Practice for your interview with a big list of sample questions - all for free. Start practicing now.

Videoath Verified.
We routinely check on our resources to ensure they're up to date and continue to be a good reference.
Trusted by 6751 others.
You're in good company. We update this counter to let you know who else completed the prompt.

Review Peer Responses
Preview de-identified and anonymized peers interview responses, providing a rich source of inspiration and insights to refine your own answers.

General Breakdown
Offers an in-depth analysis of interview prompts, providing critical insights such as difficulty level, competencies assessed, and strategic tips. Coming soon!

Expert Response
Watch and learn from experts. Coming soon.

Response Walkthrough
Step-by-step review of good, better, and excellent responses so you know exactly what parts of your responses get you a higher score. Coming soon.

Aggregate Response Score
Compare your response to 100s of peer responses. Coming soon.

Score Breakdown
See how prompts are broken down and reviewed across 1000s of applicants. Coming soon.
People infected with COVID-19 variants are experiencing a spectrum of symptoms with some suggesting that it can be compared to the flu or common cold. Some believe that the risk of vaccination side effects (e.g. inflammation of the heart) may outweigh the risk of contracting COVID. Discuss your stance on vaccination decision making when factoring side effects and contracting the disease.
You are a medical student. Another medical student, Sam, invites you to a study group with three other students. At the study group, you find that the students are using real cases from their clinical rotations. When you ask Sam about this, they explain that the group removes always patient identifiers and that they feel that current cases are a great way to learn medicine.What considerations should be made in this situation? Would you say anything further to Sam? Are there any other actions you would take?
Learn from Great Responses
