom. I would ask the others to film everything and to post them and to call me and film everything. So that would be me along with the five other members who can go. We'd make sure to film everything that is essential. If that still does not work, then I would only let three members go. But who would I choose? I would choose those who can do the most and can learn the most. So I would take the most motivated people, actually. And I created Google Forms, where I would ask questions about everybody's motivations, and I would only take the members who have actually shown interest into the club and who have participated a lot since I'd assume they're the ones who are the most invested and who are the most interested. I would also take the people whose answers were well thought and that I saw they passed a lot of time on it. However, I would also make sure that this is only a one time thing, and I would make sure that for the other trips we're organized, that we have enough money. And I think if we're to this point where I didn't have any money left, it means that I didn't organize everything well. So I would have to check on where I went wrong and have to fix the solution or the problem by myself and with my other teammates. And yeah, lastly, I would just follow up and ask if everybody's okay with the solution. And if they aren't, well, I'll take their criticism into consideration and try to accommodate them on my best. So I just follow up with them.

student-800

Interview

I think there are several potential ethical issues in this scenario that should be addressed. The first step would be to speak privately with the attending physician, in a respectful manner, after the exam. I would start by asking if the patient consented to having students present for the intimate exam. Even if consent was obtained, I felt the patient looked uncomfortable when asked to lift her shirt with us in the room. Sensitive exams require direct consent from the patient, which wasn't clearly obtained here. I would explain my perspective - that getting the patient's explicit consent and ensuring her comfort should be the priority. However, I would listen openly if the attending has a different viewpoint, given their greater experience. If we cannot agree, I may need to raise the issue to a supervisor, as a last resort. As a student, I have limited power in this situation. If I felt very uncomfortable with the lack of consent and wished to leave but was refused, that would compound the ethical issues. My goal would be to have an open discussion and come to an understanding, so the patient's preferences regarding consent and privacy are respected in the future. This protects her dignity while also upholding ethical standards in medicine.

student-772

Interview

This is an important issue involving someone close to me, so I need to address it without bias but make clear the seriousness of her actions. I would ask to speak with her privately at a time when she's not exhausted or overwhelmed. Bringing donuts or something to show care, I'd gently ask how much she had to drink to understand what led to this. If heavy drinking is new or unusual for her, I'd want to know more about what caused that. Most importantly, I would advise her to seek out information on the person she hit - visit the intersection for cameras, check local medical centers. She needs to take responsibility for apologizing, compensating the victim's family, and correcting her mistake as much as possible. Drunk driving resulting in an accident is unacceptable. For the future, I would offer to be with her when drinking to ensure she doesn't drive impaired. I'd discuss alternatives like Uber, public transit, calling me or someone else for a ride. She can always contact me rather than drive drunk. If charges are pressed, I would encourage her to admit guilt and accept the consequences. Actively righting the wrong through apology and restitution may minimize penalties. But accountability is essential. My goal is helping her understand the gravity of her actions, take responsibility, and prevent any recurrence, while also providing support as her friend.

student-782

Interview

I believe the issue of medical programs mandating a 2-3 year stay in rural northern Ontario is very important. The shortage of physicians in rural areas remains an ongoing debate that needs immediate attention, primarily due to the difficulty rural residents face accessing quality care amidst staffing shortages. In my opinion, integrating this mandatory rural stint after graduation could have both positives and negatives. First, it would significantly increase the physician presence in these areas. However, it risks physicians leaving to return to urbanized cities or suburbs nearer their families once the stint ends. This could cause physician numbers to spike then plummet. There's no guarantee of retention past 2-3 years. Yet some may find rural practice unexpectedly rewarding and remain. Overall, predicting an individual physician's actions is difficult given personal circumstances. Healthcare costs could also fluctuate if physician turnover is high, as lower staffing often increases prices. However, a continuous influx, even if temporary, can positively impact rural infrastructure and policies by adding expertise. In summary, the long-term implications past 2-3 years are uncertain. Further research into effective, sustainable solutions for rural retention is needed. While complex with many factors, deeper investigation and resources could drive real improvements in rural care. Mandated rural stints could help but require careful implementation to avoid instability.

student-762

Interview

When I was younger, I tried out for many soccer teams but could never make it. The players treated me poorly, saying I wasn't good enough and making fun of me. At the time, I felt disrespected without understanding their perspective. The kids may not have known how to properly treat others and thought it was a joke. What I really gained from that situation is more significant than their actions. I learned to never give up. I kept going and eventually made a soccer team. This experience applies to becoming a doctor. There will be many hard times, so you must keep trying even when you lack confidence. Perseverance will make you a great physician able to provide excellent care. While the teasing was difficult, it taught me an important lesson that guides me to this day - never quit in pursuit of your goals.

