Practice for your interview with a big list of sample questions - all for free. Start practicing now.
Videoath Verified.
We routinely check on our resources to ensure they're up to date and continue to be a good reference.
Trusted by 6751 others.
You're in good company. We update this counter to let you know who else completed the prompt.
Review Peer Responses
Preview de-identified and anonymized peers interview responses, providing a rich source of inspiration and insights to refine your own answers.
General Breakdown
Offers an in-depth analysis of interview prompts, providing critical insights such as difficulty level, competencies assessed, and strategic tips. Coming soon!
Expert Response
Watch and learn from experts. Coming soon.
Response Walkthrough
Step-by-step review of good, better, and excellent responses so you know exactly what parts of your responses get you a higher score. Coming soon.
Aggregate Response Score
Compare your response to 100s of peer responses. Coming soon.
Score Breakdown
See how prompts are broken down and reviewed across 1000s of applicants. Coming soon.
You witness two girls hitting a homeless woman and taking items that belong to her. The victim has only a bleeding nose. You approach her after the incident and she tells you she is fine, this has happened before by the same girls and it is no big deal. How do you deal with it?
A physician picked up a car accident victim from the street and brought him to the ER in his car. He did not want to wait for an ambulance because the patient‟s condition was critical. Physical examination in the ER reveals quadriplegia. Is the physician liable for this consequence?
A message that recently appeared on the Web warned readers of the dangers of aspartame as a cause of an epidemic of multiple sclerosis. The authors claimed that aspartame remains on the market because the food and drug industries have powerful lobbies in Congress. They quoted Dr. Russell Blaylock, who said. "The ingredients stimulate the neurons of the brain to death, causing brain damage of varying degrees." Critique this message, in terms of the strength of the arguments presented and their logical consistency. Your critique might include an indication of the issues that you would like to delve into further before assessing the validity of these claims.
Imagine your friend‟s father is 70 years old and has lived in Edmonton his whole life. He is taken to the emergency department at the University of Alberta Hospital. He has had good health until now and this is the first time he has been to hospital of any kind since he was 20 years old. What changes in the healthcare system and environment in the hospital do you think he would notice?