student-724

Interview

This is a difficult situation because as a physician, I always want to ensure that the patient, whoever they're associated with, is experiencing and having competent care, but also that they feel comfortable with the care that they are given. For them to feel uncomfortable is an injustice. As a physician, I would first in this situation, if they're talking to the supervisor, ask the supervisor if they would be comfortable enough meeting with me again. If they are, I would say that as a physician, my primary responsibility is towards the patient. I will do whatever I can in my power to ensure that your patient care experience is as comfortable as possible. I would ask if they're willing to meet with me in order to discuss how we can improve this relationship and what I can do to ensure that the patient is not only fully autonomous but is receiving competent and comfortable care. If they are comfortable enough meeting with me, then I would meet with the patient and their family. I would say to the family that I will do whatever I can in my power to ensure that you receive competent and comfortable care. I would address any concerns that they may have. I would ask if they were willing to continue with me as a physician, and if they believed that even though I address these issues, if they believed that they would have a more comfortable care experience with someone else, I would put them in contact with another physician, or I would ask my supervisor to put them in contact with another physician. Although in a perfect world, if I was being completely objective and there weren't any issues with the care, then I would want to continue with them being their physician. But if they believe they'd be more comfortable with someone else, the primary responsibility as a healthcare provider is that you give your patients the most comfortable experience that they can have. I would ensure that they are with a physician which can provide them with the care and comfort that they require.

student-819

Interview

In this scenario, my best friend tells me that he is a compulsive gambler and he asks for my money after discussing the broad implications of gambling on society. The first thing that I would do is gather as much information as possible. I will try to ask about his personal circumstances. They mentioned they don't have any money to buy even food - can they elaborate on that? What do they mean by no money? Are they in the negatives or barely getting by? In addition, are they in any form of danger? As of now, they mentioned needing to pay back loan sharks. Are they currently pressuring my friend or potentially threatening them? Third, if they don't have money now, how are they affording housing? If renting or paying a mortgage, how will they pay next month? Lastly, I have to provide empathy, listen non-judgmentally. Gambling addiction is like any addiction - it's very hard to quit, not just a matter of willpower but brain connections. So I want to support my friend without judgment. With that in mind, it's important to think about my friend's family. Have they reached out to family for money? Do they know about the gambling? How is their relationship after finding out? I want to consider their wellbeing and how I can support them too. Lastly, what kind of societal help has my friend sought out? For example, if they can't afford housing, have they reached out for housing aid, addiction counseling, financial aid? What societal help have they received or reached out for? So after gathering information, it's important to decide on my actions. I want to help my friend but not feed the gambling behavior. I will ask them to elaborate on using the money to "win it all back" - does that mean more gambling? I will let them know I'm happy to help pay back the loan sharks so they aren't in danger, but won't support gambling as a way out. So if they agree to pay back loans only, I will give the money. Then I'll try to connect them to addiction resources, financial aid, housing aid, etc. to guide them away from gambling and towards sustainability. That concludes my answer. Please let me know if you have any follow up questions. Thank you.

student-809

Interview

So why do I want to be a doctor? Well, there are many reasons why I want to be a doctor, but I'm going to tell you a bit about my experiences in the past that really made me want to become a doctor and really motivated me. Ever since I was born, I've had to help my father with his condition, which is multiple sclerosis, and it's always been pretty bad. I've always had to be there for him and to be empathetic towards his situation. It really helped me develop communication skills, but also empathy. Before I could even say something or say what made him uncomfortable, or if he needed to be repositioned in his bed, or if he needed a glass of water, I could just always read his thoughts and I could just feel what he was feeling and provide the necessary care. I could just see, for example, and notice things and I just knew that he needed something. It also contributed to bettering my communication skills because I could just talk to him about how he's feeling and I've always had to reassure him and make him know that it's always going to get better and that he's not alone in this. So I've had to offer a lot of reassurance also. Well, it's part of my day to day life, so I know what it's like to take care of someone. I know what it's like to be in a bit of a medical environment and as I said, it's always been part of my life and so it does not stress me, it does not disturb me. It's actually something I love doing. I love being there for him and being able to just put a smile on his face in any way I can. If it's by giving him a glass of water, then I'm very happy to do so. As I said, I've been there for him and showed empathy and told him that I'm always there for him. Also, when I was little, I had a huge accident with my right arm. After the surgery, I remember speaking with the doctors and they were laughing and they were really making me happy. They teased me a bit about the situation and it just put a smile on my face and it really made me happy and made me laugh. I just realized at that time that it's really who I wanted to be in life, that my goal in life was to just be able to put a smile on people's faces and just seeing people happy is what makes me happy. I felt comfortable, I felt not alone, I felt surrounded and I felt like I could trust them. That's another point I want to mention. It's that I've always gained people's trust easily. So I'm someone that people can count on and I've always gained their trust and for me that's really important. I like being someone who's trustworthy and just so that I can be able to help them, to help them. I also love interacting with other people, I love being social and I really learned a lot about myself and to interact with other people really makes me happy. Also in a more academic aspect. Well, I've always liked the biology course and when I was little I always had this book. It was very interactive and it was about the human body and I remember falling asleep with it every day. I also have a very analytical brain and I love solving issues and problems and it's something that's fun to me but I also always like to understand what's happening before solving a problem but I usually always come to a solution. I also have critical thinking which really helps me in situations and I think it's essential to be a doctor and to analyze things. I'm also very calm, I love reassuring people, I think it's really important to do so. I love offering a calm presence to people so that they feel safe and comfortable with me.

student-798

Interview

The issue is that I believe this is not ethical at all. I understand the doctor's perspective - they may feel they have created some sort of relationship. However, as a doctor, this should not be allowed. There is a significant power imbalance between the patient and physician. It's uncertain how much real consent the vulnerable patient can provide. This power imbalance contributes to the unethical nature of the situation. Another reason is that it dismisses proper care - the interaction creates bias that interferes with care. Finally, it violates professional boundaries that doctors must maintain as professionals and in a hospital setting. For these reasons, I do not believe it is ethical at all.

student-722

Interview

The core issue here is that if we don't intervene, the kids could continue assaulting this woman, which is highly unethical and dangerous. However, we need more information to properly address the situation. Some key questions: How often do these girls come by? Why are they hitting her - is the woman provoking them in some way? Is she potentially doing something illegal herself? There are a lot of unknowns to investigate first. I would approach the woman privately in a non-confrontational manner and ask for her perspective on the situation. If she reveals she is doing something illegal, I would likely have to report both parties to the proper authorities. However, if she is innocent, then we can look into reporting the assault by the girls to the police or appropriate powers, so official action can be taken. By thoughtfully intervening, we may be able to stop the assaults and protect the woman, which is an important responsibility as a bystander observing violence. But gathering more details first, rather than making assumptions, allows us to respond in the most fair, ethical manner for all involved. The goal is stopping harm while avoiding escalating the conflict further.

student-721

Interview

Thank you for sharing this challenging situation. I appreciate you thoughtfully considering multiple perspectives - the patient, physician, and broader public. This appears to be an ethically complex scenario involving issues like conflict of interest, professionalism, and trust. I agree the ideal approach is to first have an open, non-judgmental dialogue with my colleague to better understand how this relationship developed. It's important we don't assume ill intent without details. I would want to know if my peer feels they can still objectively treat this patient, and discuss options like referring them to another provider to avoid any conflicts. Ultimately though, physicians should likely refrain from romantic relationships with current patients due to inherent power imbalances. If my colleague is unwilling to cease seeing the patient, I would need to escalate the matter professionally. Our duty is to deliver unbiased care, and an intimate involvement could jeopardize that. However, I would aim to handle this sensitively. There may be personal issues underlying my peer's choices. As physicians, we need to balance multiple duties - to patients, colleagues, and society. In this case, patient wellbeing should come first while also preserving my colleague's dignity. With open communication and discretion, I'm hopeful this situation could be resolved to uphold ethical standards. Please let me know if you need any clarification or have additional questions.

student-831

Interview

In this complex scenario, I would aim to balance public safety and the autonomy of elderly drivers. As someone living with grandparents, I understand the importance of independent transportation for convenience and self-reliance. However, certain health conditions associated with aging may pose risks. Rather than broad bans, I believe driving ability should be assessed case-by-case, perhaps with annual check-ins. This upholds seniors' freedom while addressing concerns. Driving represents vital independence for many older adults. At the same time, declining visual, cognitive or physical health could endanger others if not evaluated properly. Individualized assessments seem the fairest compromise between maintaining autonomy and ensuring road safety. With a thoughtful system of evaluation, we can preserve mobility and dignity for seniors while protecting the broader public.

student-753

Interview

As a physician, my main concerns are the patient's health and respecting their wishes. However, at 16 they are a minor, so I would also need to consider the parents' wishes if they are the legal guardians. I would want to have private conversations with the patient and parents separately to better understand the patient's desire for the procedure and gauge their knowledge so I can provide information and answer questions. Similarly, I would seek to comprehend the parents' opposition in a non-judgmental way by allowing them to voice concerns and addressing any questions so they may feel more comfortable. After these discussions, I would encourage the parents and child to speak together to understand both perspectives. My role is to serve as an impartial third party source of procedural information, not advocating for either side since my duty is to both the patient and the legal guardians. By facilitating open dialogue for all parties to voice their reasoning, I aim to find the best resolution that balances the patient's well-being, autonomy, and the parents' right to decide what is medically appropriate for their minor child.

student-749

Interview

Having volunteered in a long-term care home, I understand the difficulty this situation poses, having witnessed patients pass away. While fulfilling your duties, you must remain mindful and empathetic on this sensitive topic. I would approach the family privately in a comfortable setting to offer emotional support and resources. I would also take time to reflect on my own feelings, as this is distressing for staff too. Practicing self-care and speaking with other healthcare practitioners to address my needs is important. My goal is providing compassionate care for the grieving family while recognizing the emotional toll on myself and taking steps to manage that burden as well. This requires an empathetic approach for the family combined with conscious efforts to tend to my own wellbeing during an extremely difficult time.

student-741

Interview

As a doctor, your first role is to prioritize the patient and act in the patient's best interests. So of course, if the patients feel as if they want a different doctor, then I would oblige and try to help them find a different doctor that is a better fit for them. However, as a physician, you have a responsibility to be professional and try to better yourself and try to be the best you can be. So I would first reach out to the family and ask them what exactly I might have done wrong and what exactly I could do to be better in situations like this, because I want to learn from my mistakes and be better for the next patient. Maybe this bedside manner difficulty was because I was from a different culture than the patient. So in order for me to be a good health advocate and have cultural competence enough to give equal high quality care to patients from all different backgrounds, I have to try and figure out what the root of the problem is so I can address that problem myself. Lastly, as a doctor, you have to be a good communicator and build a good relationship with your patient and be able to empathize with them, explain things to them in a way they can understand and make sure that they have all the information that they need. So if I was not clear enough or not sympathetic enough to the patient situation, that I need to know so I can adjust my approach moving forward with different patients. I would also ask the family if they would like to give me an opportunity to fix my bedside manner and make it suit their needs better. And if they say no, I would of course tell them that's totally fine, and try to give them options of colleagues who might have the kind of bedside manner that they are most comfortable with and what they're looking for.

student-806

Interview

Before I begin, I just want to thank you for taking the time to listen to why I want to be a doctor. I'm a mature applicant now, and my decision to become a doctor was really something that I wanted to take my time with to make sure it was the right thing for me and explore all my options as a student. I liked the idea of medicine, exploring topics in health and science, but it wasn't until my professional work, education, and volunteer work that I've done as a working professional that really brought me back to medicine and made me realize that it was what I wanted to do with my life. To touch on those experiences as a working professional - right now, I'm a clinical trial monitor with the Canadian Cancer Trials Group at Queen's University. In this role, I have the opportunity to collaborate with research teams across the country on the clinical research that we're doing that is really improving care options available for patients. It's tremendously gratifying to be able to follow a patient's treatment story indirectly as a clinical trial monitor and get to know the best practices that are taking place at each of our clinical research sites. One of the trials that I'm tremendously proud to have worked on was one that improved survival and progression status in breast cancer patients. This was a huge landmark trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine, and has since been adopted as a treatment option for high risk breast cancer patients. I'm tremendously proud to have worked on it and I want to be able to translate experiences like that into a clinical care setting. I want to be able to find ways to improve patient care. One of the things that came to my mind is something that I learned in my part-time course on social determinants of health. I'm also a part-time student - I've taken courses in anatomy and social determinants of health. In the context of my work and existing education, I've really been able to integrate all of these things together into a more comprehensive image of what I think health and wellbeing actually are and ways to address them as a physician. I'm really excited at the prospect of a holistic care model - not only looking at clinical care and interventions, pharmacological and non-pharmacological, but also interventions that address the social determinants of health, like the underlying causes for why people experience the things they do. I think the most important thing, the experience that made me say "this is what I want to do", was working at the COVID-19 vaccination clinics. I think we'll all recall the uncertainty and anxiety people had about COVID-19 and how it was shaping the world. I wanted to get involved managing it as soon as I could, whether with tracking or vaccines. Specifically working in those vaccine clinics as part of that clinical care team was a really gratifying experience. One that I'm tremendously proud to have been involved in something that I'll be able to speak to for the rest of my life. Being told that I'm giving people their lives back by working at these clinics is something that I want to be able to experience every day as a doctor. As soon as I had that opportunity, that was it for me. I knew this is what I want to do. I think the person-to-person interaction is something that I've always loved. The integration of sociological and health factors that I've learned about from my work and school experiences have really brought me to this point where I'm ready to become a doctor, where I know that I want to be a doctor.

student-807

Interview

If the club covers the full costs for only three people, the other members may perceive preferential treatment, which could negatively impact working relationships within the club. We could split the money so everyone's expenses are partially covered, but some members may still be unable to afford the trip. To try to cover more costs for everyone, I would propose a fundraiser. Whatever money we raise could help offset more of the trip expenses per person. This approach demonstrates fairness by providing support based on participation rather than favoritism. It also fosters teamwork as members work together toward the common goal of making the trip accessible to all.

student-727

Interview

Well, the main issue here is that if the baby keeps screaming and crying, it could disturb the other passengers who may have important events the next day and need a good night's sleep. Also, the parents are likely feeling embarrassed about their baby's behavior. So we need to take both sides into account. What I would do is approach the parents in a polite, private manner so as not to embarrass them publicly. I would ask if anything is wrong with the baby - maybe the baby is hungry, needs a snack, doesn't have any toys, etc. Gathering more information first allows me to make a more informed decision about how to help. I could then offer some alternatives, like playing with the baby myself to provide a calming distraction if the baby is just feeling stressed from the plane environment. If the baby does settle down, problem solved. But if not, as a last resort I would put in earphones and listen to loud music so I don't hear the crying and can get some rest. The goal is to find a mutually considerate solution that respects the needs of both the parents and other passengers.

student-719

Interview

This can be a challenging situation. Doctors want to promote life and want their patients to live long and spend time with family. However, we have to consider the patient's feelings and quality of life with a critical condition, which can be extremely difficult. I believe physician-assisted suicide could be ethically appropriate if the patient is making a fully informed decision and is aware of alternatives like palliative care and the impact on loved ones. If after thorough discussion and reflection the patient still feels strongly that assisted suicide is the right choice, and the physician is comfortable proceeding, they should be able to move ahead. The key is ensuring it is truly the patient's autonomous, informed choice, with full comprehension of all options. If those conditions are met, then physician-assisted suicide could be conducted ethically.

student-754

Interview

This past summer, I had the opportunity to work in landscape construction as a laborer, my first job of this kind. I felt nervous starting out. When I couldn't find retail or similar roles, I took a chance on this position given my active interests. On my first day, it was an emotional toll and I doubted myself, having never done manual labor before. It gave me empathy for those doing this daily. Waking at 6am and working to 6pm was grueling. But I persevered by learning from others, utilizing resources, and pushing through. I stuck with it for a few months. While challenging being new to this work, it was a growth experience. Stepping outside my comfort zone built resilience and appreciation for the hard work done by trade professionals who perform these demanding jobs every day. In the end, I'm grateful to have developed new skills and insights.

student-747

Interview

This is a difficult situation, so we need to consider both perspectives - that of the doctor and the government health insurance program. I believe it is unethical for doctors to recommend circumcisions without clearly informing patients of the risks and downsides, since this is not a medically necessary procedure. Doctors should provide patients with full information about the risks and cons so they can make a fully informed, autonomous decision. On the other hand, the government insurance program (OHIP) is no longer covering circumcisions, which fails to take into account people who need the surgery for religious reasons. The government should be more aware of religious beliefs requiring circumcision. A better approach could be to target coverage for those who need it for religious reasons, while also informing the general public that routine circumcision is unnecessary and carries some risks. This way we maintain patient autonomy but provide access when warranted by religious belief. The key is fully informing all patients and balancing access with education on risks and benefits. This allows patients to make autonomous choices while targeting coverage to those with religious need.

student-720

Interview

Thanks for the question. In this case, it's a very difficult scenario because while I care about this boy's well being and also want to ensure transparency and honesty when communicating with him, I also have to balance the importance of respecting his parents decision as well. The first thing I would do in this specific scenario is try to understand why the parents don't want to tell the twelve year old boy about the diagnosis. There are many possible reasons and I don't want to assume. It could be that it could damage him or hurt him psychologically. It could be that perhaps his mental wellbeing could adversely affect his physical health, or perhaps there might be a risk of self harm if that boy finds out he was diagnosed with a terminal illness. There are a multitude of reasons, and I would set up a private meeting with both of the parents to have an open and honest conversation regarding their concerns. After hearing their concerns, then I would probably help them share some alternatives. So I would also share my point of view. Specifically in this specific scenario, I can understand that the boy, if he doesn't know, he would not be able to make an autonomous choice since there is no minimum decision making capacity. If that boy has demonstrated comprehension as well as insight and demonstrated decision making capacity as a physician, it's also important to ensure that the boy can have an autonomous choice and make decisions that reflect his own personal values and beliefs. For example, his beliefs of continuing with the type of treatment and the types of side effects he's willing to endure might be completely different than that of his parents. So it's really important to have an open dialogue and understand the boys preferences in order to have him make an informed and autonomous decision making process. However, with the parents, they also have a concern and after gathering more information, I would try to and after sharing that with the parents on the boy's autonomy and ability to make an informed decision, I would try to again see the scenario. If the parents are concerned that the boy might self harm after finding out this news, then I would not tell the boy because that could be very dangerous to him and perhaps he needs some time to digest this information. However, if it is for perhaps alternative reasons such as the parents may not know how to disclose this news to the boy or they're not ready to do so yet, I would try to respect that. And if they want to disclose at a certain point, then I would help them in any way I can. Perhaps setting up a meeting with all of us. And perhaps I can disclose it, or his parents can disclose it, but being very sensitive about it while also to the boy explaining it in a way so that he can understand what a malignancy is and what are some of the consequences and repercussions. I think if this is a scenario, I would definitely encourage the parents to disclose the news to the boy so that we can also understand his values and preferences and help create care that is comprehensive and also takes into account his perspective while also helping him with therapy or other types of counseling so that he can digest and take in this information. So ultimately, in summary, my main concern here is again for the boys' wellbeing. I would first want to gather a lot more information from the parents on their primary concern as to why they don't want to disclose this means. I would then after listening to them share some of my concerns such as perhaps the boy. We're not integrating the boys will and autonomous allowing him to make an autonomous choice. And lastly, I would try to if there is no risk that this boy is involved in may self harm, then I would try to encourage the parents to share that with the boy and facilitate that conversation. So we are navigating that in a sensitive way. This is a very difficult topic in general because again there are no easy alternatives. However, it's really important to be patient and to acknowledge that since this boy is a minor, the parents may know something that I don't and so we need to respect that and respect the parents' decision.

student-833

Interview

This scenario, where Dr. Cheung is recommending homeopathic medicines to his patients despite the lack of scientific evidence and him not fully believing it either, calls up a number of fascinating ethical dilemmas. Initially, I thought that the doctor’s behavior was considered ethically wrong since he himself didn’t believe in homeopathic medicine due to the scant evidence, yet was recommending it to patients. However, if he communicated clearly about the lack of scientific evidence and how he does not believe in it to the patients, and the patients are aware of it, then it is not ethically wrong. Ultimately, the patients have the rights to be aware of the treatment plans, including the benefits and risks involved, before making informed decisions. So, if the patients are still willing to consent to the homeopathic approach, despite him explaining the risks involved, then going in accordance with respecting patients’ autonomy, this would not be an ethical issue. On the contrary, it becomes an ethical issue when the doctor withholds detailed explanations and information about the approach from his patients. Doing so, he violates patients’ autonomy and isn’t acting in their best interests. Using the psychological effect of placebo to create a false sense of reassurance is considered deceiving and misleading. This jeopardizes patients' trust for this doctor or even the entire medical system since patients may find out that the prescribed drug has no effect in improving their conditions. Hence, by failing to inform clearly about the treatment, he is preventing his patients from making an informed decision about their healthcare. However, this situation leaves out some details that are important before arriving at a final conclusion: [1] Is he doing business with or promoting homeopathic medicines because his name is on the meds? [2] Does he have a financial stake in these drugs? [3] Is he qualified to practice complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to offer this treatment to patients? [4] Did he explore other alternatives within conventional medicine before recommending this approach? If he is doing business or has a commercial interest, it might be unethical for him to be recommending such treatment given that his clinical judgement could be clouded based on his business interest, suggesting a conflict of interest. Moreover, there is a likelihood that patients are easily persuaded as to the “reassurance” of the treatment through trust of an SMC-registered doctor. Hence, it is crucial to keep in mind the patient's autonomy and right to all information of potentially available treatments. In conclusion, it would be unethical for him to be recommending an approach that lacks scientific evidence. It is also equally unethical for him to create a false sense of reassurance for his patients just because he believes that homeopathic medicines do no harm. I would recommend that he stays transparent and be honest with his patients by openly discussing the lack of evidence and explaining the potential implications. Doing so, he maintains the trust and respect of his patients which will not result in misleading “reassurance”.

student-801

Interview

Recognizing such a complex scenario, my priority would be to uphold the integrity and principles of being a practicing medical practitioner while also emphasizing the importance of well-being for myself, my elderly patients and society as a whole. In this situation, I would give myself the vaccine because ensuring my health and safety during the outbreak would allow me to continue working to provide healthcare services to other elderly patients. Not only would I be benefiting myself, but I would be benefiting these patients of mine as well. Assisting these patients is a large responsibility of mine, and I am obliged to fulfill that responsibility. Giving the vaccine to a different person might not be the best option. I would give it to myself.

student-758

Interview

The issue here is that if she continues this behavior, she will likely get an undeserved high grade, which is unfair to other students. However, I understand the pressures she faces to get a high GPA for medical school admission. I would approach her privately in a non-confrontational manner to gather more information on her motivations. If it was solely to get a high GPA, I would explain that this dishonest approach is unacceptable, but offer to help her find other interesting courses instead. If she agrees, I would gladly assist in finding an alternative. If she declines, I would urge her to confess to the professor so he can make appropriate adjustments. And if she refuses, I would inform the professor myself. I would apologize to her, but explain I must act with integrity. This allows us to maintain academic honesty while making an ethical decision before she improperly benefits.

student-723

Interview

As frustrating as it might be to hear a parent does not want to vaccinate their newborn, I believe the parent is still responsible for making that decision for their child. The newborn cannot be considered a mature minor to make decisions, so it is up to the parent. However, I would still do everything in my power to try to convince the parents to vaccinate. I would ask to meet with them and say I understand their concern - there is a lot of misinformation out there and it can be hard to discern reality from folly. I would tell them the facts honestly - vaccinating their newborn will significantly reduce the chance of developing the disease. If after hearing the facts they still believe their newborn should not be vaccinated, then I have to listen to the parents' choice, because they are making the decision for the child. I would need to let the parents decide what is best for their child.

student-816

Interview

Yeah. So of course, since the medical admissions process is so long and tough, I have thought about other career plans. For example, I wanted also to be an engineer because actually a lot of people tell me that those are very different career paths but I actually don't think so. I think that they have a lot of similarities. For example, both in medicine and in engineering, you have to be able to communicate your thoughts clearly and patiently. The engineer has to communicate with his colleagues and with the client and make sure that he can explain everything in simple terms so that everybody understands and is comfortable with what the prognosis will be. The doctor too, has to talk in a simple manner with the patient and he has to make sure that he's very well understood because the patient's treatment is at risk. Also, I think in both careers you need to have an analytic brain, which is something I have because I can analyze things very quickly. For example, when I was in a biology class, the teacher said something and it automatically clicked in my brain that it contradicted something she had said earlier. So I wanted to ask her the question and she told me that it was a mistake. As I said, I'm very able to find when something is not making sense because I have an analytical brain and critical thinking. I think both engineers and doctors have to diagnose and establish a prognosis. Well, they both require critical thinking because sometimes you have to be able to not be so gullible and to actually think for yourself instead of listening to others. Also, I think the main difference between the two is that engineers will require less empathy than doctors, which is why I want to go into medicine and not anymore into engineering because I'm someone who's very empathetic and who can really feel what somebody's feeling and put myself in their shoes. For example, when my friend was really sad one day, I was there for her and I could actually feel her pain and I started crying with her. And also through helping my father, who's sick with multiple sclerosis, I actually could develop and just put forward my empathy, because I always had to know when something was uncomfortable for him, and I helped him through it. And I could also talk with him and figure out what went wrong, why he's sad. And I could always encourage him, and he always felt better afterwards. So this is why I want to go into medicine and not into engineering because I have empathy and I want to use it because I love reassuring people and simply putting a smile on people's faces after they've been sad.

student-796

Interview

In comparing laughter to medicine, the main point is to emphasize the vital role emotions play in people's health. No matter your medical expertise or technological proficiency, a crucial aspect is empathy. Being able to express kindness, care, and positive emotions through smiling, welcoming body language, and laughter is key - especially with distressed populations like children in healthcare settings. The statement underscores the significance of emotions, which I hope to apply in my medical career. Medical knowledge is important, but emotional intelligence and the ability to connect matter immensely too. This reminder to incorporate compassion and positivity will guide me as I work to improve patients' wellbeing.

student-729

Interview

If I notice bruises on a 10-year-old patient, I must first understand the cause before jumping to conclusions, just as I would want if I were the parent. I would analyze the bruises, and if I suspect abuse, have a private conversation with the boy to protect his autonomy and privacy. If he shares more about the situation, my priority is supporting him - empathizing, comforting him in my office. I would discuss available resources, though reporting to parents could endanger him further. Since he is only 10, I would ensure he has a support system like another family member he can talk to regularly and somewhere safe to go. His well-being is most important. I cannot leave it at that, as returning home may lead to further harm. So I would try to have a conversation with the parents, not to blame or confront them, but to understand their personalities and what is behind their actions. If issues like addiction, temper, or lack of resources are factors, I can offer help - improving the child's life also means improving the whole family's. I would share my concerns without implicating the child, framing it as my own observations so the boy is not punished. Providing my contact information, I would follow up to monitor the situation closely. My goal is to address this sensitively while prioritizing the child's safety and well-being.

student-795

Interview

As part of this advocacy group, I believe everyone's opinions should be valued, so we must emphasize not routinely dismissing others' ideas. I would have a private, non-accusatory conversation with this student to understand their perspective on why they feel their ideas require more attention. While acknowledging their ideas may be great, I would explain the importance of collaborating towards our shared goal, as teamwork enables greater success. If they still choose to leave after this discussion where I had no ill intent and simply sought the group's betterment, I would reach out and reiterate that I only want what is best for the group. If there is still no understanding, unfortunately we may have to move forward without them. But hopefully the group is stronger overall by upholding respect for all members' contributions.

student-733

Interview

My perspective on our role in activism is that physicians usually act on a more individual level as they're treating symptoms that patients may have. But I also believe that there are many health issues which are systemic, and that physicians should do their part in addressing these issues, maybe even appealing to government bodies when they don't agree with a piece of legislation. But at the same time, their primary responsibility is activism on a patient level. I believe that to be a competent physician, the doctor always needs to have the patient in mind and advocate for the patient's self interests.

student-818

Interview

This is a sensitive situation that requires compassion and transparency. As the surgeon who discharged a now deceased patient, the family deserves answers. First, I would thoroughly review the patient's file, my discharge notes, and consult other providers involved to understand the full context that led to discharging her. This will help me better explain my rationale to the grieving family. I would invite the family to meet in person if possible, or by phone/video if needed. Without making assumptions, I would let them express their feelings and ask questions without judgement. I understand their pain and confusion at losing someone they expected to recover. I would walk through the treatment plan, health status at discharge, and reasoning in simple, clear terms. If I cannot fully answer a question, I would connect them with a provider who can. Most importantly, I would acknowledge the enormous difficulty for the family, validating their emotions. I would offer as much support as I can, meeting again if desired, and connecting them with counseling/community resources during this devastating time. My priority is being transparent about decisions made, while also providing compassion and support to help the family through grief over losing their loved one. Open communication and empathy are essential.

student-789

Interview

I have not considered any other careers besides being a physician because my whole life I've wanted to care for patients, and help them advocate for themselves and their own care as well. I want to devote the rest of my life to helping patients advocate for their own care. Although I have a deep respect for other health professionals and I would love to work with them in contributing to the patient care experience, I believe that being a physician will fulfill this desire. As a physician, I can ensure that patients receive the best care possible. I want to ensure that patients receive the best care possible. As a physician, I can ensure that they receive this care.

student-817

Interview

First, I would greet Jason, thank him for having me over, and have an open conversation. I want to listen without judgment to understand why he hasn't been attending class and how I can help him return. There could be many underlying reasons I'm unaware of. If he's going through a difficult time, I'll offer support to help get him back on track for classes and medical school applications. If it's a lack of motivation or feeling discouraged by the difficulty, I can relate - medical school is challenging. In that case, we'd discuss his goals and ways I can assist, like studying together or working on applications. The aim is hearing his perspective, offering support tailored to his needs, and outlining how we can move forward productively. By having an empathetic discussion oriented around helping him achieve his dreams, I hope to get him back on the path towards success.

student-737

Interview

Three key qualities that exemplify my personable nature are communication skills, patient advocacy, and ability to collaborate. Peers in school, work, and my personal life would describe me as personable - someone who connects well with others. This involves qualities like effectively communicating, standing up for patients, and finding common ground. I demonstrated these traits early on in my clinical experience volunteering at a family medical clinic. One day an elderly male patient was giving the receptionists a hard time and the other introverted volunteers looked to me to intervene. Despite having no experience, I approached the man and acknowledged his frustration. I engaged him in conversation, asked about his grandchildren, and found commonalities to establish a connection. Though initially angry, he soon relaxed and we had a meaningful interaction. This exemplified using communication, advocacy, and collaboration to resolve a tense situation. The ability to build rapport is so valuable for a healthcare provider. As a prospective physician assistant, I want to bring my personable nature to relate to patients, make them feel heard, and build trust. My interpersonal skills allow me to connect with diverse people, understand their needs, and forge lasting relationships. These qualities represent my strengths.

student-788

Interview

In this complex scenario, I would assist these patients by educating and keeping them informed to promote autonomy and engagement in their treatment. The patient-doctor relationship is a two-way street requiring trust and transparency from both sides. When weighing if medication side effects are worthwhile, looking at the harm versus benefit is crucial. If risks outweigh advantages, exploring alternatives may be best. Cost and financial factors are also important considerations. Taking a holistic view and maintaining openness with patients can help find the ideal solution. My role is to provide the full picture regarding treatments so patients can voice preferences and collaborate in decision-making. By prioritizing their well-being and partnership, I aim to support patients in navigating difficult choices to optimize their health outcomes.

student-751

Interview

One time I disappointed my parents was during my brief stint on a higher-level soccer team. I had played soccer my whole life in Northern Ontario, where competition was limited. One year, I was good enough to make a team with kids a year older than me, around ages 12-13. This team traveled most weekends to play tournaments in Southern Ontario, about a 5 hour drive each way. Being a year younger at that developmental age meant I was less physically mature and lacked confidence compared to my older teammates. As a result, I hardly got any playing time during the tournaments. At first my parents reassured me, proud I even made the team. But I could see it wear on them that they were spending entire weekends traveling just to watch me sit on the bench. To ease their disappointment, I reevaluated my relationship with the sport. I loved soccer and the chance to compete, but wanted to enjoy playing more, and have my parents enjoy watching me play. So the next year, I dropped back down to my age group. I became captain, played entire games, and had much more fun. While it was good to get that higher-level experience, considering how I felt and accounting for my parents' experience led me to make a change. Consolidating onto an age-appropriate team ended up being better for me and my family. I was able to have a more fulfilling soccer career moving forward.

student-764

Interview

This is an incredibly difficult situation and likely the worst thing a physician could experience - seeing your patient die after discharge. The family's question about why you discharged the patient is completely valid. First, I would avoid becoming defensive. I would review the case notes, surgery recording if available, and consult other physicians involved in the patient's care to see if any mistakes or oversights occurred. I would do this quickly to get answers for the family. I would arrange a meeting with the family soon after to express my deepest condolences and give them space to share their concerns and frustrations. I would explain my rationale for discharging the patient based on her status at the time. If my review found no issues with her care, I would communicate we discharged her without expecting this outcome. I would do everything possible to understand what happened and be open to an autopsy with their consent. Most importantly, I would not absolve myself of potential blame. I would offer transparent theories about what could have occurred and potential solutions or ways to rectify the situation, even if unlikely to fully assuage their concerns. I would aim to be as open and honest as possible about what went wrong if anything did, or explain our reasoning if not. I would discuss what could have been done differently in hindsight and validate their concerns. There are many potential approaches, but the priorities are avoiding defensiveness, answering all questions, looking for more answers, and being transparent. This is devastating for the family, and no explanation will be fully satisfying. But I would work to help them get the answers they need while expressing empathy for their loss. Admitting fault if applicable and working to prevent recurrence is critical after an outcome like this.

student-770

Interview

Yeah. This idea of a bonus fee per doctor visit for me, on the surface of things, it does not sound like a really good idea. The reason why is because it will create scenarios where nonadherence may arise. And nonadherence as a prospective physician assistant, I understand how risky and how dangerous that is. By nonadherence, I mean the fact that a lot of patients or potential patients may see that cost and not think that their particular condition is worth going to see the doctor for. For example, an older patient who may experience headaches. A headache could be an underlying factor, an underlying symptom for a much more severe condition like a stroke or some forms of diabetes or other heart disease. So that could create some confusion and that could all stem from that additional cost that comes from those visits. And another way I could see nonadherence coming up in this scenario is through patients just not following through with additional follow-ups, for example, or prescriptions. In my experience, when I was volunteering at a family walk-in clinic in the Peel region of Ontario, I've spoken and had conversations with some patients who did not feel like going through with their prescription was worth it. One person who I was having a chat with a few months ago during the middle part of my journey as a clinical volunteer told me how he had some form of eczema. And there was this cream, this topical cream that was prescribed to him by the physician at the clinic. But he was telling me how because of how expensive and pricey it was, that he didn't feel it was necessary or worth it to follow through with it. But now we can see that and how it's reflected in this scenario where some patients may see that cost and think that it's way too hefty and not follow up with what a physician may suggest or a prescription or another visit or a visit to another specialized clinic. And these are all factors that do come into play when creating this new policy. But one positive impact that I could see come out from this new change could be the decreased wait times as some patients may see that their condition isn't as serious or necessary to visit a doctor. And that could overall in the long run decrease how many patients there are in a clinic at a specific time. But once again, that does intertwine with the negative impacts because if a patient feels like symptoms aren't as serious, where do we draw that line? Where it becomes serious or where it may be part of an underlying disease that may be more serious? So that is yeah.

student-797

No results found.

There are no results with this criteria. Try changing your search.

You earned points ✨

You need more points to do that

Library of Responses

Videoath Verified.

Trusted by 3871 others.

Curate a realistic interview.

Didn't know what to say?

Category Breakdown

Responses feedback score

Peer Progression

How it works

Sign Up to Track Your Journey

Earn Points

Unlock Resources

Take on Tests and Get Stat Insights

Member

's recent activity

Resources

How it works